Humans are hopelessly deluded and gullible.
As the archons know, the slightest assertions or implying of Literalist OSC Possibilism captures these children and effortlessly misleads them.
I can only write for an audience of one: myself, including those who understand 100% Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism.
I aim to put-off anyone who doesn't understand that this is THE theory by which every conversation must refer to and be compared to.
Most writers have the wrong attitude: they try to please their audience.
To hell with the reader! The readers' values are hopelessly f'd up.
Appeasing readers' values and expectations can only mean perpetuating false reality.
Push the audience off the cliff — they are the problem, the enemy; any consideration of them is a contamination with compromise with THE SYSTEM of false reality and its supporting infrastructure of prejudiced preconceptions, standing on a hopeless heap of false assumptions the moment they step out of bed.
"The pseudo-Pauline writings" — AS IF any writings are by a real Paul! (Edwin Johnson's point.)
"Entheogens might be authentic like traditional mysticism" — AS IF traditional mysticism was something other than entheogens! (Michael Hoffman's point.)
Language = hypnosis into a system of false presumptions.
"Don't lose control" — but in what sense does this imply we ever could possess control? WE HAVE ASSUMED CONTROL.
My goal is not to please the reader's expectations and values.
I have no idea of the reader's values or what distortions and silent false, misleading presumptions will please them. To give a sh*t about the reader is to mislead the reader.
I'm unconcerned with readers. I write a theory that machines can learn.
My goal is tight theory, not pleasing readers' expectations.
I am an engineer, not an entertainer. I make useful finished models, packaged conclusions that work to explain sh*t.
I would say "to hell with the reader", but that errs in thinking too much about the reader.
I have weeded out any consideration for the audience.
Pleasing the reader's preconceptions has nothing to do with proper science, except ergonomics of usability.
The focus is not readership, but integrity of theory first, and practical usability second.
I am intensely suspicious of print
I find I truly am a child of the Internet era
I only trust what's on the Internet
The old mentality, of old people who are perpetuating the old outdated, never-appropriate paradigm — the flat-earth Ptolemaic paradigm with its mere tiny use of entheogens as minor moderate corrective epicycles — is to trust print and distrust the Internet.
I am the opposite.
I am intensely attuned and hypersensitive to the shortcomings of print, the censorship that is print.
print equals censorship and falsehood
Internet equals honesty and truth
Howard Rheingold says that when you post at the WELL, online in cyberspace, you are full-on publishing.
I cannot risk my thinking being censored. I do not want anything to do with the medium of censorship witches print.
I read print as the medium of falsehood, intellectual compromise and self-censorship. I read print to find out what the current fallacious thinking is.
Print is a load of censorship, a load of distortion, preconceptions, of the old paradigm.
Anyone who writes anything in print has preconceptions and prejudice, distortion, censorship.
I am not accusing Park St Press w censorship, i spoke w them at witches publishing expo they are sympathetic
They are my first consideration but i only trust self publishing
I suppose i am like punk diy indie record industry, authenticity cannot possibly be present in corporate major labels
I see the most radical libertarians in print as hopelessly compromised with Establishment preconceptions
Ruck? Mainstream Establishment sellout compromised. There's no way Ruck could ever write truth, operating within the false consciousness reality tunnel of THE SYSTEM.
I am permitted to write truth because I am no one on the Internet. Academics are prevented and prohibited from writing truth.
Academics, whose albums are distributed through the major labels, *you* can't do this, *you* are prohibited from writing and asserting more than one of the following:
the 100% Ahistoricity Theory of Ancient Religious Founder Figures: Jesus Paul Buddha church fathers Mohammed et Cetera: all fictional metaphorical entities.
the 100% Entheogen Theory of Religion and Culture
the 100% Metaphor Theory of Religious Mythology
100% Metaphorical 100% Entheogenic 100% Eternalism
God is the author of evil and of all control-thoughts.
There is only one world, not multiple possibility branching, not many worlds; and one preset, pre-existing future, which like king Oedipus, we cannot steer away from.
Free will is an illusion; that is exactly what authentic religion reveals — Sam Harris is blind in opposing no-free-will to religion; religious mythology precisely asserts — far more than Harris' little mental model can fathom — no-free-will.
Heaven and hell are metaphorical only.
The gospel is not how to go to heaven instead of hell after you bodily die, and the New Testament does not focus on asserting that anyway.
