Egodeath Yahoo Group – Digest 89 (2006-01-16)


Group: egodeath Message: 4475 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 16/01/2006
Subject: Re: Strategy: Recognition of my scholarly priority of combining x,y
Group: egodeath Message: 4476 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 16/01/2006
Subject: Lyrics: Shape of Things to Come (Max Frost; Barry Mann & Cynthia We
Group: egodeath Message: 4477 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 16/01/2006
Subject: Pls write books/articles informed by this theory & referencing it
Group: egodeath Message: 4478 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 16/01/2006
Subject: Problems to prevent while theory on auto-pilot
Group: egodeath Message: 4479 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 16/01/2006
Subject: Defining the post-modern type of fame in “famous theorist”
Group: egodeath Message: 4480 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 16/01/2006
Subject: Looking for conference to present at
Group: egodeath Message: 4481 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 16/01/2006
Subject: Philosophy of perception, existence of things outside own mind
Group: egodeath Message: 4482 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 16/01/2006
Subject: Superhuman standards, ‘not writing’ as egodeath
Group: egodeath Message: 4483 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 18/01/2006
Subject: Judging imposter theories & 2nd-rate theories of egodeath/ t’t know
Group: egodeath Message: 4484 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 18/01/2006
Subject: Re: Defining the post-modern type of fame in “famous theorist”
Group: egodeath Message: 4485 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 18/01/2006
Subject: Re: Lyrics: Shape of Things to Come (Max Frost; Barry Mann & Cynthi
Group: egodeath Message: 4486 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 18/01/2006
Subject: Use the most recent lyrics version posted
Group: egodeath Message: 4487 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 18/01/2006
Subject: Re: Problems to prevent while theory on auto-pilot
Group: egodeath Message: 4488 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 19/01/2006
Subject: Obit: Blaise Staples, entheogen scholar
Group: egodeath Message: 4489 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 19/01/2006
Subject: Re: Obit: Blaise Staples, entheogen scholar
Group: egodeath Message: 4490 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 19/01/2006
Subject: Re: Problems to prevent while theory on auto-pilot
Group: egodeath Message: 4491 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 19/01/2006
Subject: Ego death not about social humility relations
Group: egodeath Message: 4492 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/01/2006
Subject: Definitions, glossary, terms, terminology, abbreviations, acronyms
Group: egodeath Message: 4493 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/01/2006
Subject: Original meaning of Christianity in its primary context, applicabil
Group: egodeath Message: 4494 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 23/01/2006
Subject: Controversy, shunning, un-citeability, mega paradigm shift, opportu
Group: egodeath Message: 4495 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 23/01/2006
Subject: Re: Controversy, shunning, un-citeability, mega paradigm shift, opp
Group: egodeath Message: 4496 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/04/2006
Subject: Article: The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
Group: egodeath Message: 4497 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/04/2006
Subject: Re: Article: The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
Group: egodeath Message: 4498 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/04/2006
Subject: Re: Article: The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
Group: egodeath Message: 4499 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/04/2006
Subject: Re: Article: The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
Group: egodeath Message: 4500 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/04/2006
Subject: Re: Article: The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
Group: egodeath Message: 4501 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/04/2006
Subject: Egodeath article
Group: egodeath Message: 4502 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/04/2006
Subject: Re: Article: The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
Group: egodeath Message: 4503 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 27/04/2006
Subject: Lyrics: Colors of My Life, by West Coast Branch
Group: egodeath Message: 4504 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 27/04/2006
Subject: Loss of sense of cross-time control
Group: egodeath Message: 4505 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 28/04/2006
Subject: Re: Article: The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
Group: egodeath Message: 4506 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 29/04/2006
Subject: Acid lyrics and concert audiences
Group: egodeath Message: 4507 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 29/04/2006
Subject: Film: A Scanner Darkly
Group: egodeath Message: 4508 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 29/04/2006
Subject: Mystic religion is solution to problem of viable, true, dual-mode c
Group: egodeath Message: 4509 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 29/04/2006
Subject: Re: Mystic religion is solution to problem of viable, true, dual-mo
Group: egodeath Message: 4510 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 29/04/2006
Subject: The transcendent personal control system
Group: egodeath Message: 4511 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 30/04/2006
Subject: Re: Article: The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
Group: egodeath Message: 4512 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/05/2006
Subject: Re: Article: The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
Group: egodeath Message: 4513 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/05/2006
Subject: Article: Wasson and Allegro on the Tree of Knowledge as Amanita
Group: egodeath Message: 4514 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/05/2006
Subject: Re: Looking for conference to present at
Group: egodeath Message: 4515 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/05/2006
Subject: Re: Egodeath article
Group: egodeath Message: 4516 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/05/2006
Subject: Re: 1-year break from Egodeath research
Group: egodeath Message: 4517 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/05/2006
Subject: Re: Looking for conference to present at
Group: egodeath Message: 4518 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/05/2006
Subject: Re: Egodeath article
Group: egodeath Message: 4519 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/05/2006
Subject: Article: The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
Group: egodeath Message: 4520 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/05/2006
Subject: Re: Article: The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
Group: egodeath Message: 4521 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/05/2006
Subject: Re: Article: The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
Group: egodeath Message: 4522 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/05/2006
Subject: Re: Article: The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
Group: egodeath Message: 4523 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/05/2006
Subject: Re: Article: The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
Group: egodeath Message: 4524 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/05/2006
Subject: Re: Egodeath article



Group: egodeath Message: 4475 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 16/01/2006
Subject: Re: Strategy: Recognition of my scholarly priority of combining x,y
>>The current scholars or theorists of areas relevant to
{dissociation, determinism, cybernetics, metaphor}.
>>…
>>cybernetics – readers of Hofstadter, computer scientists, engineers

also alcoholism researchers, abnormal psychology regarding
self-control disorders
Group: egodeath Message: 4476 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 16/01/2006
Subject: Lyrics: Shape of Things to Come (Max Frost; Barry Mann & Cynthia We
The following is one of the greatest, enlightening, truly
peak-psychedelic verses, regarding mental transformation to take into
account block-universe determinism, in particular ego death through
perceiving the unavoidability and unchangeability of one's future
thoughts. Also mentioned in the song is the inclination of running
away from this destabilizing realization (trying to look down and
trying to be stupid and blind in order to avoid seeing and hearing the
angel's attractive and destructive trumpet-blast of revelation which
threatens loss of control over one's own thoughts).

There are changes
Lyin' ahead in every road
And there are new thoughts
Ready and waiting to explode
When tomorrow is today
The bells may toll for some
But nothing can change the shape of things to come

______________________

Song: Shape of Things to Come
Performers: Max Frost and the Troopers (a group of studio musicians).
Paul Wybier, vocals.
Written by Barry Mann and Cynthia Weil
http://www.history-of-rock.com/barry_mann_and_cynthia_weil.htm
"Another of the brilliant professional songwriting teams employed at
New York's Brill Building in the during '60 … this was Don
Kirshner's most productive and gifted [songwriter] team"
#22 on the Pop chart, Aug. 1968, Studio City, CA.
Compilations: Even More Nuggets (stereo — actually dual mono),
Nuggets: Original Artyfacts from the First Psychedelic Era 1965-1968
(mono). The mastering/mixing sounds better on mono than the extreme,
torn-apart-sounding dual-mono version; best would be a proper stereo
mix.


There's a new sun
Risin' up angry in the sky
And there's a new voice
Sayin' "we're not afraid to die"

Let the old world make believe
It's blind and deaf and dumb
But nothing can change the shape of things to come

There are changes
Lyin' ahead in every road
And there are new thoughts
Ready and waiting to explode
When tomorrow is today
The bells may toll for some
But nothing can change the shape of things to come

The future's comin' in, now
Sweet and strong
Ain't no-one gonna hold it back for long

There are new dreams
Crowdin' out old realities
There's revolution
Sweepin' in like a fresh new breeze

Let the old world make believe
It's blind and deaf and dumb
(But) nothing can change the shape of things to come

_________________

The Nuggets box set liner notes prove that the Nuggets compilers have
no clue about psychedelic lyrics (as poetry interpretation) vs.
garage: "garage-punk riff and lyrics harping on themes of revolution
and youth rebellion … punk snarl and Hollywood kitsch…" This
off-base, hardly relevant commentary also shows how video content (the
movie Wild in the Streets) typically ruins and destroys a clear
reading of the lyrics in themselves. The supposed track review reads
like a movie-scene review instead. That analysis is like reading
Revelation as only a mundane political commentary rather than as
personal subjective mystical/visionary themed.


Book:
H.G. Wells
The Shape of Things to Come
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/075510420X/
1933


Different psych song with similar name:
Song: Shapes of Things
Artist: The Yardbirds
McCarty/Keith Relf/ Samwell-Smith
Covered by Rush in the Feedback cover-album, 2004. This song cover
sounds like their Caress of Steel and 2112 albums, in terms of
production, playing style, and equipment tone. David Bowie covered
this on the Pinups album, 1972


—–Original Message—–
From: egodeath@yahoogroups.com [mailto:egodeath@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Michael Hoffman
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2005 7:16 PM
To: 'Egodeath Group'
Subject: [egodeath] Lyric: shapes of things

———————— Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
——————–~–> Life without art & music? Keep the arts alive
today at Network for Good!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/FXrMlA/dnQLAA/Zx0JAA/qCsqlB/TM
——————————————————————–~-
>

Great inspired verse:

There are changes
Lyin' ahead in every road
And there are new thoughts
Ready and waiting to explode
When tomorrow is today
The bells may toll for some
But nothing can change the shape of things to come
Group: egodeath Message: 4477 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 16/01/2006
Subject: Pls write books/articles informed by this theory & referencing it
I don't desire a monopoly on publishing about Ego Death — I merely
want to be credited truly as the first modern systematic theorist to
propose in detail that religion is based on dissociation, determinism,
cybernetics, and metaphor.

In one, high-level sense, I want to be the last word on the Ego Death
theory; but in another sense, I'm looking forward to seeing what other
angles and variants of the Ego Death theory people come up with —
particularly regarding what exactly is the cognitive phenomenology
involved in self-control seizure and the cognitive mechanisms of
recovery of personal control stability. I doubt I'm much interested
in any attempted Ego Death theory that doesn't involve the idea of
dissociation or the unchangeability of future thoughts; a theory that
doesn't cover dissociation or the uncontrollability of future thoughts
could hardly count as an Ego Death theory. But within the broadest
definition of "dissociation, determinism, cybernetics, and metaphor",
it is interesting to see what variant combinations are possible in a
theory of Ego Death. For example, does such a theory, in its
technical core, *have* to cover or affirm the idea of transcending
determinism? That depends largely on defining 'transcend', but in
either case, I deliberately marry and commit to the idea of
'determinism' rather than 'determinism transcendence' and specify a
particular sense of 'determinism'.

What is the range of views on 'dissociation' such that a theory
putting forth such views would count as "a variant of the Ego Death
theory"?

What is the range of views on 'determinism' such that a theory putting
forth such views would count as "a variant of the Ego Death theory"?

What is the range of views on 'cybernetics' such that a theory putting
forth such views would count as "a variant of the Ego Death theory"?

What is the range of views on 'metaphor' such that a theory putting
forth such views would count as "a variant of the Ego Death theory"?


