Egodeath Yahoo Group – Digest 153 (2016-06-24)


Group: egodeath Message: 7969 From: egodeath Date: 24/06/2016
Subject: Re: Scientific principles for investigating mysticism
Group: egodeath Message: 7970 From: egodeath Date: 24/06/2016
Subject: Re: Nondual unity = lesser mysteries != inside boundary
Group: egodeath Message: 7971 From: egodeath Date: 24/06/2016
Subject: Re: Intellectual autobiography & origins of Egodeath theory
Group: egodeath Message: 7973 From: egodeath Date: 24/06/2016
Subject: Control seizure atractor vortex, desire to know noncontrol enlighten
Group: egodeath Message: 7974 From: egodeath Date: 24/06/2016
Subject: Re: Nondual unity = lesser mysteries != inside boundary
Group: egodeath Message: 7975 From: egodeath Date: 24/06/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast
Group: egodeath Message: 7977 From: egodeath Date: 25/06/2016
Subject: Re: Logical Scientific Discovery
Group: egodeath Message: 7979 From: egodeath Date: 25/06/2016
Subject: Redosing mushroom wine
Group: egodeath Message: 7980 From: egodeath Date: 25/06/2016
Subject: Re: Logical Scientific Discovery
Group: egodeath Message: 7981 From: egodeath Date: 25/06/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast
Group: egodeath Message: 7982 From: egodeath Date: 25/06/2016
Subject: Against Physicalism
Group: egodeath Message: 7983 From: egodeath Date: 25/06/2016
Subject: Re: Against Physicalism
Group: egodeath Message: 7984 From: egodeath Date: 25/06/2016
Subject: Re: Against Physicalism
Group: egodeath Message: 7985 From: egodeath Date: 25/06/2016
Subject: Re: Against Physicalism
Group: egodeath Message: 7986 From: egodeath Date: 25/06/2016
Subject: Re: Against Physicalism
Group: egodeath Message: 7990 From: egodeath Date: 25/06/2016
Subject: Re: Against Physicalism
Group: egodeath Message: 7992 From: egodeath Date: 25/06/2016
Subject: Pocket computer-phone + clamshell keyboard + desktop peripherals
Group: egodeath Message: 7993 From: egodeath Date: 25/06/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast
Group: egodeath Message: 7994 From: egodeath Date: 26/06/2016
Subject: Re: Pocket computer-phone + clamshell keyboard + desktop peripherals
Group: egodeath Message: 7995 From: egodeath Date: 26/06/2016
Subject: Re: Pocket computer-phone + clamshell keyboard + desktop peripherals
Group: egodeath Message: 7996 From: egodeath Date: 26/06/2016
Subject: Re: Against Physicalism
Group: egodeath Message: 7997 From: egodeath Date: 26/06/2016
Subject: Re: Neurobollocks
Group: egodeath Message: 7998 From: egodeath Date: 26/06/2016
Subject: Re: Pocket computer-phone + clamshell keyboard + desktop peripherals
Group: egodeath Message: 8000 From: egodeath Date: 26/06/2016
Subject: Re: Neurobollocks
Group: egodeath Message: 8001 From: egodeath Date: 26/06/2016
Subject: Re: Against Physicalism
Group: egodeath Message: 8002 From: egodeath Date: 26/06/2016
Subject: Loose Cognitive Science: Cognitive Science on Psilocybin
Group: egodeath Message: 8005 From: egodeath Date: 26/06/2016
Subject: Re: The religion of Christian Cybernetic Egodeath
Group: egodeath Message: 8006 From: egodeath Date: 26/06/2016
Subject: Re: Loose Cognitive Science: Cognitive Science on Psilocybin
Group: egodeath Message: 8007 From: egodeath Date: 26/06/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast
Group: egodeath Message: 8008 From: egodeath Date: 27/06/2016
Subject: Re: Neurobollocks
Group: egodeath Message: 8009 From: egodeath Date: 27/06/2016
Subject: Bk: Aiken: Meditation and Entheogens
Group: egodeath Message: 8010 From: egodeath Date: 27/06/2016
Subject: Re: Against Physicalism
Group: egodeath Message: 8011 From: egodeath Date: 27/06/2016
Subject: Nondual unity’s shadow = control seizure gate
Group: egodeath Message: 8012 From: egodeath Date: 27/06/2016
Subject: Re: Narrowing the gate
Group: egodeath Message: 8013 From: egodeath Date: 28/06/2016
Subject: Uninspired skepticism
Group: egodeath Message: 8014 From: egodeath Date: 29/06/2016
Subject: Re: Intellectual autobiography & origins of Egodeath theory
Group: egodeath Message: 8015 From: egodeath Date: 29/06/2016
Subject: Re: Intellectual autobiography & origins of Egodeath theory
Group: egodeath Message: 8016 From: egodeath Date: 29/06/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast
Group: egodeath Message: 8018 From: egodeath Date: 29/06/2016
Subject: Re: Terence McKenna’s Time Wave Theory
Group: egodeath Message: 8019 From: egodeath Date: 29/06/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast
Group: egodeath Message: 8020 From: egodeath Date: 30/06/2016
Subject: How to fully switch to Eternalism: probe control
Group: egodeath Message: 8021 From: egodeath Date: 30/06/2016
Subject: Re: How to fully switch to Eternalism: probe control
Group: egodeath Message: 8022 From: egodeath Date: 30/06/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast
Group: egodeath Message: 8023 From: egodeath Date: 30/06/2016
Subject: Re: Book: The Psychedelic Gospels (Brown)
Group: egodeath Message: 8024 From: egodeath Date: 30/06/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast
Group: egodeath Message: 8025 From: egodeath Date: 30/06/2016
Subject: Re: How to fully switch to Eternalism: probe control
Group: egodeath Message: 8027 From: egodeath Date: 30/06/2016
Subject: Re: How to fully switch to Eternalism: probe control
Group: egodeath Message: 8028 From: egodeath Date: 30/06/2016
Subject: Re: How to fully switch to Eternalism: probe control
Group: egodeath Message: 8029 From: egodeath Date: 30/06/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast
Group: egodeath Message: 8030 From: egodeath@yahoogroups.com Date: 01/07/2016
Subject: File – EgodeathGroupCharter.txt

Group: egodeath Message: 7969 From: egodeath Date: 24/06/2016
Subject: Re: Scientific principles for investigating mysticism
Loose Cognitive Science, including the Egodeath theory, is distinct and independent from Neuroscience.

This is one sense in which I shun Neuroscience: because Neuroscience wants to subsume and eliminate this new field of Cognitive Science, Loose Cognitive Science.

The Egodeath theory, including Loose Cognitive Science, is independent of Neuroscience.

Eventually Loose Cognitive Science will dock together with Neuroscience — on my own terms. I bring new standards.

Loose Cognitive Science bows to no other science, will not bend the knee to do obeisance to Neuroscience with its strong reductionist tendency — and worse, the *dilution* effect.

Connecting Neuroscience to Loose Cognitive Science at this time would dilute Loose Cognitive Science.

At this time a full focus on Loose Cognitive Science is needed — a moratorium on Neuroscience is needed.

— Professor Loosecog

Group: egodeath Message: 7970 From: egodeath Date: 24/06/2016
Subject: Re: Nondual unity = lesser mysteries != inside boundary
My withering assessment of stunted spirituality writers who frame nondual unity consciousness as the point of religious experiencing: they are merely experiencing fastening to the physical material world as a natural innate effect of transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism.

They haven't explored control dynamics enough, during moving in and out of the Eternalism state of consciousness, a series of impressing {the Eternalism experiential perspective} on the mind, burning away the Possibilism experiential perspective, leaving only the durable bones of the underlying reality: the Eternalism worldmodel.

The best that the drug-free meditators can manage is the experience of physical fastening like in myth, trumpeted as God consciousness, nondual unity consciousness.

These mostly unregenerate, untransformed minds have yet to move beyond this initial taste of physical fastening in spacetime (which these dabblers-in-mystic-practice call "nondual unity God-consciousness").

— Professor Loosecog

Group: egodeath Message: 7971 From: egodeath Date: 24/06/2016
Subject: Re: Intellectual autobiography & origins of Egodeath theory
Changes in my motivation

1. From 1985 increasingly to ~March 1987, I was writing in blank books with increasing desperation, after suicidal frustration about dysfunctional cross-time control integrity, I became more and more trapped, wanting to stop idea devleopment in my blank books, but unable to stop idea development.

I wanted urgently to forever stop idea development, complete it, and enjoy having Transcendent Thinking, with no more self-friction.