If you think that's what the New Testament asserts and is concerned with, you are hypnotized by The System's official Catholic profitable con artists.
The Protestant Reformation was hopelessly brainwashed and barely broke away from the Catholic, invented substutute for religion.
What passes for Protestant religion is really hopelessly tainted Catholic corporate lies, Catholic false substitute version, counterfeit phony replacement Christianity, with only slight inconsequential modifications.
The Church of Christ non-denomination, primitive restorationist New Testament Christianity, is no more than a tiny step away from THE SYSTEM's fraudulent Catholocism towards the right direction.
In critical discourse analysis, academics are only at the very very beginning of starting to think critically, and slowly becoming dimly aware of their total prejudice and preconceptions.
Drug-free religion is fake religion and is only traditional insofar as fake, outsiders religion is traditional – a tradition of delusion, lies, and shallow mimicry of source/core authentic religion.
We can know truth and the universal core perennial of religion which can only be known by proper modern systematic science and rationality, which is based in the loose cognitive state produced by psychedelic drugs, which are the traditional and only source of religious revelation.
Psychology based around Freud's idea of child memories is bogus and more misleading than helpful.
Grof is phony pretense in holotropic breathwork.
Grof is literalist and wrong about birth trauma. He leads away from comprehending the loose cognitive state's pregnancy, dragon-threat, and birth that transforms thinking from Possibilism to Eternalism.
The Egodeath theory is the right basis and starting point.
Grof is hopelessly hypnotized within, and unable to break away from, Literalist OSC Possibilism.
Previous generation of writers about cognitive looseners must be disbelieved, to overthrow their self-defeating limitations. These would-be leaders have mis-led.
We were not enlightened by them about the self-control seizure-wound through which new fertile life sprouts up from the rock cave underworld.
By failing control, we are made to cause our death as control agents in the loose cognitive binding mode and undergo the mind's universal innate experiential reconfiguration specifically from Possibilism to the Eternalism mental model of time, self, and control, which is rational and enables a plainly, simply scientific model and understanding of truth per the rational scientific modern Enlightenment era.
Since Physics succumbed to the irrational egoic freewill delusion of Copenhagenism and rejected the rational rock universe model as unacceptable to egoic freewill power, the Egodeath theory had to come from the ivy-covered computer laboratory in the Engineering department instead.
The engineers, not physicists, are the last hope for rationality and being grounded in sober, clear-thinking reality.
Drug-free meditation prevents enlightenment.
Meditation is artificial, fake, substitute pseudo-religion and is actively complicit with destructive predatorial private probation for profit incorporate press censorship.
Meditation is the official religion of The System of the archons. To say it's compromised is an understatement.
Meditation is a wing of predatory drug prohibition.
Meditation advocates are drug-demonizing bullies trying to foist off a fraudulent replacement version of religion to suppress actual religious experiencing.
The only print publication of mine is through zines:
written for Crash Collusion zine, which promptly made good on its zineish promise about cyberspace and it folded
my article crafted for Journal of Higher Criticism which therefore folded due to the superiority of the Web for such Radical Critics;
my main article — the one that lacks my explicit decoding of 2011/2013 {tree vs snake = Possibilism vs Eternalism} >:-( — written for Salvia Divinorum zine which immediately folded due to the superiority of the Web for publishing truth.
Show me a printed book and I will show you how it is compromised, waffling, and self-contradictory, filled with baseless ignorant conventional presumptions coming from Literalist OSC Possibilism, which is enforced by THE SYSTEM.
The only place where it is possible to evade THE SYSTEM OF THE ARCHONS is the WELL, the Internet newsgroups, and the World-Wide Web — Cyberspace, not the meat realm which is preposterously printed on dead trees — which per Saint Herer should be printed on psychoactive cannabis hemp anyway.
We should be able to eat printed books to experience self-control seizure; otherwise might as well choose the Kindle format.
The book Sacred Knowledge is a way of perpetuating the false reality that our own religion is not based on drugs.
Every discussion there, filled with unexamined preconceptions and silent assumptions, hypnotizes ever more deeply into the false, dead-end, self-defeating view that Christianity hasn't been based on entheogens.
To write truth, understand that the reader is the enemy.
Do not allow your thinking to be contaminated by trying to please the audience.
I write exclusively for the future, in which machines are my audience. Humans are brainwashed, gullible, incapable of critical thinking.
— Cybermonk
Egodeath Yahoo Group 