A usefully high-level and broad definition of the Ego Death theory
defining the range of what I'd recognize as "a variant of the Ego
Death theory", the minimum characteristics required to have a "family
resemblance" is defined in my posting "Strategy: Recognition of my
scholarly priority of combining x,y,z":

"Religion is primarily and originally concerned with the
entheogen-induced intense dissociative cognitive state; the
pre-setness, unchangeability, inevitability, and unavoidability of
one's own future thoughts; the problematic limitations of autonomous
self-control cybernetics in personal agency; and metaphors describing
these experiences and experiential insights."

If someone claimed to have a version of the Ego Death theory that
lacked coverage of the entheogen-induced intense dissociative
cognitive state; or lacked the idea of the pre-setness,
unchangeability, inevitability, and unavoidability of one's own future
thoughts; or neglected the topic of the problematic limitations of
autonomous self-control cybernetics in personal agency; or didn't
robustly connect to metaphors describing these experiences and
experiential insights, I could hardly take seriously the claim that
the result is a version of the Ego Death theory.

I would be interested in what version of each component someone else's
proposed variant theory of Ego Death has: what does that variant
theory say about 'dissociation', particularly the entheogen-induced
intense dissociative cognitive state; about 'determinism',
particularly the pre-setness, unchangeability, inevitability, and
unavoidability of one's own future thoughts; about 'cybernetics',
particularly the problematic limitations of autonomous self-control in
personal agency; and about metaphors describing these experiences and
experiential insights?

You do not have to think of each main ideas in exactly the
configuration I've defined; you do not have to think in terms of
"experiencing a fearful threatening self-control seizure", though
there should be an idea that is functionally comparable.


My writings and expression of the Ego Death theory have to be read
skillfully, not stupidly in a brittle fashion. If I mangle a
sentence, people have to be able to recognize this based on my other
writings, taking my whole theory into perspective — you have to be
able to predict what I would write were I to clarify what my position
is; you have to be able to act as a delegate who could represent my
view to other people in a way I'd agree with.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: egodeath Message: 4478 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 16/01/2006
Subject: Problems to prevent while theory on auto-pilot
I don't want people to have to guess at my position on various
matters, so I write some guidance postings such as the following.
This way, I make it easy for any serious researchers who should ever
want to study and develop the Ego Death theory. They need to know the
possible problems and ways to head them off — challenges and
strategies.

I'm covering these points here now to stop manually maintaining the
Ego Death theory and have it be self-sustaining. There are problems
to account for when setting up a system to be self-sustaining. The
main problems to prevent when I leave the ego death theory to be
self-sustaining are:

o Intellectual property theft (of credit and attribution)

o People confusing each other by their misunderstanding, misreading,
or lack of really reading the theory definition, resulting in
propagating a noxious false imitation of the theory

o Unnecessarily limiting people's range of ideas that could
contribute toward the Ego Death theory. People should not think that
just because my theory is true in essence and is the final word as far
as the high-level outline, that every detail I've put forth is the
final word and my exact phrasing has to be parroted.

My favorite and the most encouraging postings other people have
contributed are those by people who accurately grasped the Ego Death
theory and contributed toward filling-in novel content into the
theoretical paradigm, essentially pointing out additional, newly
identified ramifications and implications of the Ego Death principles.
*That* is what the world needs more of — far more than way off-base
distorted posts that "add value" purely in the negative sense of
identifying where I need to direct my time and labor to undoing and
preventing that distorted misconception of the theory in the future.
The latter has a good outcome only if I spend my time and labor; all
value is added by me, which has drawbacks / limitations making it only
occasionally an efficient approach.

These problems for making the theory self-sustaining have to be
accounted for and reasonably prevented prior to walking away from the
self-sustaining system (the online Ego Death theory). Otherwise, were
one of these problems to occur while my theory is on autopilot while
I'm away, by the time I finally return, it might be too late to easily
correct the problem. I won't be around immediately to address
problems that would be able to develop.


My writings and expression of the Ego Death theory have to be read
skillfully, not stupidly in a brittle fashion or with hostile,
destructive misrepresentation. If I mangle a sentence, people have to
be able to recognize this based on my other writings, taking my whole
theory into perspective — you have to be able to predict what I would
write were I to clarify what my position is; you have to be able to
act as a delegate who could represent my view to other people in a way
I'd agree with. No one can possibly be a truly good debater with me
if they are incapable of accurately explaining my view to other people
in a way I'd agree with.

It is a malfunction and a setback for everyone when people
misrepresent my position/theory, whether out of malice or out of
carelessness — that's one reason why strategically, the first goal
must be to clearly define the theory, rather than to somehow convince
the ever-doubters. There are no doubters of the theory, so much as
misunderstanders of what the theory does and does not assert. Most
commonly, someone writes what they take to be a refutation of the Ego
Death theory, when really, their posting just proves that they don't
understand what the theory is — what it asserts and does not assert.


The responses I write are valuable, and the exchange is valuable, but
for twisted, indirect reasons. Their misfired, off-base statements
(which fail to connect with my actual views so couldn't possibly
refute or affirm my views) are valuable not intrinsically (they are
dangerously misleading to other people, stirring up confusion) but are
valuable in that they indicate common misunderstandings of the theory
which I must clarify. Thus there are serious pros and cons of
permitting people to write about the theory in my official discussion
areas.


The pattern is, someone submits a short, clumsy, inarticulate,
dangerously misleading posting that threatens to get everyone highly
confused and entrench a distorted, faux simulated imposter in place of
my theory. The theory says A, B, C, but an inarticulate person
suddenly comes in and says "Your theory that A', B', and C', is
obviously junk." Now everyone (especially newcomers) starts thinking
that the theory says A', B', and C'.

Worse is, they say "Your theory that A', B', and C', is obviously
junk. The truth is, A, B, C." Ken Wilber had to subject one such
writer to a public scourging, exposing the attempted theft of Wilber's
intellectual property, in the article "Do Critics Misrepresent My
Position?"

Then I have to take the time to clarify, partly with repeated points I
already clarified previously, but partly with new, clearer expression,
what the theory actually does assert. After I've posted that
clarification and improved expression, I'm glad it's there.


So there is a substantial problem with others' postings which so often
deceive other newcomers by misportraying the theory — it's a real
problem, a serious harm that is intrinsically harmful and not helpful,
if left unanswered. Also unacceptably harmful is others' writings
that attempt to misportray the theory and then steal credit for the
actual theory. But the improved clarifications I post in response to
such misguided, confused postings are highly valuable. There are pros
and cons with my condoning such postings: they tend to prevent
understanding, they place an urgent time and labor obligation onto me,
and yet the result is an improved clarification.

Ultimately, it's an issue of time management efficiency. The worst,
most ill-informed, unintelligent, hackneyed, inarticulate posts people
submit often lead me to write the most valuable advances in clarifying
and developing what the Ego Death theory asserts. Thus I would accept
such postings, except for the hard fact that I don't have the time to
put such a priority on writing-up clarifying responses, and also, such
an approach is out of order (sequence, protocol): it forces me to stop
whatever angle I'm currently working on, and turn my full attention
immediately to clarifying some random person's random confusion of the
moment.

It's unmanageable, in some sense, trying to develop a theory under
that harsh condition — but on the other hand, the rough-and-tumble of
taking on all comers who throw random irrelevant monkeywrench postings
at the Ego Death theory has resulted in a hard-headed, real-world
based, *robust* theory. Unfortunately, that approach forces me to be
the lone contributor of all the value, unlike the ideal situation
where well-informed scholars already understand accurately what the
theory asserts, and they critique the actual theory rather than some
distorted, lame substitute for the theory that leads away from
engaging with the actual theory.


Misconceived criticism is only good and helpful if it is followed by a
clarifying response. If left to stand uncorrected by itself,
misdirected criticism can only be harmful, a harmful parasitical
pseudo-criticism. If someone understands what the Ego Death theory
asserts, and they write a critique that accurately represents the Ego
Death theory, that would be a positive contribution of value. The
problem is not with genuine and actual critique of the theory, but
rather, pseudo-critique based on misunderstanding the theory or
maliciously and opportunistically misportraying the theory.

Rough-and-tumble, in-the-trenches, unmoderated exchanges that are
(more or less) about the theory, have their place, have their value,
but have limitations as well, and cannot be the only approach I use my
time for. One approach that could fit these limitations is that I
periodically open up the discussion group — perhaps with full
moderation/editing — for short, limited periods, where I'm willing to
full-time commit to crafting clarifying responses of whatever postings
are permitted through. I've seen special-purpose Yahoo "seminar"
discussion groups created for such short-term use, fully moderated,
for leading scholars to temporarily discuss selected points with other
scholars.

Richard Horsley http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HorsleySeminar/ (New
Testament as counter-narrative to Roman Ruler Cult and Pax Romana)
April 20, 2002 – May 11, 2002

Dale Allison http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Allison-Seminar (Jesus as
apocalyptic prophet) March 23, 2003 – April 5, 2003

It would be possible to select some moderators to fully moderate the
Ego Death discussion group. I have written-off and given up on
unmoderated or sporadically moderated discussion groups, because they
never pay attention to the stated mission and scope of discussion.
For ego death, most postings failed to connect to the Ego Death
theory, presented incomprehensible writing, or grossly misrepresented
the theory.

Few postings explicitly connected with the theory and were written
comprehensibly and represented the theory reasonably well. I merely
wanted people to contribute comprehensible postings that explicitly
connected to the ego death theory and avoided grossly misrepresenting
it, but for the most part, it turned out that was too much to ask —
people weren't up to those demands. Ultimately, people looked to me
to meet those demands, since it is my theory and not many people have
the writing ability and the knowledge to truly contribute to the
discussion about the theory.

There were valuable aspects of the valuable postings people
contributed, if only one could avoid the obstruction presented by the
misleading, aggravating, off-base postings. Like the Nuggets box sets
of rock compilations: when only the most psychedelically interesting
25% of the songs are culled together and played, the box sets are
worthwhile, but I couldn't stand listening to the other 75% of the
songs, which are obstructions. Most postings in most discussion
groups are obstructions, the opposite of contributing value.

Fully moderated groups seem like they'd offer the greatest value and
reward for serious, invested contributors. 'Fully moderated' means
some approach that could prevent any flame phrases or other types of
personal socializing verbiage from ever appearing. Every sentence and
phrase must adhere to the in-scope discussion topics.

The resulting text you see would have to be comparable to the ongoing
exchanges found in the Letters section of journals or magazines, where
the editor has most certainly quality-controlled and vetted the
content and phrasing. Ideally, the moderators would do a rewrite and
standardization pass on all text of all postings that are submitted —
as I've done with other's postings in this weblog and as Earl Doherty
seems to have done. Partial control and filtering isn't enough; full
control and filtering is required for a magazine and for a serious,
moderated online discussion. Full moderation is fair and functional.
A moderated discussion group, or a weblog temporarily open for group
discussion, could be for a finite period.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: egodeath Message: 4479 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 16/01/2006
Subject: Defining the post-modern type of fame in “famous theorist”
In scholarship, the famous innovator and discoverer is never famous in
the world he worked in. By the time he's famous, his contribution has
changed the world. So his fame exists in a changed world. In the
case of Ego Death theory, which covers the nature of the self and a
transformed worldmodel around the self, the very nature of fame would
change from the typical modern version to more like an ancient
equivalent in the generic pseudonymous "heroic wise man" who
disappears as a separate, distinctive entity, disappears into a
generic archetype, generically divinized in apotheosis; you are
elevated to apotheosis, but you risk disappearing as a modern-type
individual.