This would be my last, desperate but victorious hour of idea development, and I can focus all on that breakthrough, because from here on out I will have posi-control, non-dysfunctional cross-time control power.

2. An important change in my attitude in ~April 1987: I became able to think for the first time, of developing an idea-development approach that's not intended to forever halt after an hour, but can be sustained and built into powerful thinking.

I became agnostic about whether I was about to halt forever, idea development, and immediately have some frictionless control for the rest of my life.

During 1987 I built up my thinking power of idea development, modelling control and time and loose cognition.

I estimated % complete periodically.

That was what I was pushing for, the direction of my effort.

I desperately, and as brightly optimistically, *had* to figure out control enlightenment immediately, and I was getting closer.

3. My attitude drastically changed in the January 1988 breakthrough about cybernetic noncontrol when experiencing Minkowski Eternalism, as far superior to the Wilber/JTP paradigm of "ego transcendence" as referring to nondual unitity consciousness through (drug-free) meditation.

My direction of pushing suddenly took a new turn: to write up my realization model.

I intended to leave engineering, for now more appropriate Philosophy, Psychology, or Religion major.

I saw that these were all being taught bunkly. Not real Philosophy. Not real Psychology. Not real Religion.

So I did the effortless: stayed in Engineering, which had permitted And enabled me to figure out Transcendent Knowledge, which people are failing to figure out in Psychology/Religion/Philosophy departments.

4. The next comparable huge change of character of what I was intending to do next, was November 2001, when reading the comic Book of Revelation, I recognized the metaphorical joking allusions to no-free-will.

I quickly confirmed and developed this, figuring out that snake = Eternalism, that eating/drinking = entheogen, and in 2011 & 2013, tree vs. snake = Possibilism vs. Eternalism.

I immediately proceeded to confirm and develop the Phase 2 theory (of religion, history, & myth), that religious mythology is description of transformation of the mental model of self-in-world from Possibilism to Eternalism, by multiple entheogen sessions.

— Professor Loosecog

Group: egodeath Message: 7973 From: egodeath Date: 24/06/2016
Subject: Control seizure atractor vortex, desire to know noncontrol enlighten
Control seizure atractor vortex, desire to know noncontrol enlightenment

The mind catches a glimpse of the paranoid bringing-together of many separate ideas, naturally changing from larval Egoic Possibilism form, to adult mature butterfly transcendent Eternalism, this idea-combination deja vu is remembered timelessly coming together.

The mind starts to glimpse an interesting and threatening and valuable and transcendent enlightening seizure vortex potential.

The more the mind sees and assembles it and starts remembering this assembling of this set of ideas, the more the mind pursues that and flees that, pursuing the jewel (can be pictured as the visionary plant or drink or food), fleeing the threatening dragon serpent vision & jewel of Transcendent Knowledge.

Steal Transcendent Knowledge from the guarding, firey serpent/sword threat that demands sacrifice of the Possibilism worldmodel to pass the gate to the Eternalism-awareness zone, mind remade Eternalism-compatible, no more ego death and threat, end of enmity with the serpent, completed.

The net-trap attractor and ego-world destroyer, a fire breathed by the flying serpent, that burns away Possibilism thinking, that kingly personal agent steering his ship forward through a tree world of possible paths.

The control seizure trap is something to hunt.

The mind is a trap that is set to catch itself. (Alan Watts)

What the mind seeks is transcendent experiential knowledge about control cancellation — like desire for coupling the high and low level, the control-power source and the control-power receiver puppet-king.

The mind innately desires and hungers for, as the Egodeath appetite, the control-undermining Limit.

The mind wants to know what dread power and danger is here, wants intimate experiencing of this amazing danger and threat and transcendent, mind-changing vulnerability — that is, a vulnerability that is a key part, a leveraging point, a gate, a snaking passageway, of an entire worldmodel change.

If there is a point where the two worldmodels touch, the ground that you walk on while exploring in the Loose Cognitive Science research lab land, is the foundation, Possibilism.

In the Possibilism landscape, there is a hidden beacon, leading up to the overhead plane, which is the world of the Eternalism worldmodel.

The control seizure Limit is the gateway, bridge, and path between the two worldmodels: from Possibilism to Eternalism.

Exploring the psychedelic entheogenic landscape, the Loose Cognitive Scientist — the student of Multistate Cognitive Science — comes across a glimpse of the hidden attracting beacon, the tractor beam into the central confrontation of Transcendent Knowledge of the Control Dependency Limit.

When the god pulls the maiden soul up to him, he seduces her, overpowers her to make her want him, and from this coupling, she dies/is violated (logically and experientially), and the godman is born, the divinized initiate and those who are experientially isomorphic with the godman, the offspring of the mind's transcendent passion desire to know control overpowering seizure limit, sacred classic psychedelic control instability, the holy destabilization of personal control power, overpowered by the power of the Holy Spirit which God made your serpent worldline make you ingest.

The flesh of that godman is the godman is one with the isomorphic initiate that the God has given to the godman.

— Professor Loosecog

Group: egodeath Message: 7974 From: egodeath Date: 24/06/2016
Subject: Re: Nondual unity = lesser mysteries != inside boundary
It is one thing to start to *experience* the Eternalism cognitive state, as with Martin Ball and Ken Wilber.

Thinkers or experiencers at this transitional, half-transformed developmental stage write theories of nondual unity consciousness, reflecting the sensation of the Eternalism state/mode of the mind.

It is another thing to *comprehend* the Eternalism cognitive state and its ramifications, recognizing Eternalism as such, and to comprehend the Eternalism innate mental worldmodel — the mind's mature form of operating system.

Copyright (C) 2016 Egodeath. All Rights Reserved.

Group: egodeath Message: 7975 From: egodeath Date: 24/06/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast
Episode 1: Cyber
Episode 2: Max
Episode 3: Paradigms
Episode 4: Ball
Episode 5: Nutt
Group: egodeath Message: 7977 From: egodeath Date: 25/06/2016
Subject: Re: Logical Scientific Discovery
Books about the Cognitive Science of Science

Creating Scientific Concepts
Nancy Nersessian
http://amazon.com/o/asin/0262515075
2010
Condensed blurb [with Egodeath theory connections]:

How novel scientific concepts arise.

The problem of conceptual change.

Novel concepts and profound insight don't burst forth in a blinding flash of inspiration. [My 1988 block universe noncontrol breakthrough brought together my 1987 idea development. My 2013 tree/snake Possibilism/Eternalism breakthrough tightened my 2011 work that refined and systematized my 2010 work.]

Novel concepts arise out of;
o An attempt to solve specific problems.
o Use of conceptual, analytical, and material resources.
o The cognitive, social, and cultural context of the problem.
o Dynamic processes of reasoning that extend ordinary cognition.

Cognitive science research, and historical accounts of scientific practices. Cognitive-historical approach. [My timestamped posts 2001 to present, and my 1987 notebooks and 1988 drafts and 1997 summary, provide a record for Loose Cognitive Scientists to study development of the Egodeath theory, a record of how I think (idea development) for creating the Theory.]

Scientific and ordinary cognition lie on a continuum;
Problem-solving practices in scientific cognition illuminate practices in ordinary cognition.
Problem-solving practices in ordinary cognition illuminate practices in scientific cognition.

[Problem-solving practices (rationality) in altered-state loose cognition illuminate practices in ordinary-state tight cognition.
Problem-solving practices in ordinary-state tight cognition illuminate practices in altered-state loose cognition.]

Conceptual change derives from:
o Use of analogies, imagistic representations [religious mythology metaphor as description].
o Thought experiments [pursuing and fleeing/retreating from the control-vulnerability attractor].
o Experimental investigations [cliche phrase "experimented with LSD" in place of "used LSD"].
o Mathematical analyses [looseness/time plot for redosing, Minkowski spacetime reference frames].

Constructed *models* as hybrid objects, serving as intermediaries between targets [non-metaphorical referent] and analogical sources [metaphors] in *bootstrapping* processes.

Cognitive operations and structures aid discovery.

A powerful form of reasoning: model-based reasoning.

Model-based reasoning generates novelty.

Mental modeling and analogy.

Cognitive Science and Philosophy of Science.

Maxwell's Electromagnetism equations.