Perhaps in the post-modern era, a theorist of ego-transcendence could
remain as a real, tangible individual and yet also do away with the
modern ideas about individual fame. This is related to the paradox
about the monk who won the monastic championship: he became
world-famous for his record-breaking humility and extreme
disappearance of ego-existence. That paradox might be solved via
determinism, no-free-will; the monk can be perfectly humble in the
specific sense of fully repudiating the free-will assumption. But
then so could lots of monks, again collapsing the distinctive
uniqueness of such achievement; you end up again with innumerable
hoards of generic, non-individual bodhisattvas.

It isn't a coherent goal for an ego death theorist to wish to become
world-famous as the most famous egoic superstar of ego-cancellation;
neither is it a coherent suitable post-modern goal to which to vanish
into faceless generic hoards of pseudonymous pre-modern type
"perennial wise men". In the post-modern era, what kind of famousness
would it make sense for a famous breakthrough theorist to have? This
issue is not limited to being an idle joke or practice exercise toward
fleshing-out or exercising the ego death theory; it's fun yet also an
issue that really is produced by the logic of ego death discovery
during this actual late-modern era.

Were a consistent late-modern theorist of ego death to dream of
"fame", what sort of "fame" would this consistently have to be, in
light of predetermined nature of all events? Such consistent type of
fame would hearken to elements of schizophrenics' claims, the claims
of mad Jesus, of mad emperors, of madmen claiming omnipotence — at
the same time as claiming to be helplessly controlled by hidden
agents. According to Wilberian post-ego, post-modern theory, such
fame would preserve modern-type individuality, while also transcending
it.

Such fame would neither be an individuality-destroying collapse of the
separate-self, nor an egoistic modern-type megalomaniac substitute
Atman project as people sometimes accuse guru-worship as leading
toward. Such fame would hearken to intensely individual characters
like the pseudo-historical Jesus. Perhaps a post-modernly famous
breakthrough theorist of ego transcendence would be a famous egoically
vanished hero yet an intensely present individual personality like
Mohammed (if we daringly suppose that Mohammed was in some significant
sense a real historical individual).


In the mid-1990s I often thought of being a famous personality,
knowable as a distinctive biographical person. By 2000 I had
completely abandoned that manner of thinking as frivolous pop-star
worship colored by the "Wired" culture of the late 1980s to late
1990s. I think Erik Davis is famous in that dated, overstylized
manner. I ceased thinking in such "famous personality" terms when I
desired to focus on contributing something not dated, but timelessly
lasting.

Yet Ken Wilber's theory implies that there is actually much in favor
of being a famous personality and distinctive individual with a unique
biographical character — while we transcend the modern ego with every
man a superstar with a separate skin-encapsulated ego, we cannot claim
to truly *transcend* the egoic character unless we *appreciate* and
*affirm* the separate person — the separate personality is a
wonderful, priceless contribution of the modern, entirely OSC-based
era, a weird and historically exception era in which "normal, fully
grown adults" were noninitiates, in which people were considered
"normal mature adults" even though few such persons were initiated
into a series of dissociative state sessions integrated into religion.


It is easy to despise as a monstrosity how the modern self was
considered normal maturity, without initiation. But the result has
been such a strong egoic delusion, that a novelty in history was
produced by the modern-era failure to have real initiatory
transformation: we accidentally invented the modern egoic self, the
individual character. We should retain this oddity, this titan of
delusion, even while setting things straight through initiation which
"sacrificially abducts one's child-self" like Persephone.

We should keep ahold of the character and individual, Mr. Historical
Jesus, which we have accidentally constructed as the modern-era model
and template for each person to become, for the first time in history,
a "real ego", the adult individual egoic self. As an end-of-modernity
theorist of ego death and ego transcendence, I should want to become
famous as though a Jesus that existed. Famous like a historical
Jesus, like Demeter, famous like a Triptolemus that existed as a
historical individual. All is stationary, preexistent, predecided,
frozen into timeless spacetime, including the colossal delusion of the
modern era with all its feral, barbarian, noninitiated egoic selves
running all over and claiming sovereign autonomy, claiming to be
creating and controlling their own future destiny.

How can we design a kind of famousness that cherishes and preserves
that poor deluded Persephone, that sweet pathetic delusion of the
modern individual famous self, while yet somehow transcending it? How
can we be more individual characters than the Greeks were, and yet
also be even more enlightened (systematically educated) about the
illusory nature of the separate egoic persona, than the Greeks? We
have to create a kind of fame that's supremely modern (the "developed
adult noninitiate"), yet completely transcends taking seriously that
shadowy illusion of being a separate self wielding control-power over
one's future while voyaging through time and moving oneself through
space.

Instead of mourning for the soul of Persephone, who became during
initiation a shade abducted by the god, a different, more ascended
view seems to be demanded by Wilber's principle of "affirming and
functionally preserving the ego-illusion as a tool, and transcending
it, possessing it but not mentally identifying with it or reifying
that mental construct in a naive sense". For one thing, it's
incorrect to entirely and simply say that the ego is an illusion. The
ego is a program, a functionality, a configuration, an arrangement of
mental constructs; in some senses, the ego is not just an illusion.

By defining our concepts more clearly and precisely than the Greeks,
we can more richly preserve the Persephone in each of us; I can say "I
am me, I am an individual, I move myself and control my future" while
also saying "my self is not entirely what it naively seems to be in
the ordinary cognitive state, and in some specific respects, is only a
useful illusion of convention."

That is how we in the post-modern era will beat the Greeks: one of the
greatest potential gifts provided by the modern era is a far greater
precision of explicit explanatory systems; as a modern-type systematic
theorist, I have applied the gifts of modernity I've been given by
those around me, to *leap far ahead* of the moderns and the ancients,
in that I've provided an incomparably more organized, systematic, and
explicit model and explanation of transcendent knowledge. What kind
of fame is implied for the late-modern-into-post-modern, breakthrough
theorist of ego death and transcendent knowledge? To be somehow more
egoic than any modern-type egoic agent ever has managed to be, and to
be more ego-transcendent than any pre-modern generic "wise man to whom
all knowledge has been revealed" has ever been.

I am famous as leaping up to be by far more egoic than any person in
the modern era, and also more ego-transcendent than any person in the
pre-modern period ever was. How would the pseudo-historical figure of
Jesus or Buddha fail to meet that definition of "post-modern-type
fame"? Jesus and Buddha, or those who constructed those
pseudo-historical figures, didn't provide an explicit, ergonomic,
modern-type systematic system. *I* did. *I* was made to and
predestined to do so.

Schizophrenics or those hyper-religious people whose lot is
temporal-lobe epilepsy, didn't do so, or if they did, the write-up is
buried in their "countless shopping bags stuffed full of profound
writings". Have cult-gurus provided an ergonomic systematization of
ego death and transcendent knowledge. My criteria for "an ergonomic
systematization of ego death and transcendent knowledge" is, read my
10,000 word summary article and reflect on it for several forthrightly
available dissociation sessions (as ready-to-hand as 'mixed wine' was
in Hellenistic-Roman culture). I believe that no one else in history
has managed to formulate and publish anywhere near as ergonomic and
explicit and systematic a theory as the Ego Death theory.

I'm a lone creator but also I'm a puppet-like vehicle, frozen into
place in spacetime, through which the modern era and post-modern
information age has focused and channeled its full resources. I'm the
most famous slave-like, program-like, powerless puppet-king, extremely
modern egoic-shaped, and extremely transcendent; perfectly an
individual character with a unique distinctive biography (of a modern
fame sort) and yet also associated with extremely surpassing
systematization of ego death, ego transcendence, and transcendent
knowledge. That's more or less what "fame" or a "famous theorist"
would amount to, moving into the post-modern era: a king puppet
program with a clear instruction manual jumping around exclaiming
superior fame than all modern people (who are puppet-people as well).

Cicero considered himself a powerful powerless puppet dancing on the
strings of the gods; each of us now, with my theory in hand and Jesus'
"likeness of sinful flesh" in the other hand, have every reason and
tool enabling us to be more egoically strong of an individual
personality than any ancient Cicero or modern pop star, and yet also
more systematically puppet-like and systematically ultra-transcendent
than any 'mixed-wine'-using ancient.

In other fields, it would be of only peripheral relevance to consider
what kind of fame the field fits with. However, in the special case
of the field of ego death, ego transcendence, and transcendent
knowledge, in the late modern era, the question is interesting,
relevant, and valuable, of what kind of scholarly fame makes sense for
a breakthrough researcher of ego death.

Those who have no understanding of ego death consider the subject
taboo. Taking the inverted view, the topic is inherently significant
and relevant. Imagine in a puppet-world, perhaps online, that an
egoic agent fully discovered and developed a completely successful
explicit systematic explanation of ego death and transcendent
knowledge, while no other puppet had ever done so (to anywhere near
such an extent) in a previous section of the spacetime block.

This situation could only arise after a long ancient history and then
a long drought, a long shortage of any insight — after a modern
period. Such a puppet would have to be in a unique cultural
situation. The ancient era had religious experiential insight, but
not modern ergonomic explicit written systematization such as Newton
introduced. The late modern era eventually developed techniques for
modern ergonomic explicit written systematization, but lacked
on-demand religious experiential insight (it wasn't integrated into
the official culture).

Only such a 2-phase previous history could permit the situation to
arise of a theorist-puppet arriving to apply all cultural resources to
set things straight, combining the fruits of antiquity and modernity
to become the first to leap beyond both (or, in puppet-speak, "to be
made and helplessly forced to leap beyond both").


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: egodeath Message: 4480 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 16/01/2006
Subject: Looking for conference to present at
I am looking for a conference at which to present my article,
including disussion of many illustrations, more than in the print
published version.

http://www.egodeath.com/EntheogenTheoryOfReligion.htm — will have 8
or more art illustrations and additional subheadings, and some minor
wording improvements.

http://www.egodeath.com/contact.htm


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: egodeath Message: 4481 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 16/01/2006
Subject: Philosophy of perception, existence of things outside own mind
The question isn't so much "Does the external world, and other people,
and myself-not-now, exist?" Rather, the question is, "These exist in
some sense — in what senses or ways might the external world, other
people, and myself-not-now exist?" I wouldn't say that "Other people
are known to me via my own mind's mental constructs, so those other
people don't exist."

It's more powerful and useful to consider the situation as: I know
that other people exist, and the represented world and myself-not-now,
but due to the inherent nature of perception, I can't be sure of the
sense or way in which they exist.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: egodeath Message: 4482 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 16/01/2006
Subject: Superhuman standards, ‘not writing’ as egodeath
While I'm attempting a hiatus, there's a problem and conundrum. What
to do when I have significant insights, as the paradigm of Ego Death
theory plays out in my mind as I happen across mystic pictures or
thoughts. Do I prepare them in a manuscript? I love how weblogs
enable effortless instant logging and communicating of the
breakthrough insight of the moment. It's like an addiction or
habituation.


There are several reasons why it feels like I need to instantly post
the day's insights:

I want to press the point that the Ego Death theory has many
ramifications and explains countless mysteries of religious and mythic
images, such as "trampling on the cross" or "snake on an obelisk".
The Ego Death theory's solutions to problems just keep coming without
stop; this theory "reveals all knowledge and wisdom".