/condensed blurb comments by Michael Hoffman, Egodeath theory

The *Cognitive* Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Hanne Andersen, Peter Barker
http://amazon.com/o/asin/0521855756/
2006

The Cognitive Science of Science: Explanation, Discovery, and Conceptual Change
Paul Thagard
http://amazon.com/o/asin/0262017288
2012

Interdisciplinary:
Cognitive Science: An Introduction to the Science of the Mind
José Luis Bermúdez
http://amazon.com/o/asin/1107653355
2014 2nd ed

Group: egodeath Message: 7979 From: egodeath Date: 25/06/2016
Subject: Redosing mushroom wine
Redosing mushroom wine

Sacred meal banqueting parties in Antiquity used a superior practice of extending and tempering the peak window of the mystic altered state:

o *Drinking* psilocybin wine, instead of eating mushrooms.

o *Redosing*, instead of a single dose with excessive peak and insufficient duration of the useful peak window.

This approach gives qualitatively different results, optimized.

Redosing enables controlling and extending the peak window of loose cognitive binding to reach the ideal target intensity and stay there for an extended duration, rather than a bell curve or triangle shape with constantly changing intensity ramping up and then immediately ramping down.

Using a short-duration psychedelic gives faster control over the speed of increase and the speed of descent.

A short-duration psychedelic makes it possible, through timed redosing, to rapidly rise to the desired level, *stay* at that constant level for the desired duration, and then *when desired*, rapidly descend to baseline.

The modern poor conventional approach of taking a single massive dose at one point in time is like going into a bar and immediately pounding five shots and then no more, versus Antiquity's redosing rounds which is like drinking one shot at a time staggered over hours.

— original research by Michael Hoffman, the Egodeath theorist.
Copyright (C) 2016 Egodeath. All Rights Reserved.

Group: egodeath Message: 7980 From: egodeath Date: 25/06/2016
Subject: Re: Logical Scientific Discovery
The wrongest idea is that the psychedelic state is non-rational.

The psychedelic state is high rationality.

— Michael Hoffman

Group: egodeath Message: 7981 From: egodeath Date: 25/06/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast
Episode 5 (critical analysis of Psychedelic Neuroscience) has quickly become the most popular of the first 5 episodes.

The Transcendent Knowledge podcast is exceptional, a model of high signal-noise ratio, cogency, impact, profundity, and relevance. There is practically no room for improvement in the content.

My only suggestion is about production, not content: use dynamic level *compression* or uniform speaking volume, on Cyber's voice, like Max's elocution; sometimes Cyber's voice is too loud or quiet.

Transcendent Knowledge Podcast, episode 5:
critical analysis of Psychedelic Neuroscience

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDCNo3URuhA&feature=youtu.be

Group: egodeath Message: 7982 From: egodeath Date: 25/06/2016
Subject: Against Physicalism
The "Knowledge Argument", qualia:
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Knowledge+Argument%22
Wik:
Argues against physicalism — the view that the universe, including all that is mental, is entirely physical. The debate that emerged following its publication became the subject of an edited volume — There's Something About Mary (2004) — which includes replies from such philosophers as Daniel Dennett, David Lewis, and Paul Churchland.

Max Freakout recommends:
Frank Jackson "What Mary Didn't Know"
https://www.google.com/search?q=Frank+jackson+%22What+mary+didn't+know%22
1986 [my first full year of theorizing]

Frank Jackson "Epiphenomenal Qualia"
1982
https://www.google.com/search?q=Frank+Jackson+%22Epiphenomenal+Qualia%22

There's Something About Mary: Essays on Phenomenal Consciousness and Frank Jackson's Knowledge Argument
Peter Ludlow (Editor), Yujin Nagasawa (Editor)…
http://amazon.com/o/asin/0262122723

Group: egodeath Message: 7983 From: egodeath Date: 25/06/2016
Subject: Re: Against Physicalism
Group: egodeath Message: 7984 From: egodeath Date: 25/06/2016
Subject: Re: Against Physicalism
Interestingly Esoteric:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panpsychism

I haven't yet disambiguated what m. Freakout has in mind when he says 'Idealism', in contrast to Materialism/Physicalism.

Group: egodeath Message: 7985 From: egodeath Date: 25/06/2016
Subject: Re: Against Physicalism
Group: egodeath Message: 7986 From: egodeath Date: 25/06/2016
Subject: Re: Against Physicalism
Wik, condensed and clarified formatting by Michael Hoffman:

Panpsychism agrees with idealism: everything is mental.

Idealism treats most things as mental content or ideas.

Panspychism treats most things as mind-like, and as having their own reality.

For all minds, there is a single, external, spatio-temporal world.

Panpsychism is not a doctrine of the unreality of the spatio-temporal world perceived through the senses.

Panpsychism is not reduction of the spatio-temporal world to mere "ideas" in the human or divine mind.

The constituents of the spatio-temporal world are just as real as minds.

Panpsychism asserts the reality of nature.

/wik

Group: egodeath Message: 7990 From: egodeath Date: 25/06/2016
Subject: Re: Against Physicalism
Arminian Calvinism (including hyper-Calvinism) asserts:

No-free-will, and moral culpability warranting punishment-Hell and reward-Heaven.

Ontological Idealism, or Panpsychism, asserts:

Everything is mental, and the physical is real.

This only *seems* plainly logically contradictory (magical-thinking irrationalism), to sinful fallen minds.

Systematic Theology explains that once we have Transcendent Knowledge, mental regeneration, some kind of rational inspired-state based theory of ego transcendence given at the end of time in a new dispensation, we will then understand, like God, how illogic is logical, how plain logical self-contradiction is logical consistency.

This only *seems* like arm-waving apologetics for failed, incoherent thinking, to the sin-clouded fallen mind.

We promise, with speculation and conjecture, that these plain inconsistencies and logical gibberish will surely be resolved in the altered state of transrational God-consciousness.

— Confused, fallen, sin-clouded systematic Reformed theologians, experts at Possibilist Eternalism

Group: egodeath Message: 7992 From: egodeath Date: 25/06/2016
Subject: Pocket computer-phone + clamshell keyboard + desktop peripherals
Pocket computer-phone + clamshell keyboard + desktop peripherals

A peripherals and case system designed around a pocket-sized phone-computer.

I'm (experimenting with) using the "Logitech Keys-To-Go Ultra-Portable Bluetooth Keyboard for iPad" used with iPhone.

I probably should have bought the iPad case version of this keyboard.

I have been experimenting with writing technology and techniques since I was inspired to capture rapid ideas in October 1985 at the start of forming the Egodeath theory.

1987 was the year I fully developed my hand writing technique for idea development and also learned rapid keyboarding on an IBM PC/DOS environment, with monospace text, using acronyms.

In January 1988, I extended that keyboarding technique to Microsoft Word on Mac.

The weirdest communication-technology experience now is using a wireless portable Bluetooth keyboard Logitech together with an iPhone 6 Plus.

When the physical keyboard is connected to the smartphone, the soft (onscreen touch) keyboard goes away, so aside from the UI chrome of the Notes text editing app, I now have the entire 5.5" screen.

This screen has 400 pixels per inch. You can't even see the pixel-grid with a magnify glass.

There are lots of bugs, hangs, a non-tested (non-QA'd wilderness). Sometimes my acronyms auto-expand, sometimes they don't (Settings: General: Keyboard: Text Replacement).

When I go to that Settings page, for awhile, 'edt' auto-expands to "the Egodeath theory". Then it stops working.

The iPhone — the smartphone — has LOTS of room for improvement.

We are a long way from proper, designed, tested *docking* as a coherent, experience-driven, *designed* system approach.

Vastly better than this ultra-portable flat separate keyboard would be a clamshell case keyboard for snap-in fastening to the iPhone in both orientations.

The phone *has to* fasten to the keyboard, because half the UI involves pushing the screen with your finger.

My hands are typing, so I have to have some other way than holding with my hand, to keep the phone stationary.

The iPad clamshell-case version of this Logitech flat Bluetooth keyboard would work much better, because a firm requirement is to keep the touch-UI phone from moving around, and holding it in (angled) position.

The ikross portable stand fails to keep the phone stationary when using touch and multitouch UI.

The designer/programmers of tech are still thinking in terms of desktop-first, not mobile-first.

Stop assuming you and the audience have all-in-one laptop, docked laptop, and desktop multi-component peripherals setups.

Use those as a reference point that sets a high bar to meet.

Use a peripherals and case system designed around a pocket-sized phone-computer.

You must like me here *live in* the docking world centered around the phone, not around the laptop.

It needs to be a pocket-sized Microsoft Surface with (both portable and desk) peripherals support.

Surface is a Windows (desktop-OS) tablet, with detachable *clamshell* keyboard forming a stable clamshell where when using the keyboard, the keyboard attaches securely to the screen/CPU.

Needed is an OS environment that's like a phone and tablet and laptop-desktop, pocket sized screen with soft keyboard, and attachable physical keyboard.

The setup must function both ways:

As a *portable* pheripherals system like this super light thin Bluetooth keyboard (but must fasten the keyboard stably to the phone).

I balance the ikross portable phone stand) on the keyboard, a solution which doesn't work.

Ditch the separate stand, and instead fasten the phone to the keyboard (both orientations).

The usage scenario is to always have the phone with me, and do everything on it not the laptop, and use this phone as the brain (or mind) with a set of portable or stationary peripherals:

o Phone by itself
o Stationary peripherals
o Portable peripherals (keyboard fastens to phone)

As a fixed, full-size, desk-top peripherals system

I'm simultaneously Bluetoothing out to a portable speaker at the same time as using the physical Bluetooth keyboard, playing the Transcendent Knowledge podcast. It partially, sometimes works. I'm living in the tech wilderness.

When Siri reads aloud a selected passage of this Notes app text file, the music or video (podcast) volume from the Chrome or Safari app with Youtube is ducked down to half-volume, with Siri reading over it.

I have yet to experiment with mixing text inputs: soft keyboard, physical keyboard, and voice recognition dictation.

The biggest reason why I didn't continue experimenting (until now) with using this Bluetooth keyboard with this iPhone is the inefficient *Apple keyboarding design*, which is keyboard layout in conjunction with keyboard control of iOS and apps.

I need to get a clamshell case keyboard — even if just the iPad Logitech one.

I need to learn this existing keyboard's layout and how it controls the iPhone, in conjunction with the touchscreen UI.

The biggest hurdle or impediment to efficiency: God is wrathful: my keyboard+phone setup is an Apple keyboarding design, which is less efficient (number of keystrokes) than Windows' keyboarding design.

Microsoft Windows Phone with a Bluetooth Windows Phone keyboard would potentially enable more powerful, efficient keyboarding than iPhone with Bluetooth iOS keyboard.

Keyboarding support in Apple Mac and Apple iPhone is inferior to Microsoft Windows, regarding the keyboard layout in conjunction with how the key combinations control the OS and apps.

IBM Presentation Manager had no assumption that there exists a mouse or pointing device connected; all actions had to be *efficiently* supported by keyboarding.

Apple lacks efficient keyboard support; keyboarding on Apple is twice as hard as on Windows.

Mac has no underscore character for direct-access with the Alt key.

This iPhone phablet fastened in clamshell-case fashion to a sturdy keyboard could make quite a comfortable literal lap-top "netbook" (tiny laptop).

Changing the phone orientation changes the balance and angle of the lap-top or table-top clamshell arrangement.

This separate keyboard and stand and pocket phone-computer (and speaker) is not very good, not a sweet spot.

A clamshell keyboard case fastened to a pocket touchscreen phone-computer is great.

We need a Microsoft Surface but with pocket cellphone-capability computer, instead of big tablet, is the next tech sweet spot in computers and smartphones, phablets and tablets.

We need an OS environment that is in-between desktop and smartphone/tablet, more capable than a smartphone, to support clamshell-case multitasking and vigorous keyboarding and touchscreen pressing – but still fully usable in pocket size, with no physical keyboard clamshell case.

This 3-part setup (flimsy stand, separate keyboard, and phone) is an embarrassment and I refuse to show people my using this poor system as if I recommend it.

A sturdy clamshell keyboard case that firmly holds the touch phone at an adjustable angle, I would be seen using, spreading that approach-meme.

— Michael Hoffman, idea developer, regarding idea development tools and techniques.

Group: egodeath Message: 7993 From: egodeath Date: 25/06/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast
This podcast series is a powerful constructive critical analysis.

This is a valuable fully critical analysis, with constructive analysis and recommendations.

This podcast series has birds commenting in it, and a magic bus makes a stop here, on its way to losing control steering around a high mountain corner, a skid, an extended silent fall, and crash explosion below.

— Michael Hoffman, certified therapist, trip guide, tour guide, sitter, Shamanic Psychotherapist, cognition healer, magician, hierophant, priestly magus magician, professional official sacrificer, teacher, high Philosopher, and state-licensed exorcist

Group: egodeath Message: 7994 From: egodeath Date: 26/06/2016
Subject: Re: Pocket computer-phone + clamshell keyboard + desktop peripherals
I invested massive time in recovering my 1987 Hand, experimenting with rapid keyboarding, a pen collection, mechanical lead softness, and other technologies (per Erik Davis) of capturing spirit-world (transcendent) idea-content.

I am enjoying complete success in rigging up an equivalent to the "Microsoft Universal Mobile Keyboard" for iPad, iPhone, Android devices, and Windows tablets.

I taped the Bluetooth keyboard to a stiff folder, and I taped my portable folding stand to the stiff folder. I can use this pocket phone-computer in either orientation, on my lap, vigorously keyboarding and touching the screen, in either orientation.

In portrait mode, I can touch firmly on the top of the screen without the phone-computer falling off.

Apparently comparable to my successful improvised setup:
http://amazon.com/Microsoft-Universal-Keyboard-Android-devices/dp/B00GWGLUZ0/

I plan to check this out in the Microsoft store. The ultimate test is can it work stably on the lap, while pressing fingers on the screen. My improvised setup can do this well.

I am not aiming for tiny ultraportable. I am aiming for netbook-sized good near-fullsized keyboard.

My proof-of-concept setup is more stable in landscape mode.

I like fullsized text on the screen, and landscape mode works best for me for that, most of the time.

Hard to predict, because this overall setup is a different usage approach than the phone by itself, or the awful multipart setup not fastened together (phone-computer, stand, and keyboard flying all over the place).

So I plan to post, sketch, upload pics, listen to podcasts, etc. The phone is freely floating on the stand, yet stable. I can pick it up to photo the cat, or whatnot.

I can effortlessly lift the phone, turn its orientation, and set it back on the stable stand.

The proof of concept is successful. This is the way to go, the way of the future.

*Not* extremist portability, but rather, a sweet spot in-between a netbook (tiny laptop) and a phablet.

Not an infernal microkeyboard with evil square grid of letter keys.

Light, near-fullsized, staggered rows of keys (standard Mac laptop keyboard layout, except the Logitech iOS keyboard has buttons for Desktop (Home) and for "show all open apps").

This improvised setup (keyboard and portable folding smartphone stand taped to a rigid folder) is rock-solid for multitouch in conjunction with physical keyboard (touch instead of mouse), especially in landscape orientation, but very stable in portrait orientation too.

So this series of posts I expect to do will be with smartphone (iPhone 6 Plus 5.5"), but using the entire screen for seeing my text — not soft keyboard taking up 1/3 of the screen — and physical, efficient keyboard.

Now I have to figure out a usage approach combining voice dictation of my Siri development — that is, my Theory development — combined with efficient fast keyboarding to correct the totally botched voice misrecognition.

Voice dictation with the fan in the window:

The first attempt was abortive: I had my Jambox Bluetooth speaker connected, and its mic was being used instead of the phone's. This can be good: I can hold the speaker in my hand and dictate into it, then put it aside to correct text with my keyboard.

Voice dictation take 2: speaking into jambox holding jambox speaker like a mic:

[voice dictation:]
This is a test of the jam box as a microphone as a microphone to dictate my theory to Siri so that I can look away from the screen and dictate great profundity though I do expect I do have to watch out for a bug where iPhone Starks [starts] deleting text as fast as I [it] can but I have updated the iOS operating system.

But voice dictation shuts off after 20 or 30 seconds so you do it in bursts.

You say the following words for punctuation:

[utterances:]
period
newline
quote
closequote
apostrophe
spacebar
comma
hyphen
dash
openparen
closeparen
smiley
frowny
allcapson
allcapsoff
exclamationmark

In the (outdated) iPhone 8 User Guide, find "dictate text" or "add punctuation". The list shown there lacks many of the punctuation marks that I figured out by experimentation above.

Here is a demonstration of dictating punctuation:

[voice dictation; added comments in square brackets afterwards:]

Then Professor not [Nutt] said "the default mode network" is a "hub" to gain money for my big machine through half-baked ill-digested pop scientific "make shit up" terminology to impress the groups. " [rubes; voice recognition initially got "rubes" correct, but then changed it.] The professor's ideas are ill-digested. [had to say "professor apostrophe s"]

[voice dictation:]
It is a little strange having to use the soft keyboard; that is, touching the microphone key on the screen, to initiate a 30-2nd [30-second] voice dictation "session".

I might end up dictating words only, not punctuation, and then using the physical keyboard to correct and punctuate the trainwreck voice-misrecognition results which initially look like a telegraph message.