It could be considered scholarly greed, or an understandable
"completist" compulsion like those who have to have absolutely every
version of every record by a Rock group, just for the sake of having
it. I find that I'm always unconsciously carrying around many
questions, many religious figurations and expressions that don't have
a significant meaning for me, and then connections fall together per
the latest Theory developments and sparks fly as the connections come
together into comprehension.

I cannot imagine waiting for years and then prepping a manuscript for
slow, snail-like publication; I was born in the online era, though I
love having printed books as well. Weblogging, and the Web, has many
fantastic advantages enabling such a fast rate of connections coming
together, print publishing has seemed like a joke for me, even in
periodicals — uselessly slow and fossilized, a stationary, frozen
medium in a hyperspeed era.

I feel heavily obliged to grant people credit, such as the excellent
lyrics in Shape of Things to Come. I feel that I can't not post; it's
a crime to have only posted those lyrics with a previously malformed
subject line and no artist/composer information. Everyone
misunderstands me (my lyrics theory) too much if they don't know that
I have come to consider those some of the most perfect acid-mysticism
lyrics; not clarifying that point felt like a huge limitation on all
my lyrics research.

It would've been a big, fatal-for-the-theory misunderstanding if my
concern for securing recognition scared writers off from writing
about, and fleshing-out, the Ego Death theory, waiting for
who-knows-how-long for me to lead the publishing activity on the
subject.

People send me questions or critiques I don't want to ignore now, and
no way am I going to reply to them alone, without sharing the reply by
posting it.


In my world, everything has grotesquely magnified importance; I feel
all-powerful, all-capable, all-important, inundated by profundity of
connections, thus burdened with responsibility, a sickness of noblesse
oblige, all the burdens and disadvantages of a messiah complex, like
knowing how to create the atom bomb while World War II is being lost,
like a destiny whipping me on despite all need for balance; my life is
crippled by excessive scholarly opportunity — I've felt pretty much
this way since the beginning in 1985, to the point of excessive
pressure making the whole prospect feel doomed and not worthwhile.

Capability and mania can drive one excessively, into imbalance, in
effect handicapping a person from normal human interactions and
activities — it's quite common, for example covered by Kay Jamison's
books about manic depression, such as Touched by Fire. Am I am human
in society, or some thing, some cybernetic player out of a William
Gibson dystopian novel? How can I justify wasting time with normal
human interactions, when I have to save the world, affirming Newton by
producing the religious equivalent of his Principia? It's my duty to
compare myself to the greatest thinkers and intellectual contributors
ever.

I would pick Einstein as my role model and standard for what I expect
for myself, for what I'm obliged to produce, but he's not good enough.
Einstein did a poor job of defining 'simultaneous' — people got
confused over what his particular point was, thinking he threw away
all time axes because "everything is merely relative, not
determinate", despite that the real name of his theory is The Theory
of *Invariance*. 'Invariant' may refer officially to measured light
speed, but also, two events in spacetime are relative *but invariant*
in their relative relationship; we must remember that Einstein adhered
to the block universe model and hidden variables, not a mush of
relative indeterminacy. (That's one reason I've spent decades trying
to figure out the best name for the Ego Death theory.)

Einstein was also linguistically inept at refuting Bohr's
Copenhagenist interpretation. Einstein failed to find the Ego Death
theory even though it proceeds straight from the spacetime cubes he
drew. So there's no justification for my using Einstein as an example
of scholarly effectiveness.

Newton's alchemical esotericism didn't get nearly as far as my Ego
Death theorizing, so there's no justification for my using Newton as
an example of scholarly effectiveness. Mozart, Newton, Hawking — I
really need to be picking role models who are smarter and more
productive, from a ranking more suited to my higher abilities, but
alas my slave-drivingly high standards I punish myself with have run
out of real humans to compare my achievements to.


There are disadvantages to being successful at something, or being
outstandingly effective at something — it tends to shut out giving
yourself permission to do anything other than that one activity, until
you aren't even human, among humans anymore, but instead become a
freak, a sideshow wonder, unique, a lone superstar, a Howard Hughes
nutcase, and life is an extremely unbalanced wreck.

Write a book? No way, that means I'd have to slow the pace a bit in
developing the leading edge of theory. I am incapable of writing a
book, because there can't possibly be any justification for slowing
down the pace on the very leading edge of research. The space shuttle
isn't far enough out, the space station isn't far enough out, the moon
isn't far enough out, Jupiter isn't far enough out, I've got to go out
in a spacepod to the door outside of Jupiter, and beyond that too.
Here I am flying through the hyperdimensional spacetime tunnel, and
you expect me to stop and write a book?! You're *crazy*!

Einstein wasted his time writing a book, and he permanently fell
behind. Everyone who has ever written a book has failed to write the
Ego Death theory, so there exists no example of where writing a book
proves I should stop and write one. The world *tried* the approach of
slowing down to write a book, and what was the result? None of them
wrote the only book that matters, presenting the Ego Death theory,
thus failing to prove that I too should do like them, come to a halt,
and carve my theory into papery stone.

Ken Wilber wrote books — that failed to find the Ego Death theory.
Watts, much the same. Newton stopped to publish, but he's the worst
as far as contention over scholarly priority, against Leibniz, and
Descartes raced and challenged them for priority as well. They were
in an almost violent race to the death, so to speak, not exactly your
picture of the balanced life. Many who write books describe it as
really hellish, crazy, and unpleasant, a bad trip they're loathe to
repeat. I can just barely survive writing an article, sustaining
major damage to my life balance.


Along with the usual boringly routine sorts of breakthrough insights
of the day, after starting a hiatus for awhile, some concerns became
clear to me. Some things needed to be communicated to make the Ego
Death theory self-sustaining in some appropriate sense, while my
creation is on autopilot (from my point of view) during the year-long
hiatus.

I feel too burdened, it can drive a person to an imbalanced life,
feeling that the future of world religion depends on what people do
with my theory while I'm away for a year. It's up to me to save the
world religiously, to address Islam, religious wars, Buddhism,
Gnostic/orthodox mutual misrepresentation, the interesting possible
nonexistence of the centuries we call 700-1100, dozens of clear
mushrooms in the gothic windows of Chartres, setting up the theory in
case it succeeds and people need to figure out how to handle certain
aspects of it, and have I even really addressed and characterized
explicitly the main thing, which is the mechanics of self-control
instability and restabilization, or have I accidentally omitted the
all-central experience of the "sacrifice of Isaac" from my religion's
bible?

With grand ambitions, with grand resources we have these days, with
the grand delusion we've had for centuries and so the extreme ripeness
of the world for religious breakthrough, there also comes grand
pressure and overambition, the compulsion of theory-completism — like
a parent who can't let go of the boarding student. There is so much
that needs to be said, so many connections, so many books to enjoy
reading, it's nuts, especially without a crew of servants and
assistant researchers.

At this point, it would be most helpful for people to accurately
understand the Ego Death theory and carry it forward. Perfect would
be a ghost writer with little input from me, creating a book outline,
then a book. The hardest transcendent action for me is to let go of
being a theorist for a year at this point, but life is multifaceted
and that's what I'm doing.


In these postings, I've provided researchers with the cautions and
guidance they need to properly carry on with the Ego Death theory, and
demonstrated how the theory, once it gets rolling, almost
automatically continues to churn out solutions to many religious
mysteries of meaning.
Group: egodeath Message: 4483 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 18/01/2006
Subject: Judging imposter theories & 2nd-rate theories of egodeath/ t’t know
Judging imposter theories and 2nd-rate theories of egodeath or
transcendent knowledge


I don't want people to be stuck with yet more of the same old
missing-the-mark, off-base models of religious experiencing that talk
big talk and utterly fail to deliver the goods. Such theories are a
tease keeping people as mystic eunuchs, able to look and think of
mystical climax but not able to actually undergo mystical climax.
Here I demonstrate some critiques of imposter theories, 2nd-rate
theories that purport to provide an explanatory model of ego death,
religious experiencing, spiritual awakening, or transcendent
knowledge, but fail to provide anywhere near the potential such a
model can have and can actively exhibit.

A true model of ego death is characterized by immediately making
sense, and immediately providing the most intense experiential insight
that can be had. Imposter models of ego death fail to provide intense
experiencing and a determinate, specifiable mental transformation.
They provide weak experience, weak insight, and little real mental
worldmodel transformation.


After Oct. 6, 1966, one version of Buddhism has been invented, as one
example of an imposter model of mystic experiencing. It's a
combination of abstract doctrine and hazy waffling about the mystic
dissociative altered state that, when pressed hard enough for
specifics, reveals its true colors by denying the relevance of the
mystic altered state toward the goal of enlightenment, awakening,
religious maturation, and the religious life. Not only denying the
relevance, but at the extreme, asserting that the altered state
prevents, impedes, and blocks enlightenment. That radical
anti-mystic-state position is the old classic case of the priests vs.
the entheogen in a conflict of interest.


A theory is likely to fail in regard to:

1. Dissociation, entheogens.

The maximally wimped-out, imposter version of the Ego Death theory
rejects or takes little or no interest in the subject of dissociation,
the dissociative mystic altered state. My objection why this makes
for an ersatz, watered-down, neutered, imposter theory of ego death:
the dissociative state is clearly closely associated with religious
experiencing.

The maximally wimped-out, imposter version of the Ego Death theory
rejects most of the entheogen theory of religion; it adheres to the
entheogen-diminishing or super-moderate version of the entheogen
theory of religion. Such a theory would have barely any interest in
or coverage of entheogens. My objection why this makes for an ersatz,
watered-down, neutered, imposter theory of ego death: other techniques
lack evidence of forthright, repeatable efficacy, and cultures where
the general populace used visionary plants demonstrate the potential
to have so-called "communal ritual" and so-called "personal primary
mystical experience" at the same time.

There are other major objections as well, per the authentic Ego Death
theory. That's true for the following items as well. Defining more
of these objections is left for the reader.


2. Determinism.

The maximally wimped-out, imposter version of the Ego Death theory
rejects most interest in determinism, or just plain ignores it, or
limits discussion to determinism without covering the subject of
transcendence of determinism. My objection why this makes for an
ersatz, watered-down, neutered, imposter theory of ego death:
historically, the subjects of determinism and transcending determinism
were driving themes propelling Western religion, and in some form,
Eastern.


3. Self-control cybernetics.

The maximally wimped-out, imposter version of the Ego Death theory
doesn't present, or even rejects, the problematic nature of autonomous
self-control cybernetics. My objection why this makes for an ersatz,
watered-down, neutered, imposter theory of ego death: personal will,
the bewitched and coerced will, and personal power are central themes
in religious writings. One's will is one's innermost self or
possession, and one's innermost self is the heart of religion.


4. Metaphor, historicity of mythic figures, OSC-based literalism of
myth-religion reading technique, failure of recognition of
dissociative-state descriptions.

The maximally wimped-out, imposter version of the Ego Death theory
maintains the historicity of Jesus and the apostles including Paul.
My objection why this makes for an ersatz, watered-down, neutered,
imposter theory of ego death: to read these figures as historical is
necessarily to lose the ability to read them as mystical, allegorical,
and political in intent as strategically invented figures. It is
futile to try to blend a mature, sophisticated mystic reading of these
figures, knowing the total context of their historical origin, with
the axiom that they were also, in addition, influential historical
individuals that can be singled out as individuals.