Test of voice dictation in telegraph style:
I AM SENDING YOU THIS TELEGRAPH MESSAGE STOP YOU DON'T NEED TO SAY THE WORD STOP AT THE END OF A TELEGRAPH MESSAGE AS EVERYONE KNOW IN ORDER TO SAVE MONEY BY OMITTING UNNECESSARY WORDS FROM YOUR TELEGRAPH MESSAGE BECAUSE THEY CHARGE BY THE WORD AND EACH Punctuation mark is charged as PUNCTUATION MARK IS CHARGED AS A FULL WORD STOP PUNCTUATION IS VERY EXPENSIVE

Test of saying "all caps on" for shouting, terminating in "all caps off":

I said PROFESSOR NOT [NUTT] IS INCORPORATING HALF-BAKED POORLY JUSTIFIED PSEUDOSCIENTIFIC FOLK OUTDATED SO CALLED COGNITIVE MADE-UP STUFF!

— Michael Hoffman the dictator
[I vocalized that as:
hyphen hyphen spacebar michael hoffman the dictator]

Group: egodeath Message: 7995 From: egodeath Date: 26/06/2016
Subject: Re: Pocket computer-phone + clamshell keyboard + desktop peripherals
As a demo, this posting is (mostly) voice dictation only, without using physical keyboard to cleanup, to demonstrate the limitations of the result of the first, voice-dictation phase (voice mis-recognition), without cleanup. The below posting is enough demo. I plan to post keyboard-cleaned-up voice dictation, a combination of voice dictation and physical keyboarding, in subsequence posts, after this.

[voice dictation, no cleanup:]
Now in this posting I am beginning to develop a technique combining voice dictation with substantial on topic content then using the fast physical keyboard to clean up the results.

Time out for the healing medication now soon.

The ultimate peak of profundity is the loose cognitive state voice dictation rapid hard raining hard fox in the downpour of thoughts.

This is Darren and efficient way of dictating
this is then and fish and way of dictating ideas but it is crucial to enunciate clearly and then be in a visionary state through the traditional method that mystics used the natural traditional method. Not the unnatural untraditional method.

The combination of methods of capturing rapid ideas here is to speak with voice dictation running capturing messy misrecognition and then afterwards using fast physical keyboard to clean up the mess he train wreck of a result.

When I am working on techniques and technologies for capturing rapid ideas the mechanics dominatrix and distract from
no I said those mechanics dominate and distract from the ego death theory Contant.

[typed on great prototype keyboard-fastened-to-phone-stand setup:]

For voice dictation, I need the soft keyboard onscreen, to touch the Mic key onscreen. But for keyboard-based cleanup and typing, I want the soft onscreen keyboard to disappear. This Logitech keyboard has a "keyboard" key to show/hide the soft keyboard. The whole system is tenuous, inconsistent, unreliable — the weirdest text-editing system today, and the most advanced (near-futuristic): pocket computer/phone, with optional peripherals (Bluetooth "docking") to form the pocket computer/phone equivalent of a netbook.

Practicing saying my sig (each punctuation mark can require uttering one or more words — very unnatural):
[voice dictation without keyboard-based cleanup:]
— Michael Hoffman

Group: egodeath Message: 7996 From: egodeath Date: 26/06/2016
Subject: Re: Against Physicalism
[Composed on phone with a phone stand and keyboard taped to a rigid folder like a mini-laptop:]

A powerful practical attitude is being agnostic about the way in which the referent physical world exists.

Better than saying "I am agnostic about whether the physical world exists" is saying "I am agnostic about the nature of the existence of the physical world."

Some kind of physical world can be postulated to exist, but the nature of this existence is unclear.

Even the ego has a kind of existence, like a virtual image studied and calculated mathematically in Newton's Optics.

The ego definitely exists — as a shade, shadow, illusion, virtual image, or structuring pattern that has the capability of collapsing.

The realm of mental constructs is known to exist (as mental constructs, however those are created or projected by the brain or by the mind of God) because awareness directly perceives mental constructs (not the referent realm; not the material physical realm).

— Michael Hoffman

Group: egodeath Message: 7997 From: egodeath Date: 26/06/2016
Subject: Re: Neurobollocks
The most important scientific takeaway from Professor Nutt's Psychedelic Neurophrenology brain-aura spirit-world photographs, is that tripping balls occurs because the brain has LOTS OF ORANGE!!

That explains and solves at long last, the great mystery of how the default mode network and hub and ego dissolution and oneness works.

— Professor Loosecog

(Typed on a phone-based netbook.)

Group: egodeath Message: 7998 From: egodeath Date: 26/06/2016
Subject: Re: Pocket computer-phone + clamshell keyboard + desktop peripherals
As an immediate payoff of typing on a *phone-based netbook* (small laptop), I expect fewer typos and better writing than when using soft keyboard and voice dictation/recognition.

My writing quality is poorest when using soft keyboard and voice dictation. In theory, some of the best ideas come this way, by imposing constraints. If each word is expensive/inconvenient/difficult to compose, only the best ideas will make it through, will be worth the inefficient effort of composing, laboriously typing-up.

As everyone knows in 1970, the masters use voice recording — thinkers, purely intellectual workers.

The slaves are the typist secretaries, manual laborers, who transcribe those ideas from pure spoken recorded form, to lowly textual form.

No businessman knows how to type. The typewritist girl is trained to do that manual labor, which an executive should not know how to do, and should hide any typing skill he has the misfortune to have.

My most brilliant ideas involve no typing, purely dictating to my sec'y-slave about my breakthrough Siri. See, my secretary-slave Siri is dumb, and makes lots of mistakes; my actual ideas in my mind are wise, clear, and learned, though the text Siri writes for me is filled with folly, gibberish, and ignorance.

My writing quality is best when using a full-size keyboard, desktop OS, and large monitor. Especially Word on Windows laptop with separate ergonomic keyboard and large monitor and wireless mouse — like most of my 2010-2012 postings.

Not sure when I transitioned from laptop to phone — I really should've noted that important tool point. But it happened gradually and not that consciously. Searching posts on "phone" should give some indication.

I want to see how my writing quality plummetted after switching from Windows laptop workstation to iPhone 4 (3.5" screen) smartphone.

And then got better with the iPhone 6 Plus (5.5" screen) phablet with soft keyboard,

And is now getting better with the iPhone cradled and secured to a near full-sized Bluetooth keyboard. This is a sweet spot:

o Pocket portability with soft keyboard, alternating with:
o More efficient keyboarding with the near-fullsize physical keyboard (used in conjunction with the large smartphone's press-the-screen UI, in either orientation), phone secured to keyboard so stable on the lap as well as flat table.

— Michael Hoffman, capturer of a downpour of cognition

Group: egodeath Message: 8000 From: egodeath Date: 26/06/2016
Subject: Re: Neurobollocks
If you're interested in Professor Nutt's Psychedelic Neurophrenology fMRI brain-scamming photographs, you'll also be interested in these related, more established spiritual technologies:

Kirlian photography
http://google.com/search?q=Kirlian+photography&tbm=isch

Spirit photographs
http://google.com/search?q=spirit+photograph&tbm=isch

Phrenology charts
https://www.google.com/search?q=phrenology&tbm=isch

— Professor Loosecog

Group: egodeath Message: 8001 From: egodeath Date: 26/06/2016
Subject: Re: Against Physicalism
Metaphor decoding:

Dirtiness/pollution/uncleanness/sickness/broken/demon-possessed child = the mind is still immersed in the Possibilism mental worldmodel of self-in-world.

Clean/purified/cleansed/healed/completed/perfected/repaired/adult = the mind has the fully developed Eternalism mental worldmodel of self-in-world.

Washing the mind in fire, to transform Possibilism to Eternalism, occurs through a series of entheogen sessions, where each session can be psilocybin wine, redosed in multiple timed rounds.

Other gurus brainwash. The Egodeath theory is about mindwashing.

Cognitive Purification through fire stolen from the gods that burns away the Possibilism illusion, burning bush-branches of future apparent possibilities (and virtual-only possibilities in the past), along with burning away the innate temporary mental structure, of personal agency weilding power of steering through the imagined possibility branching.

The fire that Prometheus stole from the gods is the fire that burns away Possibilism thinking and transforms cognition into the salamander-form Eternalism framework.

By passing the king's son through the fire each night, the goddess immortalizes him, burning away the transient youthful vestigial Possibilism thinking, so that what remains, indestructible, lasting, and permanent, is Eternalism thinking.