5. Mental worldmodel transformation (cognitive psychology, mental
construct processing).

The maximally wimped-out, imposter version of the Ego Death theory
doesn't present, or even rejects, a determinate, directly, explicitly,
and specifically specifiable mental worldmodel transformation. My
objection why this makes for an ersatz, watered-down, neutered,
imposter theory of ego death: a purported transformation that isn't
specifiable is worthless haze, nonrepeatable, and always associated
with authoritarian ("you have to fully trust in my inarticulatable
wisdom") long-term money-motivated or generally support-motivated
scams. These usually involve a leader on whom individuals are
supposed to be exclusively dependent. The evasive and inarticulate
proponent can't forthrightly define the result of such a system,
because there is no result, or no result that is significant enough to
compete in the marketplace of options.


The more of these subjects a theory wimps out on, the wimpier the
theory and the less able it is to deliver the goods: religious
experience, deep mental model transformation, readily on tap and
ready-to-hand as is demonstrably possible and routinely expected in
Greco-Roman, Hellenistic-era, and shamanistic cultures.


— Michael Hoffman
http://www.egodeath.com — the simple theory of the ego-death and
rebirth experience based on robust, integrated coverage of
dissociation, determinism, cybernetics, and metaphor



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: egodeath Message: 4484 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 18/01/2006
Subject: Re: Defining the post-modern type of fame in “famous theorist”
The main, central idea here is that in the concept of "famous person",
there's a breakdown or deconstruction of that concept when the person
in question is a theorist of the illusory aspects of personhood. The
main emphasis in this point regarding the irony of the phrase is the
term 'person', not the term 'famous'. The interesting problem is akin
to being the person who is famous for proving that persons don't
exist. Like saying "famous person X is famous for <zap>" where <zap>
is the hitting of a singularity making for a thought that can't be
completed.

This scenario is opposite of, or the complement of, the idea of
"famous person X is famous for their fame", as in, "Madonna is
basically famous for her fame", itself held to be a postmodern idea.
Per Wilber, a "famous person" regarding ego death theory would need to
be *both* zapped/nonexistent, *and* a solid modern individual self, a
fully big somebody as well as a nobody, a famous person-and-nonperson.
Thus to locate my target theory of Ego Death, and target manner of
delivering the theory, I should want to be, in an integrated way, a
"famous person and famous nonperson".

The modern madman schizophrenic is Jesus Christ, and per Louis Sass,
is both omnipotent and a helplessly manipulated empty machinery. The
post-modern madman schizophrenic is Jesus Christ, Superstar. The
nature of schizophrenia changes in post-modernity.

The term 'postmodernity' seems cheap and superficial, like
'psychedelia'. The term 'post-modernity' seems more serious, with
more potential.

The disappearance and deconstructive dissolution of the modern self is
a cliched postmodernism idea. The postmodernism idea of "the
disappearance and deconstructive dissolution of the modern self" is a
*potentially* great idea, but suffers from the assumption that the
disappearance of the self is an entirely novel development (actually
the pre-modern era was expert at deliberately dissolving the
ego-self), and suffers from the failure to recognize the religious
enlightenment nature of the dissolution of the self into "sliding
signifiers with self-deconstructing referance" and the like. Such
half-baked postmodernism is primitive, degenerate postmodernism.

The Ego Death theory, being a modern-type systematic, specific
technology of a theory, is a *truly* post-modern treatment of ego
transcendence and self-deconstruction of personal control-power as an
autonomous agent moving oneself through spacetime. It is informed by
integrated multi-state perspective. The problem with shallow pop
postmodernism is that it is OSC-based, OSC-limited, merely a
single-state-informed perspective. Where postmodernism and
postmodernist treatment of the disappearance of the modern self are
informed by the altered state, that still doesn't count as a
multi-state-based view, because only with the arrival of the
full-fledged Ego Death theory is the altered state *integrated* with
late-modern culture.

There are 3 situations with regard to single-state vs.
multi-state-informed perspectives or scholarly models:

o Single-state informed; OSC-only-based; completely unaware of and
unfamiliar with the dissociative mystic altered cognitive state.

o Informed by the OSC and the ASC a little but without integrating
ASC into the overall worldmodel

o Informed by the OSC and also fully informed by the ASC, with the
ASC integrated into the overall worldmodel.

Postmodernism is informed by the ASC a little, without integration.
So for practical purposes, postmodernism is single-state-based; it
can't be said to be "based on" the ASC, but is merely fleetingly
acquainted with the ASC.
Group: egodeath Message: 4485 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 18/01/2006
Subject: Re: Lyrics: Shape of Things to Come (Max Frost; Barry Mann & Cynthi
Song: Shape of Things to Come
Performers: Max Frost and the Troopers
Paul Wybier, vocals.
Written by Barry Mann and Cynthia Weil
Reached #22 on the U.S. charts, Aug. 1968, Studio City, CA.
Compilations: Even More Nuggets (dual mono), Nuggets: Original
Artyfacts from the First Psychedelic Era 1965-1968 (mono).


There's a new sun
Rising up angry in the sky
And there's a new voice
Saying we're not afraid to die

Let the old world make believe
It's blind and deaf and dumb
But nothing can change the shape of things to come


There are changes
Lying ahead in every road
And there are new thoughts
Ready and waiting to explode

When tomorrow is today
The bells may toll for some
But nothing can change the shape of things to come


The future's coming in, now
Sweet and strong
Ain't no-one gonna hold it back for long


There are new dreams
Crowding out old realities
There's revolution
Sweeping in like a fresh new breeze

Let the old world make believe
It's blind and deaf and dumb
But nothing can change the shape of things to come
Group: egodeath Message: 4486 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 18/01/2006
Subject: Use the most recent lyrics version posted
When I re-post lyrics, please use the most recent version. I often
re-post lyrics with improvements including spelling, wording, or
formatting.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: egodeath Message: 4487 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 18/01/2006
Subject: Re: Problems to prevent while theory on auto-pilot
>>The main problems to prevent when I leave the ego death theory to be
self-sustaining are:



>>o People confusing each other by their misunderstanding,
misreading, or lack of really reading the theory definition, resulting
in propagating a noxious false imitation of the theory


People might propagate a distorted, falsified version of the ego death
theory because they intend to disparage, promote, or co-opt the ego
death theory.


>>o Unnecessarily limiting people's range of ideas that could
contribute toward the Ego Death theory. People should not think that
just because my theory is true in essence and is the final word as far
as the high-level outline, that every detail I've put forth is the
final word and my exact phrasing has to be parroted.


Especially, I am concerned about the scenario in which a person is
potentially in the throes of some threatening, ego-death crisis. I
don't know for certain whether the altered state, or truth,
necessarily and inherently *has to* lead to a situation of being
threatened by ego death crisis of some sort, or precisely what the
exact nature of the crisis is, or exactly and precisely how we should
think of the solution or way out of the supposed crisis. I have
defined a hypothesis so systematically and specifically and explicitly
that this definition meets the modern-era criteria to constitute a
'theory', but this remains a proposed theory, which is to say, a
proposed specific hypothesis that has undergone some compelling
confirmation through testing.

As modern-era thinkers realize, all knowledge is subject to revision,
even the pinnacle of modern scientific knowledge, Newtonian physics,
or for an example of greater revision, phlogiston or ether in the move
from proto-modern to modern chemistry.

I define an excellent theory of ego death crisis, by far the best and
most specific and plausible, but especially when it comes to such
powerful experiential matters, I do not intend to limit our thinking
on this matter. There seems to be an inevitable crisis, but perhaps
not necessarily; there seems to be transcendent assumptions of how we
can legitimately relate to or think about components involved in that
crisis to effect restabilization, but there might be some other way of
thinking about stabilization.
Group: egodeath Message: 4488 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 19/01/2006
Subject: Obit: Blaise Staples, entheogen scholar
The article below appears in the alt.obituaries Usenet group.
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=Blaise+Staples+entheogen&as_ugrou
p=alt.obituaries

I can't confirm the content. I haven't found any other URL about
this.

More about Dr. Staples:
http://www.google.com/search?q=Blaise+Staples+entheogen

________________________


B.D. Staples: studied sacred role of drugs

Boston Globe, December 6, 2005
By Emma Stickgold, Globe correspondent

Blaise Daniel Staples and a team of other scholars worked to unravel
the mystery of the role hallucinogens played in ancient Greek
religious life, demonstrating the sacred use of such substances in
some parts of history.

Rejecting the term "hallucinogen," Dr. Staples and others coined a new
term that is now used — entheogen — or "creating the divine within"
in ancient Greek.

In a number of books of books, Dr. Staples, his spouse Carl A.P. Ruck,
a Boston University professor, and others, outlined a theory that
mind-altering concoctions were part of everyday religious life and
were used by several prominent figures who helped shape Western
culture in ancient times.

Dr. Staples, an expert in ancient Greek and Latin studies and a
longtime Hull resident died Thursday at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical
Center. The cause of death was not released. He was 57.

From archaeological sites, ancient texts, and other labor-intensive
research, Dr. Staples and others pieced together evidence that
religious rituals often included a drug that altered a user's state of
mind. One example they cited was the use of a fungus similar to LSD
that may have been part of religious rituals.

As they explored the ties between religion and what are now considered
to be controlled substances, the scholarly team also delved into the
role such drugs played in European fairytales. In their research, they
pointed to the poisonous apple in Snow White, and the mushroom found
at the foot of Little Red Riding Hood when she encounters the wolf in
the forest, illustrating that the roots of such stories lie in part
with old traditions and religions, such as pagan shamanism.

"There's a considerable amount of evidence that something was eaten
and something was seen," Ruck said. "We also reconstructed what the
nature of the experience was."

The powerful substances, they theorized, were considered sacred by a
Greek religion that lasted for about 2,000 years. Those who abused the
drug were put to death for it, suggesting that addiction and narcotic
abuse are not just a modern phenomenon.

"People thought that before the present age nobody was interested,
which is just ridiculous," Ruck said.

Dr. Staples was born in Somerset, but lived in Ashville, N.C., until
age 9, then moved back to Somerset. He earned his bachelor's degree
from Boston University and master's and doctorate degrees in classical
studies from Brown University.

He was a "brilliant classicist," who could speak a half-dozen
languages fluently and had a passion for collecting antiques, his
friends and family said.

"My brother was an intellectual," said Margaret Ann Stafursky of
Martha's Vineyard. "My brother was very well-read, very well-spoken."

Dr. Staples was about 6 feet tall and had bright blue eyes and wispy
blond hair, his family said.

"He enjoyed laughing — he laughed a lot," said his mother. Marie I.
(Eagan) of Swansea. Still, she said, "He was a clam, quiet person."

And while Dr. Staples spent much of his time studying the classics, he
also had a soft spot for classical music and would play piano for
about an hour each day.

"He was lighthearted, he was kind, he was a gentleman," his sister
said.

Dr. Staples helped translate ancient texts into English and
collaborated with Ruck on several books, including "The Apples of
Apollo: Pagan and Christian Mysteries of the Eucharist," "The World of
Classical Myth: Gods and Goddesses, Heroines and Heroes," and "The
Hidden World: Survival of Pagan Shamanic Themes in European
Fairytales."

In the course of their writings, the composition of the sacramental
communion was analyzed, and mind-altering symbolic plants such as
mistletoe, Soma, and the fly agaric mushroom are tied to the myths of
Greek heroes. For at least one project, they collaborated with Swiss
chemist Albert Hofmann, who first examined the hallucinatory powers of
LSD, and with ethnomycologist R. Gordon Wasson.

Dr. Staples leaves his spouse, his mother, and his sister.

Services will be held at 11 a.m. today in the Rose E. Sullivan Funeral
Home on Somerset. Burial will be in St. Patrick's Cemetery in
Somerset.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: egodeath Message: 4489 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 19/01/2006
Subject: Re: Obit: Blaise Staples, entheogen scholar
Emma Stickgold wrote:
>>… the role hallucinogens played in ancient Greek religious life,
demonstrating the sacred use of such substances in some parts of
history.

Staples' circle of entheogen scholars has demonstrated the likely use
of visionary plants in many (not just some) parts of history, opening
the likelihood of many more.


>>… a theory that mind-altering concoctions were part of everyday
religious life and were used by several prominent figures who helped
shape Western culture in ancient times.

Entheogens were used by many prominent figures, not just several.


>>"There's a considerable amount of evidence that something was eaten
and something was seen," Ruck said. "We also reconstructed what the
nature of the experience was."

Their research focused more on evidence that visionary plants were
used, than on reconstructing the nature of the experience (based on
the subset of their works I've read).


>>… Those who abused the drug were put to death for it, suggesting
that addiction and narcotic abuse are not just a modern phenomenon.

"Abused" is misleading and ambiguous above. "Addiction and narcotic
abuse" is completely off-base, incorrect, and misleading above. I
suspect it is the reporter, not the entheogen scholars, formulating
that expression.


>>"People thought that before the present age nobody was interested,
which is just ridiculous," Ruck said.

The phrases "People thought", "the present age", and "was interested"
are all vague above. As an isolated statement, "People thought that
before the present age nobody was interested" is vague to the point of
meaninglessness, therefore the assertion "which is just ridiculus"
falls flat, as presented in the article.


>>Dr. Staples helped translate ancient texts into English and
collaborated with Ruck on several books, including …

Other authors contributed as well.
Group: egodeath Message: 4490 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 19/01/2006
Subject: Re: Problems to prevent while theory on auto-pilot
The actual experience of being offline (leaving the Theory on
autopilot) for a couple weeks exposed a few points as important to
make available; it actually generated new ideas about the "autopilot"
status including the new concept of "needs for autopilot
self-sustaining of the theory".

"Not posting" means staying silent regarding the death of researchers
in these fields. Such silence is more simply said than done.

My past few days' posts divide into 3 categories, or have aspects that
divide into 3 categories:

o Major importance, involving the special needs arising from putting
the theory on self-sustaining auto-pilot status for a year:
[egodeath] Judging imposter theories & 2nd-rate theories of egodeath/
t't knowledge
[egodeath] Strategy: Recognition of my scholarly priority of combining
x,y,z
[egodeath] Problems to prevent while theory on auto-pilot

o Major importance, not stemming from the special needs regarding
auto-pilot status:
[egodeath] Theory of Ersatz versus Authentic Religion
[egodeath] Splitting of control into 2 locuses; problem of trust,
alarm, & accommodation
[egodeath] Metaphor: Sacrifice to avert/placate the wrath/anger of the
gods

o Minor importance:
[egodeath] Metaphor: trampling on the cross and disparaging it
[egodeath] Metaphor: Sail behind head, ecstasy/ecstatic, Holy Spirit


Also difficult is that people email me questions and I have to quit
responding to them or else I'll be fully back into posting about the
theory again, under the sense of obligation and being compelled. I
have to laugh at seriousness and profundity, the importantness of
idea-connections, not being a slave to Significance. Now I think I
can go away from this project longer term, without leaving these basic
strategic points unaddressed.
Group: egodeath Message: 4491 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 19/01/2006
Subject: Ego death not about social humility relations
Someone in an unmoderated discussion group wrote:
>>Is it just me, or does this guy have one hell of an ego for somebody
who supposedly has experienced 'ego death'?


The most shallow and irrelevant dismissal of the Ego Death theory is
that I make no great show of social humility. It is unclear whether
that off-base pseudo-criticism of the theory is causing any actual
harm, or whether it is such a harmless cheap trick, a typically
brazenly and obviously cheap online discussion social-sparring move
that no one takes seriously.


The theory of ego death is not essentially about social-level concerns
(or mundane conduct-of-life, either), and it is not essentially
motivated by social-level drives. The theory of ego death is about
personal control agency in the mature adult with a fully developed,
fairly independent and solid, stable ego (stable while in the OSC and
with respect to inter-egoic social relations).

The theory of ego death is motivated by commensurate concerns: how the
mature, solid, socially stable ego becomes interestingly unstable when
subjected to the experiential data of the intense dissociative mystic
altered state, and how restabilization occurs, discovering and
retaining transcendent knowledge. Transcendent knowledge isn't
essentially about developing and transcending the adolescent
social-level ego, but rather, transcending the mature, fully developed
egoic modern-era adult ego, producing the basically fully developed
'transpersonal ego' — that is, the fully developed transpersonal self
structure and mental worldmodel.


In terms of psychological development per Ken Wilber's system, the
unmoderated discussion groups such as most Usenet newsgroups are
permanently stuck at an archetypally early adolescent level of
immaturity causing all such postings to be in the coin of social
relations. Late-modern scholars look back to the Roman imperial
hierarchy of honor and shame and think that's an alien system, but the
motivating spirit of today's unmoderated newsgroups is a similar
spirit of being all driven by the concern with social standing, with
degrees of honor and shame, of who is better (in a social sense) than
whom.

Such online "exchange" forums function primarily as social sparring
grounds; let no one make the gross category error of gullibly taking
serious the claim that discussion groups are focused on their nominal
topic scope. A group nominally for informational exchange about cats
is, in practice, a group that is actually utilized for the purpose of
social manna exchange or "points" exchange, of a social sparring and
social relations nature.

Tellingly, the posts that provide a pseudo-critique of the ego death
theory by presuming to measure my degree of social humility, as though
'ego death' is about having a small social-ego, also say they have no
idea what's meant by "deterministic self-control cancellation",
"block-universe determinism and Necessity", or "divine
predestination". That is, the people who commit the frivolous error
of meaning-crossover of assuming that 'ego death' essentially concerns
inter-egoic social relations are people who are wholly unaware of
religious ego death.

Being unfamiliar with and unconcerned with mystic-state ego death,
they fall back to the assumption that 'ego' in 'ego death' must mean
inter-egoic social relations. Thus they imagine and assume that the
theory of ego death must be a theory of inter-egoic social relations
of humility. Wilber does discuss a social-level 'ego death' as part
of a systematic discussion of some 10 different kinds of 'ego death',
one per psychospiritual developmental stage.

In terms of that Wilber model, the adolescent-level typical
participants in online unmoderated discussion groups naturally assume
that 'ego death' concerns the psychological developmental level they
are at: to them, any theorizing activity could only be motivated by
inter-egoic social relations, and 'ego death' must be about the death
of the social-level ego, as though it were titled "the theory of the
death of the social-level ego" or "the theory of social-ego reduction,
and of humility in inter-egoic relations".

In an early book, Wilber describes the different kind of "death" found
in each level of psychospiritual development. The social level of
psychospiritual development assumes that 'ego' and 'ego death' are all
about social humility and social relations. The unmoderated
discussion groups are primarily driven by social needs; the nominal
topic of each group is immediately ignored and the function of the
groups has an overwhelming tendency to switch to socializing and
social battling of relative standing of the social egos.

That mentality can only think in terms of a kind of 'ego death' that
is centered around social egoic relations; the kind of people drawn
together into such an arrangement are more like struggling to develop
a solid ego in the first place, as opposed to having a solid,
developed ego taken for granted, and being interested in transcending
it.

I don't buy into the whole paradigm of "psychospiritual development
through stages", but it does provide some useful generalizations. The
Greek and non-modern cultural practices of psychospiritual development
utilized and incorporated, in a culturally integrated way, an
ASC-based series of initiations for youths, contradicting many aspects
of Wilber's generalized model of psychospiritual development. In
ASC-based cultures, psychospiritual development jumps from the
post-adolescent youth stage, basically bypassing entirely or leaping
over the OSC-based "adult" stage that is so predominant and central in
the modern era, jumping straight to the transpersonal stage, without,
however, the benefit we possess, of having developed such a strong,
intensely egoic autonomous adult self as reigned supreme in the modern
era.

The ancients and pre-moderns were expert at the transpersonal stage
except with the limitation that they were weaker at the adult egoic
stage. You can't be completely developed into the transpersonal stage
if you haven't developed much of an adult egoic self. However, most
of the adult egoic self is already developed by the time one is an
older youth. These stages can be pressed to develop fairly quickly,
if the culture supports such an efficient developmental program.
Wilber lately acknowledges that development isn't exactly a sequence
of stages like levels in a videogame.

A person basically at the transpersonal stage is still continuing to
develop their social-ego and their adult autonomous ego to some
extent. To be *well* advanced into the transpersonal stage requires
being well advanced in all of the "previous" stages as well, including
social-ego development.

There's a minor but initially confusing weakness of the titling of
"the ego death theory". People who don't know anything about
religious ego death, or who are motivated by trying to distort other
people's meaning for social reasons, import the wrong one of the
conventional various meanings of 'ego' into their portrayal of the
concept "ego death". They simply *assume* — or social-maliciously
pretend — that the term 'ego' in "ego death" is the same as the
meaning of 'ego' in "he has too big of an ego" (a statement about
social relations). That is a specific common error of incongruously
switching meanings or crossing meanings inappropriately. Such a
crossover of meaning is completely common among non-serious thinkers
(outsiders to the subject of religious ego death) and completely
worthless.

The dynamics of the social ego is one thing, 'ego death' is something
quite different, involving religious transformation. The term-usage
'ego' in 'ego death', as used by all people who are seriously
discussing the ego death experience, is never simply the same as the
term-usage 'ego' in "he has too big of an ego". It is entirely
erroneous to think as though the term 'ego' means the same thing in
the phrases "he had a religious experience of ego death" and "he has
too big of an ego".

That invalid jump or crossover of meaning would lead to complete
confusion if anyone took it seriously. No serious thinker about
religious ego death makes such an absurd, inappropriate silent
crossover of meaning. No serious thinker about religious ego death
assumes and takes it for granted that the term 'ego' in the phrase
"religious ego death" means the same as in the phrase "socially
oversized ego".

The young person who is developmentally at the level of the social-ego
sees that there's an "ego death theory" online and looks forward to
manna exchange of social-level points, whether sparring or positive
social interaction, and is disappointed to realize that the theory is
not concerned with the social-level realm, but about the endpoint of
the adult egoic realm with a finished-developing adult ego, moving
into the transpersonal realm. There's some form of pre-trans fallacy
involved when immature social-level egoic thinkers approach the ego
death theory with the expectation that 'ego' there means the online
socially sparring self and the self that can exhibit social humility
and public inter-egoic self-deprecation.

If the mature, fully developed OSC-based adult modern ego is
considered "the ego" or "the mature egoic level" per Wilber, then the
normal, strongly predominant level found in the unmoderated discussion
groups is the pre-egoic level, while the theory is concerned with the
trans-egoic level. Pre-egoic adolescent-type thinkers who are
exchanging manna in the discussion groups (not exchanging adult-level
egoic information) are inherently constitutionally inclined to
evaluate an "ego death theory" in pre-egoic terms, so that they are
only capable of imagining and considering a pre-egoic type of theory
of 'ego' transcendence.