— Michael Hoffman

Group: egodeath Message: 8002 From: egodeath Date: 26/06/2016
Subject: Loose Cognitive Science: Cognitive Science on Psilocybin
Loose Cognitive Science: Cognitive Science on Psilocybin

What percentage and number of Cognitive Scientists have a high interest in psychedelics, under the extremely distorting, repressive, coercive conditions of Prohibition? 50%

What percentage and number of Cognitive Scientists *would* have a high interest in Psychedelics, without the extremely distorting, repressive, coercive conditions of Prohibition? 100%

— Cybermonk

Group: egodeath Message: 8005 From: egodeath Date: 26/06/2016
Subject: Re: The religion of Christian Cybernetic Egodeath
Miraculous Metaphors

In the Book of Revelation at the end of time, those who are isomorphic with the godman puppet-king who drank the cup of mixed wine and dreaded the trial ordeal and sovereignty death, receive:

Salvation
Eternal life
Forgiveness of sin
Redemption
Death overcome
Ability to work wonders: healing, raising & calming storms; exorcism, handling snakes without harm, and more
Clothing washed white
Rescue from the flames
Immortality
Regeneration
Purification
Healing
Peace
Harmony
A new world
Presence with God
Access to go in and out of the garden and wedding banquet without harm
No more enmity with the asp

— Michael

Group: egodeath Message: 8006 From: egodeath Date: 26/06/2016
Subject: Re: Loose Cognitive Science: Cognitive Science on Psilocybin
How Science approaches figuring out Transcendent Knowledge.

What kind of approach does Science use, to study altered-state cognition and control-dynamics?

The question is not a simplistic binary of the Egodeath theory is/isn't Science.

Not "Are you Christian?", but "What type of Christian are you?" As in, exoteric or esoteric.

Not "Is the Egodeath theory Science?", but "What kind of Science is the Egodeath theory?"

The approach I have taken, 1985-2016, is definitive of the kind of Science that is effective for modelling and figuring out religious mythology and transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism.

— Michael Hoffman

Group: egodeath Message: 8007 From: egodeath Date: 26/06/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast
No more giving assertions about psychedelics and psychedelic experiential spirituality an automatic "pass".

For the first time, assertions about psychedelics are being subjected to critical analysis by the most well-informed psychedelicists, to see what debatable, sketchy assumptions are being foisted off and lapped up by people.

No more blank-check acceptance of anything any psychedelicist claims.

As assessed by highly experienced psychedelicists, do any of Martin Ball's New Age Psychedelic Spirituality ideas hold up to critical assessment?

What aspects are valid, and which aspects don't hold up to critical scrutiny?

— Michael Hoffman

Group: egodeath Message: 8008 From: egodeath Date: 27/06/2016
Subject: Re: Neurobollocks
http://neurobollocks.wordpress.com

To put the Egodeath theory on a solid reductionist scientistic basis, replace the Cognitive (software) lexicon in the Egodeath theory by rewording into equivalent brain/neuron (hardware) wording jumbled together with folk sub-theoretical, cliche descriptions of psychedelic experiencing.

The degree of meaningfulness and relevance to experiencing plummets, but that's worth the tremendous increase in the appearance of scientific substance and credibility.

mental model –> neural model

cognitive structure –> neural structure

transformation of the mental model from Possibilism to Eternalism –> transformation of the neural structuring from Possibilism to Eternalism

loose cognitive association binding –> increased neuroplasticity

mental construct processing –> neural structure dynamics

dynamic mental construct –> associational neural structure

initial, Possibilism mental worldmodel –> initial, Possibilism network of brain structures

mental model of personal agency steering forward in time through multipossibility branching –> the default mode network

mental model transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism –> ego dissolution due to suspension of filtering

experiencing of Eternalism as fastening and helpless embeddedness in the spacetime block –> sense of oneness and nondual unity consciousness

— Michael Hoffman

Group: egodeath Message: 8009 From: egodeath Date: 27/06/2016
Subject: Bk: Aiken: Meditation and Entheogens
Explorations in Awareness: Finding God by Meditating with Entheogens
John Aiken
http://amazon.com/dp/1579512321/
planned November 2016
Group: egodeath Message: 8010 From: egodeath Date: 27/06/2016
Subject: Re: Against Physicalism
contamination
Group: egodeath Message: 8011 From: egodeath Date: 27/06/2016
Subject: Nondual unity’s shadow = control seizure gate
Nondual unity's shadow = control seizure gate

The control seizure attractor gate
is the "shadow" side of
nondual unity experiencing.

— Michael Hoffman

Keywords: shadow psychedelic

Psychedelic Psychotherapy and the Shadow
Ann Shulgin
https://psychedelicsalon.com/podcast-021-psychedelic-psychotherapy-and-the-shadow/

Understanding the Shadow
Ann Shulgin
http://2013.psychedelicscience.org/18-conference-workshops/97-q-a-session-understanding-the-shadow.html
Abstract:

Every child born in this world needs to be "socialized," in order to take his or her place among others and to be accepted.

Such socializing consists of being taught to repress certain instincts and desires, and to emphasize with others.

The accumulation of so-called "undesirable" and un-lovable traits over the years becomes a hidden, unconscious monster figure, buried in the basement of each adult psyche, gaining power in the dark, glimpsed only when there is a breakdown of the usual constraints.

Many Shadow monsters show themselves when their owners get drunk or take too much of the wrong drug.

Spiritual growth and ultimate enlightenment can occur only when the Shadow is brought into the light; when its owner is able to see it and acknowledge its existence.

Until this occurs, the Shadow is experienced only in projection—on other people, on other races, other nations, and other Gods—thus causing, among other things, wars without end.

/shulgin

Group: egodeath Message: 8012 From: egodeath Date: 27/06/2016
Subject: Re: Narrowing the gate
This is the book which I got from the car service center waiting room library.

Spiritual Disciplines: Papers from the Eranos Yearbooks
Joseph Campbell (Editor)
http://amazon.com/dp/0691018634
1960/1985
Bollingen Series XXX : 4
Princeton

Article in the book:
C. Kerenyi
Man and Mask
1948

Kerenyi is useful in this article "Man and Mask" as usual. Religion in Mediterranean Antiquity.

Kerenyi vs. the Egodeath theory, would be interesting. Cybernetics, Dissociation, Determinism, Metaphor: where does he stand?

The Transcendent Knowledge podcasts help develop a truly helpful ability to articulate and identify, compare and contrast, any pop theory vs. the Egodeath theory. Any brand of approach to the mind and religious mythology.

Examples of brands to compare & contrast to the Egodeath theory:

Jung & Jungian psychotherapy.

(Early) Ken Wilber combines lower, developmental psychology from the West, with higher, spirituality from the East.

My first point of reference in my explanation of religion is the Bible and Mediterranean Antiquity, and Rock (not Meditation, not Eastern religion though Watts was central, not religion in the Middle Ages; not much Catholic religion).

Reformed Theology (degrees of impure, Arminian-contaminated Calvinism) is important to compare & contrast.

My second point of reference is everything else, such as world religious mythology across history.

My first point of reference is Mediterranean Antiquity and the Ancient Near East. My second point of reference is everything else.

My Theory is specifically intent on figuring out Western religion including Judeo-Chrestian-into-Christian, and Greco-Roman mythic culture.

Explaining global religious mythology is a requirement for a good theory.

My specialty and first priority for deepest connection is, broadly, Mediterranean Antiquity, the meaning-context and complex which produced Christianity.

The most interesting time may be around 150 CE.

— Michael Hoffman

Group: egodeath Message: 8013 From: egodeath Date: 28/06/2016
Subject: Uninspired skepticism
Potentially relevant topics at skepdic.com.

I am the only theorist of the altered state who is a skeptic, rationalist, anti-paranormal. With a theory of religious mythology that is based in the altered state, strict rationality, domain-specific metaphor decoding where the domain is altered-state rational phenomenology.

Most skeptical thinking is infertile, fruitless, impotent; it can only explain how things don't work, and what's wrong with common ways of thinking about various topics. Shallow, uninspired, OSC-based skepticism typically leads away from coherent, deep comprehension.

The most wrong and embarrassing skeptics' theories are rationally explaining-away mythic metaphor.

Skeptics critque at a level just as crude as the magical thinking they reject.

Skeptics tend to remain rooted in Literalist OSC Possibilism.

Skepticism fails to switch thinking from Literalist OSC Possibilism to Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism.

Skeptics typically are low, egoic-thinking, exoteric, literalist skeptics.

The inner initiates are high, transcendent-thinking, esoteric, metaphor-mastering Believers.

To _Believe_ is to {have Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism thinking}, as opposed to only having Literalist OSC Possibilism thinking.