The typical discussion groups are pre-egoic, but the theory of ego
transcendence is trans-egoic. The 'trans-' prefix in 'trans-egoic'
means both "after" and "across all stages"; that is, "after ego" and
"across all stages, integrating them, including the adolescent social
ego and the mature adult ego". The pre-egoic, social-level thinker is
only capable of mis-reading or down-shifting the meaning of the claim
that "the discussion groups are pre-egoic and the theory is
post-egoic". The pre-egoic thinker is bound to take that as a claim
only that the theorizer is a superior person with superior
social-level humility.

Generally, the transcendent person *is* a superior person that
possesses, in an important sense, superior social-level humility, but
that's not at all the important point and driving value and goal of
transcendent knowledge, just a mundane-level side-effect. The
pre-egoic thinker is inherently consitutionally blind to the value and
goal of transcendent knowledge, which is to deconstruct the already
fully developed mature adult ego — an ego which is already past the
social-ego developmental stage — and re-construct the mental
worldmodel to result in the trans-egoic, post-egoic mental worldmodel.


This is related to the saying "don't cast pearls before swine" and
"keep wisdom secret lest the vulgar mock it": that is, the pre-egoic
thinker is inherently constitutionally incapable of thinking about and
considering the theory of ego death, which is a trans-egoic structure.


The pre-egoic thinker looks for concerns with social-level matters in
the ego death theory, doesn't find them, and goes away merely confused
and puzzled, like a child watching an adult-oriented movie or reading
an adult-level book. The critique "the ego death theory is strange
and worthless because the theorizer isn't falling over themselves in a
show of social-level humility" is essentially and typically a
pre-egoic sparring attempt or social-manna oriented effort to assess a
trans-egoic structure, two levels above the pre-egoic level. It's a
matter of the pre-adult attempting to assess the post-adult, resulting
in a kind of pre/trans fallacy.

A similar misfiring occurs when children review the Animatrix and
automatically assume that the quality of a short is simply a function
of how photorealistic it is: regardless of the substantial content of
a short, the child reviewers automatically give the highest ratings to
the most photorealistic shorts, solely on that basis without
mentioning any other possible consideration, and give the lowest
ratings to the shorts with the most impressionistic animation style.
Such thinking would rank classic high art below photography because
the latter is a more perfect reproduction (of the surface).

The adolescent online, when considering a theory of ego death, is only
capable of looking for adolescent-level aspects and testing for
adolescent-level motives in any theory of ego death; they are only
capable of interpreting 'ego' or 'ego death' in terms of social
sparring and social relations and social humility because that's the
only level of ego development they know and take as possible.

The pre-egoic mind can't imagine the mature adult ego, which is not
centrally motivated and driven by social-developmental and
social-relational concerns, and what the concerns of the adult-level
ego are, and what it would mean to transcend the adult-level ego.
Such minds don't know what the adult-level ego is, so can't imagine or
understand what's involved in transcending the adult ego. The early
egoic conception of 'ego transcendence' is an egoic conception of ego
transcendence, like egoic-level religion.

Much religion, as Watts writes of Zen training in practice, is
pre-egoic — trying to assist the development of the mature
adult-level ego in the first place. Much distortion and limitation in
religion is due to the pre-egoic-to-egoic level of development the
religion serves, training the person toward adult-level
conduct-of-life — mixed with the childish aspects of magical
supernatural thinking, not actually transcendent high "magic" and the
trans-natural cognitive or 'spiritual' level.

Much of Islam, Christianity, and Buddhism is "bunk religion" in that
it is pre-egoic training toward egoic functioning, rather than
focusing on development from the egoic to the trans- or post-egoic,
transpersonal level of functioning.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: egodeath Message: 4492 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/01/2006
Subject: Definitions, glossary, terms, terminology, abbreviations, acronyms
OSC — ordinary state of consciousness; the ordinary, default
cognitive state

ASC — altered state of consciousness; the dissociative cognitive
state

The Ego Death theory — the theory that religion is primarily and
originally concerned with the entheogen-induced intense dissociative
cognitive state; the pre-setness, unchangeability, and inevitability,
and unavoidability of one's own future thoughts; the problematic
limitations of autonomous self-control cybernetics in personal agency;
and metaphors describing these experiences and experiential insights.

Heimarmene — Necessity, Fatedness, frozen-time block-universe
determinism, the unavoidability and unchangeability of future thoughts
and actions


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: egodeath Message: 4493 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 22/01/2006
Subject: Original meaning of Christianity in its primary context, applicabil
New Testament Christianity was communal mystic unity put into the
service of large-scale sociopolitical unity against the Roman imperial
religiously justified ideology or political theology. The early
Catholic redactors who formed this Christianity from earlier pieces
(such as Marcion's gnostic Paul figure and Jewish Wisdom writings)
used communal mystic unity strategically to form a sociopolitical
power network. The creators of the canonical New Testament system
treated mystic enlightenment as a tool to apply to build up organized
sociopolitical power.

The New Testament editors utilized the era's standard mastery of
mystic-state metaphor to direct the Jewish mystic-metaphor system into
the figure of Jesus, in such a way as to sweep together everyone.
That was the purest, most definitive form of Christianity, captured in
the New Testament. New Testament Christian sayings are co-optive
transformations of "Old Testament" Jewish sayings ("atonement for sin
and death"), Roman imperial-theology sayings ("the gospel of the son
of god"), or Gnostic proto-Christian sayings ("archons, spiritual
powers in the heavens"). New Testament Christianity also comprises
rewritings of Josephus and Hellenistic mystic-metaphor novels.

When the Caesar-based Roman empire was no more, Christianity as
counternarrative had to change and deviate from its original meaning
and strategic formation to push against the Devil instead, defining
itself as opposition to the devil. Pure original New Testament
Christianity is that which is reflected in the New Testament, but that
Christianity ceased to exist when the title of Caesar stopped being
used after 415 CE.


There are several kinds of 'Christianity' as defined per era:

o Pre-New Testament proto-Christianity including Marcionite Gnostic
Christianity (individual and sometimes communal mystic unity with
little sociopolitical unity, defining itself against the
Heimarmene-Demiurge and spiritual prison-gatekeepers). Early Gnostic
proto-Christianity. Entirely ASC-based (mystic altered state of
consciousness-based). ASC-based perception of Heimarmene is taken for
granted as the starting point, and the driving objective is to
transcend Heimarmene.

o New Testament counter-Caesar Christianity (communal mystic unity
put into the service of large-scale sociopolitical unity against the
Roman imperial political theology). Early Catholic Christianity.
Christianity proper; this is the main, definitive form. Primarily
ASC-based, with the main strategy being to apply the ASC and all
available ASC-based metaphor-systems (understood to be such) to form a
sociopolitical power-configuration strong enough to be an alternative
to the Roman imperial system. Heimarmene-centric — puts equal
emphasis on Heimarmene and transcending Heimarmene; but always directs
that concern into putting both in service of forming a powerful
sociopolitical counter-configuration.

o Post-Caesar Christianity (communal mystic unity put into the
service of self-defining sociopolitical configuration, defining itself
against the Devil, Jews, heretics, and the Turk). Later Catholic
Christianity (after 415 CE). Largely ASC-based. Most or many among
the lay, ordained, and monastics understood almost as much about
ASC-metaphor and the counternarrative-to-Caesar meaning as in the
Early Catholic (New Testament formation) era.

o Modern Christianity (nonmystical theoretical and emotional communal
unity put into the service of sociopolitical configuration, defining
itself against the Devil and the modern world). OSC-based;
single-state-based Christianity (ordinary state of
consciousness-based). Starting around 1700. Reformed theology
(1517+) puts the entire emphasis on the predestination of who is
salvifically regenerated; unlike the earlier types of Christianity,
modern Christianity doesn't emphasize transcending Heimarmene.


Any analysis of what 'Christianity' is must start with New Testament
Christianity, where the original shape and meaning of Christianity and
Christian themes is formatively defined. Gnostic Christianity can
only be considered proto-Christianity. Christianity proper,
definitive Christianity, is New Testament Christianity. There is no
way to understand later Catholic Christianity post 415, without first
understanding the workings of New Testament Christianity.

New Testament Christianity is the central type of Christianity that is
most key for understanding and arranging all forms of Christianity.
Above all, any form of Christianity must be studied in relation or
contrast to New Testament Christianity — that's the only way to make
coherent sense of any given variant version of Christianity.


Modern Christianity is so far from the roots of Christian meaning,
it's pointless and futile to try to provide real clarity of
understanding and explain what the coherent doctrine is, if speaking
in modern-era terms and conceptual categories. The way to unravel and
repair modern doctrine to make it coherent is to withdraw from modern
thinking systems about Christianity, and go back and properly
understand New Testament Christianity in its counter-Caesar context
(45 BCE – 415 CE). Only then can one explain what the modern doctrine
would be, to be coherent, including application of "Christianity" to
today's world.

New Testament Christianity was designed to counter the system of
Caesars through communal mystic unity experience. Today we have
neither communal mystic unity (only a placebo entheogen, in the
imitation Eucharist), not the system of Caesars as such, so right
away, the main two aspects of the New Testament Christianity strategy
aren't directly and immediately applicable.

Thus we have to do a distant extrapolation: if "Christianity" means
the strategy of applied communal mystic unity within the context of
the Roman empire, then given today's context of modernity, what would
be today's strategy; what would be coherently authentic Christianity
(or as close as the parallel could be, a quasi-Christianity) in the
modern era? What would be the most accurate parallel to New Testament
Christianity in the late modern era? It would be a kind of
mystery-religion initiation, with a strong communal focus (communal
mystic unity), set against overblown, quasi-religiously justified
sociopolitical government.

New Testament Christianity isn't necessarily a good, desirable model
to emulate, in its specifics. New Testament Christianity might not
provide the best sociopolitical configuration, and it might not use
the best mystic metaphor system. The metaphor system used in New
Testament Christianity is today culturally remote, alien, irrelevant,
puzzling, confusing, and incomprehensible — merely baffling, not
helpful. The purpose of New Testament Christianity was to set up
communal mystic unity in such a way as to produce an alternate
sociopolitical configuration, an alternate to the Roman hierarchical
system and sociopolitical system. But is the alternate sociopolitical
configuration that was provided through the New Testament a model we
should want to select?

We'd be better off applying the essential "moves" of New Testament
Christianity in a more general way. The most general strategic idea
of the New Testament is to use the ASC to support an alternate
sociopolitical configuration to the current flawed predominant
sociopolitical configuration including an alternate to the latter's
religious claim of justification. 'Christianity' is essentially the
general idea of applying ASC-based mental worldmodel transformation
(about time, self, and control) and its experiential-insight
revelation toward providing an alternate sociopolitical configuration
to whatever the current flawed predominant sociopolitical
configuration is.

What's needed is a major comprehensive translation to late-modern and
post-modern conceptual structures and metaphors. Christianity is a
counter-narrative to what is now a lost and mostly irrelevant
narrative (Roman imperial theology, Pax Romana, the honor/shame
hierarchy), too culturally distant to be useful and helpful and
effective. This may be one reason for the pre-modern popularity of
Western Esotericism, and is a reason for the popularity of American
Buddhism: Buddhism as pictured in America lacks the culturally
overspecific components of New Testament Christianity.