Things get truly weird when you reject weird things: OMG it's a machine universe, no-free-will, monopossibility, horrors, the idea kills me!

Take away my ego, ok, but don't take away my precious freewill power and possibility-branching world!

Sam Harris uncomprehendingly babbles about no-free-will being superior to religion, when no-free-will is the position of mature religion, esoteric exorcism.

— Michael Hoffman

Skepdic lacks a mythology article, because myth is true.

They have no "drug war" or "Prohibition" article; the site doesn't consider the drug war and drug prohibition a sham.

They have no meditation article.
https://www.google.com/search?domains=skepdic.com&q=Meditation&sa=Search&sitesearch=skepdic.com
________________________
"Therapy" paradigm:

New Age psychotherapies:
http://skepdic.com/therapy.html
energy (New Age):
http://skepdic.com/energy.html
http://skepdic.com/jung.html
http://skepdic.com/unconscious.html
http://skepdic.com/collectiveun.html
http://skepdic.com/dreams.html
substance abuse treatment:
http://skepdic.com/sat.html
Psychology:
http://skepdic.com/psych.html
Parapsychology:
http://skepdic.com/parapsy.html

House of Cards – Psychology and Psychotherapy Built on Myth
Robyn Dawes, 1994
http://amazon.com/dp/0684830914
_____________________
Theory of knowledge:

philosophical materialism (physicalism):
http://skepdic.com/materialism.html
http://skepdic.com/mind.html
http://skepdic.com/empiricism.html
http://skepdic.com/science.html
http://skepdic.com/scientism.html
Pseudoscience:
http://skepdic.com/pseudosc.html
paradigm shift:
http://skepdic.com/paradigm.html
http://skepdic.com/positivism.html
http://skepdic.com/speedreading.html
_______________________
no-free-will:

http://skepdic.com/determinism.html
http://skepdic.com/freewill.html
_____________________________
Mythical sh*t:

http://skepdic.com/exorcism.html
http://skepdic.com/resurrection.html
http://skepdic.com/prayer.html
http://skepdic.com/reincarn.html
the Egodeath theory:
http://skepdic.com/egodeath.html
altered states of consciousness:
http://skepdic.com/altstates.html
near-death experiences:
http://skepdic.com/nde.html
http://skepdic.com/dejavu.html
the incorruptible body:
http://skepdic.com/incorrupt.html
Cannabis:
http://skepdic.com/ricksimpson.html
http://skepdic.com/shamanism.html

— Michael Hoffman

Group: egodeath Message: 8014 From: egodeath Date: 29/06/2016
Subject: Re: Intellectual autobiography & origins of Egodeath theory
When my father was dying of cancer he could've tripped In the tired and uninspired way that is advocated in the latest books about the Renaissance of Psychedelic Academic Science — but more importantly, his whole life was lacking the traditional classic psychedelic loosecog altered state.

My father was an *ordinary-state*-based New Age, Human Potential transpersonal therapist/counsellor.

My father and I did New Age spirituality together.

I grew up Jewish / Primitive Christian / New Age / Occult, in a culture and era in which psychedelics were presented favorably as a matter of enlightenment and natural coming of age, and cannabis was becoming legal.

We were hippie children of the 1970s within FM radio distance of San Francisco and Silicon Valley.

My father gave me early Wilber, and Watts, encounter groups, holotropic breathwork, and gave me a brain dump of the latest 1980-1986 Humanistic Psychology, Holistic Health, and Transpersonal Psychology while mountain hiking all over California with Mendocino shake, motorcycle, and convertible sports car.

Creating the Egodeath theory began with reading Wilber and Watts, ending up using a variant of Watts as an alternative to Wilber; 1988: {Psychedelic Eternalism}, vs. {nondual unity oneness}.

— Michael Hoffman

Group: egodeath Message: 8015 From: egodeath Date: 29/06/2016
Subject: Re: Intellectual autobiography & origins of Egodeath theory
When my father was dying of cancer he could've tripped In the tired and uninspired way that is advocated in the latest books about the Renaissance of Psychedelic Academic Science — but more importantly, his whole life was lacking the traditional classic psychedelic loosecog altered state.

My father was an *ordinary-state*-based New Age, Human Potential transpersonal therapist/counsellor.

My father and I did New Age spirituality together.

I grew up Jewish / Primitive Christian / New Age / Occult, in a culture and era in which psychedelics were presented favorably as a matter of enlightenment and natural coming of age, and cannabis was becoming legal.

It was not today's attitude of generational war of "us against drugs in order to keep children from desiring drugs", any amount of mayhem committed by prohibitionists against the whole populace "on behalf of keeping drugs away from children".

In the 70s into 80s the attitude of adults was like "assist the children to trip healthy, they are our psychedelic future". I grew up in the least drug-averse / most drug-positive area and era.

We were hippie children of the 1970s within FM radio distance of San Francisco and Silicon Valley.

My father gave me early Wilber, and Watts, encounter groups, holotropic breathwork, and gave me a brain dump of the latest 1980-1986 Humanistic Psychology, Holistic Health, and Transpersonal Psychology while mountain hiking all over California with Mendocino shake, motorcycle, and convertible sports car.

Creating the Egodeath theory began with reading Wilber and Watts, ending up using a variant of Watts as an alternative to Wilber; 1988: {Psychedelic Eternalism noncontrol}, vs. {nondual unity oneness through drug-free meditation}.

— Michael Hoffman

Group: egodeath Message: 8016 From: egodeath Date: 29/06/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast
The well-informed critical mentality from the Transcendent Knowledge Podcast amplified my thinking so that when I came across this article again, I didn't recognize it.

Worthy of criticism:
http://realitysandwich.com/241823/the-second-psychedelic-revolution-part-six-a-new-earth/

What's wrong with his word-choice?

What aspects did he get almost right?

What specific aspects did he get wrong?

What strategic doubtful moves does he make?

Does each of his assertions hold up to critique and testing?

Are his assertions arbitrary, or forced upon us by reason and evidence?

What cliche expressions and assumption-sets, what interpretive paradigms does he write from within?

What brand of value-systems does he combine?

How is Prohibition Compliance reflected in his writing or positions?

What promises and expectations does he load onto entheogens?

Does he hold the minimal, moderate, or maximal entheogen theory of religious history?
_____________________

I quickly read (skimmed?) this set of 6 good articles the first time maybe 6 months ago, but when I came across the 6th article out of context after Transcendent Knowledge podcasts, I didn't recognize it: my engagement with this article had much more traction, more interesting *specific* criticisms and spotting needed modifications, including word choice, and also more specific identification this time (before I recognized it from 6 months ago) of what is good about this article.

Reading http://skepdic.com is not my recommendation, except if you want to study the uninspired, conventional, immature *Literalist Ordinary-state Possibilism* version of Skeptic thinking. The domain name should be:
inexperiencedskepdic.com
oscbasedskepdic.com
immatureskepdic.com

The Transcendent Knowledge podcasts get my top recommendation. Hear this first, together with my own talking.

I recommend reading this 6th part of a set of articles, in a particular way like I just did:

What's wrong with his word-choice?

What aspects did he get almost right?

What specific aspects did he get wrong?

This is the style of approach, not my rushing over the set of articles some 6 months ago, but getting fast at slowing down and identifying specific pros/cons of an article.

The Transcendent Knowledge podcasts amplify and articulate the approach I ideally use to read.

The Transcendent Knowledge podcasts have made this technique clear: articulate, be specific and descriptive of different aspects of a (psychedelic) topic (concern, paradigm) that is under critique, such as Psychedelic Psychotherapy.

I have been disappointed by the recent books claiming to be about pro-psychedelics and entheogenic spirituality, but are padded with a bunch of boring and disappointing psychotherapy (in place of psychedelics) – my father's area.

— Michael Hoffman, the classical theorist of ego death through entheogenic Eternalism

Group: egodeath Message: 8018 From: egodeath Date: 29/06/2016
Subject: Re: Terence McKenna’s Time Wave Theory
2012 was a revolutionary change of consciousness: the Great Reveal of 2012 was that fantasy and reality are two different things.

December 2012 is the midpoint between my November 2011 {tree vs. snake} breakthrough and my November 2013 {Possibilism vs. Eternalism} super-breakthrough.

— Michael Hoffman

Group: egodeath Message: 8019 From: egodeath Date: 29/06/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast
Episode 3 1:23:00

"Scholarship as a contact sport"

Like roller derby?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykgeO6CD6RM

Group: egodeath Message: 8020 From: egodeath Date: 30/06/2016
Subject: How to fully switch to Eternalism: probe control
How to fully switch to Eternalism: probe control

How to fully switch from Possibilism to Eternalism: test and probe control, put control power on trial and judge its effective power and source and vulnerability. Not only "be aware of unity".

When *awareness* is turned specifically to *control*-source dynamics, rather than only to general *nondual unity*, the mind forcefully switches from Possibilism to Eternalism.

The most effective way to *get to Eternalism* is to *test personal control agency*.

The goal of religious mental development:
o Understand Eternalism.
o Have qualified Possibilism.
o Have a viable ongoing life.
o Withstand being experientially shown Eternalism, retaining effective control stability.
o Sacrifice dependence on Possibilism power (by mental experiments for de-monstr-ation).

Look at the veiled source of thoughts, and probe the source (wellspring) of control-thoughts and personal control power.

The Egodeath theory revolves around probing ego as control agency, not ego as awareness, because the most effective way to get to Eternalism (enlightenment; the goal of religious mental development) is to test personal control agency. Not awareness.

During loosecog, awareness separates out from being embedded in the mask layer, the mental construct layer.

Through outside-of-mind awareness, the mind sees control dynamics, and perceives the uncontrollable frozen source of control-thoughts.

First the important thing is to use awareness to probe personal control power, rather than focusing on awareness or on nondual unity experiencing.

Then the important thing — to directly reach Eternalism — is to most effectively probe control during loosecog.

How to cause and secure the switch to Eternalism?

How to effectively sacrifice the irrational dependence on Possibilism thinking?

How to definitively repudiate Possibilism thinking?

How to satisfactorally and sufficiently purify the mind of Possibilism thinking?

Mentally experiment with personal control power in loosecog, awareness of the uncontrollable preset frozen worldline of control-thoughts laid out along the worldline frozen in rock.

— Michael Hoffman

Group: egodeath Message: 8021 From: egodeath Date: 30/06/2016
Subject: Re: How to fully switch to Eternalism: probe control
The #1 mythemes (king and snake) represent control transformation, not awareness of nondual oneness unity.

Religious mythology corroborates the Egodeath theory's focus on ego as control agency, not ego as awareness or nondual oneness unity.

— Michael Hoffman

Group: egodeath Message: 8022 From: egodeath Date: 30/06/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22roller+derby%22+hatsis

Look out for Internet blogger Tom Hatsis.

Hatsis knows about the nonexistence of entheogens in Christian history and the existence of Mr. Historical Jesus, as required per Academia's false reality.

Theirs is the world of Literalist Ordinary-state Possibilism.

Allegro (Rush, Irvin, Hoffman) knows about the existence of entheogens in Christian history, and knows about the non-existence of Mr. Historical Jesus, as forbidden per Academia's false reality.

Ours is the world of Metaphorical Entheogenic Eternalism.

At stake is the allegiance of Ruck: his soul is on trial – will Hatsis pull Ruck's soul to the dark side, the academic false reality funded and enforced by the Establishment? Or will Ruck follow the lead roughly established by Allegro?

Which one existed:
o Mr. Historical Jesus
o Entheogens in Christian history

Hatsis meets the requirements of false Academia, unlike the other Internet bloggers, who refuse to be coerced by Establishment investments into shutting out reality.

Hatsis complies, loudly, with Academia's enforced commitment to suppressing ahistoricity and entheogenic Eucharist.

— Michael Hoffman

Group: egodeath Message: 8023 From: egodeath Date: 30/06/2016
Subject: Re: Book: The Psychedelic Gospels (Brown)
This author has faith in Mr. Historical Jesus, but his writing can be read per ahistoricity.

"Examines the Bible and the Gnostic Gospels to show that visionary plants were the catalyst for Jesus’s awakening to his divinity and immortality."

In fact, Jesus awakened to divinity by being given the cup.

That doesn't imply literalism, historicity, or Literalist OSC Possibilism.

The sacrificing savior king and his isomorphic followers are crucified with him willingly, helplessly fastened in frozen spacetime, fastened to the debranched tree.

— Michael

Group: egodeath Message: 8024 From: egodeath Date: 30/06/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast
It's an incomplete, incorrect account, to equate ego death with negative.

There is great deliberate pursuit and desire to know transcendent noncontrol.

Like desire, passion, rapture, leading to climax and re-experiencing the power control source relationship, marriage bed banquet, wife Ariadne riding in the passenger seat, with husband Dionysus steering their car.

Noncontrol and Eternalism with monopossibility is THE treasured sight to hunt, the vision of overpowered undermined control, personal control-thoughts subject to (at the mercy of) the source of uncontrollable control-thoughts.

— Michael Hoffman

Group: egodeath Message: 8025 From: egodeath Date: 30/06/2016
Subject: Re: How to fully switch to Eternalism: probe control
control-seizure climax

climactic control-seizure

Desire to know power vulnerability and control-dynamics.

Sacrifices/kills the old form

Gives birth to the new form

Desire to see God.

Desire to see the goddess bathing in the wellspring of control-thoughts.

— Michael Hoffman

Group: egodeath Message: 8027 From: egodeath Date: 30/06/2016
Subject: Re: How to fully switch to Eternalism: probe control
Semele *desired* to see Zeus, her husband, in their nights on the wedding couch.

Semele saw Zeus' power, and Semele's power died, and Dionysus was engendered in her.

The mortal woman, Ariadne, daughter of the king of the Labyrinth, was repudiated and abandoned by __.

Dionysus raptured, abducted, and married Ariadne, and he climaxes her in their nights on the wedding couch.

You know you are mature in Eternalism if you work miracles: raise sea-storms, calm sea-storms, cast out demons, and handle asps without being harmed, restore sight to the blind, raise the dead, make the deaf hear, make the paralytic walk, go in and out through the gate guarded by the dragon and the angel of death, into the wedding banquet garden mixed-wine party at the tree of life, where the mind climaxes nightly by the husband, the transcendent steersman.

— Michael Hoffman

Group: egodeath Message: 8028 From: egodeath Date: 30/06/2016
Subject: Re: How to fully switch to Eternalism: probe control
Control-probing in the altered state is the gateway to Eternalism.

Awareness and nondual unity oneness is *not* the gateway successfully leading to the goal of religion, which is Eternalism experiential thinking.

Awareness and nonduality experience accompany control-probing, which is the gateway to transcendent thinking.

Control-probing that leads to transformation from Possibilism to Eternalism is like looking for a pillar that elevates to the heavens, a chariot that circles upward, chasing its control tail, dancing with noncontrol and the thought-source.

When a control-agency-filled mind wrestles with the angel all night, the angel blesses that mind, that thinking, that form of control-thinking, the mind wrestles its way upward through the vertical gate, an upward chute, the control-seizure attractor climax vortex elevator, hidden chute that you look for, amidst the loose mental construct forest, hunting around to get a view of the fabled classic mythic transcendent vulnerability, the traditional way.

— Michael Hoffman

Group: egodeath Message: 8029 From: egodeath Date: 30/06/2016
Subject: Re: Transcendent Knowledge podcast
Transcendent Knowledge podcast episode 4, 1:46:00.

Metaperception in the altered state might cause nonduality experiencing, but more relevant for transformation is that metaperception in the altered state reveals noncontrol and monopossibility.

Control is revealed to be the central dynamic of enlightenment because noncontrol is more climactic and forces (efficaciously drives a large) transformation.

Focusing on control is transformative.

Control dynamics alter the mental worldmodel more than nondual awareness experience alters the mental worldmodel.

— Michael Hoffman

Group: egodeath Message: 8030 From: egodeath@yahoogroups.com Date: 01/07/2016
Subject: File – EgodeathGroupCharter.txt
The Egodeath Yahoo group is a Weblog sent out by Michael Hoffman,
covering the cybernetic theory of ego death and ego transcendence,
including:

o Block-universe determinism/Fatedness, the closed
and preexisting future, tenseless time, free will as illusory, the
holographic universe, and predestination and Reformed theology.

o Cognitive science, mental construct processing, mental models,
ontological idealism, contemporary metaphysics of the continuant
self, cybernetic self-control, personal control agency, moral agency,
and self-government.

o Zen satori, short-path enlightenment, and Alan Watts;
transpersonal psychology, Ken Wilber, and integral theory.

o Entheogens and psychedelic drugs, mystery religions, mythic
metaphor and allegorical encoding, the mystic altered state, mystic
and religious experiencing, visionary states, religious rapture, and
Acid Rock mysticism.

o Loss of control, self-control seizure, cognitive instability, and
psychosis and schizophrenia.

— Michael Hoffman
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath
http://www.egodeath.com

Author: egodeaththeory

http://egodeath.com

Leave a comment

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started