New Testament Christianity is overly tied to the particular cultural
specifics of the Roman imperial era. The metaphors and expressions in
Buddhism seem less culturally-circumscribed. The practical usefulness
of New Testament Christianity is limited to the context in which it
was formed. Its usefulness rapidly falls off, when it is taken
outside that original formative, primary context. The primary context
of New Testament Christianity is the Roman imperial era; New Testament
Christianity was successfully optimized to battle a particular foe.

New Testament Christianity was fairly well applicable to its second
context — pre-modern Europe (415-1700). But New Testament
Christianity is hopelessly remote from the modern context; only a
garble of confusion can result from this degree of culture-gap. The
surface themes and the specifics of the driving strategy of New
Testament Christianity were designed to be meaningful and effective in
the context of the Roman empire, not in the context of the modern era.


The kind of "update" of Christianity that would be required for
"Christianity" to be useful, coherent, and effective today is like the
jump from a pre-CUI program design (like character-mode software
applications before pull-down menus, before the Common User Interface
conventions were established) to a full-on standard GUI environment
(graphical user interface with multiple windows, pull-down menus,
pixels instead of character grid, and mouse pointer). When you're
facing such a wide platform gap, such a different context and style in
which your program needs to run, adjusting the coding isn't going to
work; you need to scrap the product and create an entirely new product
code base, even if the same essential functionality is provided in the
old and new system.

The themes of 'promised land', crucifixion, and 'Caesar as Lord and
savior' are all more baffling than helpful and enlightening in this
cultural era. And the criteria the New Testament provides as an
alternative sociopolitical configuration, with a focus on eliminating
the honor/shame hierarchy, are irrelevant. Like the New Testament
Christians, we need to formulate an alternate sociopolitical
configuration, as something to support with the ASC, but the changes
from the predominant system they were focused on making are quite
different than the changes we'd need to make today.

Even the basic ecclesiastic idea of "association network gatherings to
experience the ASC together and form a social and financial network"
might not be the right framework today for providing an alternate
sociopolitical configuration. Even with a completely accurate and
perfect understanding of New Testament Christianity, it seems likely
that the bottom line is, New Testament Christianity has much less to
offer us, mystically or sociopolitically, than it offered in its
original primary context, and both its metaphor-framework and
sociopolitical strategy need to be replaced by something like a new
metaphor-framework and a different sociopolitical strategy, including
a different way of applying the ASC (and its transformational
revelations) toward sociopolitical improvement.

Even the most basic New Testament strategy-idea of "provide an
alternative sociopolitical configuration within the existing society"
might no longer be strategically effective. We also have to question
and make an explicit principled justification of the basic New
Testament strategy-idea of "apply the ASC's revealed transcendent
knowledge toward an improved sociopolitical configuration".

If we retain the metaphors and basic strategy of Christianity but
drastically co-opt and rework them to force them to become directly
relevant to personal mystical transformation and sociopolitical
transformation today, we'll share something in common with the New
Testament creators: they resisted the status quo system by drastically
co-opting and reworking Jewish religious themes, and Gnostic and
Ruler-cult themes. They co-opted and reconfigured all existing
resources, rather than engineering a system entirely from scratch.

The proto-Catholic New Testament editors cobbled together existing
systems with a slight twist, such as the canonical Pauline redirection
of the Jewish metaphor-arena so as to lead into the Jesus
dying-and-resurrecting godman metaphor-arena. That approach made for
an often confusing mish-mash of clashing metaphor-systems, a mix that
only worked well in its original, primary context — late Hellenistic
culture, a culture which mastered such syncretic mystic-state and
political metaphor-systems (using metaphors which were then current
and active, not dead and barely decipherable).

The New Testament editors used metaphor-mastery to co-opt the Jewish
religion to form and channel into their desired
useful-in-their-context version of the Christian religion. An
approximately equivalent contemporary move would be to portray the ego
death theory, along with some sociopolitical improvement strategy, as
the applied religious philosophy that the Old Testament and then the
New Testament points to, or that all religions point to to the extent
that they are authentically mystically transformative and
sociopolitically emancipating.


Related posting:
Motive of Church: organizational control, not literalism or
anti-mysticism
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/egodeath/message/4338 (November 24,
2005)


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: egodeath Message: 4494 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 23/01/2006
Subject: Controversy, shunning, un-citeability, mega paradigm shift, opportu
The theory of ego death has clusters of controversial points,
groupable into dissociation, determinism, cybernetics, and metaphor.

_________________

Controversial points forming the ego death theory, even including
seemingly contradictory controversies:

Dissociation:

o Religions are firmly based in the entheogen-induced intense
dissociative altered state, throughout history.

o Visionary plants, not various activities, have always been the main
mystic methods.

o Against many authors, mysticism and mystic revelation is rational.

o Only thoughts might exist.

o It's most useful to suppose that referents, not just thoughts,
exist.

o Authentic religion requires moderately intense dissociation.

o The main way of accessing mystic dissociation has always been
hands-down the use of visionary plants.

o What's a visionary plant depends on usage; opium and cannabis and
henbane historically, functionally fall into the category 'visionary
plants'.


Determinism:
o Determinism is the case.

o Sequential determinism is an unwarranted view.

o Timeless single-future pre-set future, is the type of determinism
that's the case.

o Transcending determinism transrationally was a key theme in Western
religion.

o A person's entire subjective life is a snake-shaped worldline
frozen into spacetime, with time as a space-like dimension.


Cybernetics:
o The essence of peak mystic experiential insight is the threat of
harmful loss of control.

o We are unable to avoid our own near-future thoughts and movements
of will, including the thought of unavoidable coerced loss of control.

o Actions of agents everywhere in all times are frozen and
interlocked together.


Metaphor:
o Myth is, much more than any other purpose, the description of
entheogen-induced dissociative experiencing.

o Myth has nothing to do with dreaming or with ordinary-state rituals
or ordinary-state life adventures.

o Religious initiation into mystic experiential insight in the
dissociative is required, for a person to be considered mature and
educated.

o Modern-type, OSC-based religion is bunk (limited and irrelevant).
Modern-type, OSC-based Science is bunk (limited and irrelevant).
Pre-modern metaphor-dependent systematizations of transcendent
knowledge are grossly inefficient.

o The proper "context" to make sense out of New Testament
Christianity is not the Jewish religion, but rather, Roman imperial
theology/ideology.


o Various other controversial views.

_________________

Seeing the current backwards state of scholarship and theory in all
the key areas — a conspiracy of cluelessness running across all the
key fields involved in the ego death theory — and seeing that I'm 5
or 30 years or 100 years ahead of my time, my mood and hopefulness for
the potential reception of the ego death theory wavers.

This feeling especially comes from reading the comments of those who
have no significant knowledge of the dissociative state, but are
utterly confident in their disparaging, conventional, dismissive views
of it — especially those who brand themselves as "atheists". They
have all sorts of dismissive notions about the mystic altered state —
torrents of misunderstandings, a tidal wave. This amounts to the kind
of total disagreement, an entire incommensurable paradigm — but in
the case of the ego death theory, an entire systemic set of multiple
incommensurable paradigms.

The status quo has a bunk thought-world about myth over here, a bunk
thought-world about Christian origins over there, an ill-formed notion
of determinism elsewhere, a head full of fuzz and fog on the subject
of the mystic altered state, with self-control and schizophrenia
relegated to their own distant isolated compartments. The ego death
theory provides all the answers, and to questions that merely *should*
be asked, but the answers can't be received by the culture unless the
theory is expected to not only reconfigure each of these fields, but
also and especially reconfigure the relative arrangement of all these
fields to newly conjoin them as a set for the first time in the modern
world.

It's hopeless: with the suppression of the altered state, with the
distorting filtering of publications that results from the conditions
of prohibition, from the refusal of academic establishment to admit
and refusal to even allow discussion of Jesus' historicity or Pauline
authenticity across the board, given the backwards state of entheogen
scholars' tepid assumptions, given the hopelessly OSC-based state of
discussions of determinism and "philosophy", it would seem that there
cannot be any hope for the reception of the ego death theory, which
requires combining these areas, even though that theory perfectly
explains all sorts of problems that are so far ahead of today's
thoughts, the problems haven't even been consciously formulated as
problems needing solution.

Instead, scholars and authors have simply become acclimated and
accustomed to slumbering in familiar views on religion and myth, even
though those views don't make any sense — for example, the way the
(modern) orthodox story of Christian origins makes no sense, is
entirely implausible, but *seems* coherent due to its mere, sheer
familiarity. Modern-era scholars across fields have become accustomed
to theories of myth that make no sense but are comfortably *familiar*,
debates about determinism that fail to be the least bit aware of the
rich history of determinism… in scope, this predicament is
comparable to that of Ken Wilber, when he confronted and faced the
endless, dead-end standoff between "scientific psychology" and
"religion".

When I enter a field to read the latest attempts at treating it, such
as Doherty's efforts to reconstruct Christian origins, there's a
feeling of hopelessness, of facing a sheer rock cliff of
misunderstanding, a vast edifice of category-errors. The current
theories are *all wrong*, not even in the right ballpark. Sometimes
others wrote this of my radical views, or even just of the Dutch
Radical Critics' views that no Pauline epistles are authentic. The
gap is *so* wide, today's views are *so* benighted in so many ways, I
can't cite them and they can't cite me.

I'm an integrated-circuit designer in a steam-engine age. The ego
death theory is far too early, way too far ahead of its time. That's
a topic in Science Studies: "premature discoveries"; groundbreaking
discoveries that are correct and would've been immensely influential
except that they were too far ahead of their time.

All scholarly researchers have compelling reasons to read the theory
of ego death, and reasons not to acknowledge it, mainly because it's
too controversial, but also because — for that same reason — it is
hard for me to pull it together for publishing in today's out of
touch, full of baloney world. Because today's world is so full of
baloney in all the key ways, this opportunity arises, ironically and
paradoxically. A drama needs an antagonist, or there couldn't be a
role and need for a protagonist. If the theorist of ego death brings
great enlightenment, the implication is that there's great
endarkenment.

It is striking how much of a cut-and-dry, slam-dunk case there is for
no historical Jesus, but instead, for the mythic and
political-strategic nature of the New Testament. The modern
predominant establishment assumption of the historicist, literalist,
and superstitious nature of the New Testament is a temporary modern
error based on the lack of the entheogen, so right here two of the
main controversial points are seen to be intertwined.

Actually, many mythicists (scholars who deny the historicity of Jesus)
welcome the entheogen theory with open arms, no problem, but the hard
fact is, like Freke & Gandy, they just plain have their arms too full
of too much controversy and burden, already.

Earl Doherty is doing a perfect, excellent job of making the purely
OSC-based case for ahistoricity — I just regret I am too burdened to
build a bridge for him to understand the entheogen aspects of what
happened in Christian origins, and he's too burdened to pay attention
to that aspect of the ego death theory. So it's not necessarily that
scholars will deliberately shun the ego death theory and fail to cite
it; rather, they're too burdened to think about such a composite,
multi-controversy theory.

I chose to eliminate most traces of rebuttal and controversy in the
short ego death article, and I'm feeling these controversies now
indirectly.


It is stunning what a slam-dunk victory for the case for the
non-historicity of Jesus is waiting in the wings, with academics
utterly sitting ducks, caught with no pants, utterly without any
possible rebuttal — the debate will be catastrophic. And all that is
true, even *without* questioning Paul's historicity, even *without*
any awareness of the altered state. Strategically, the case for
Jesus' historicity might have to be made without any mention of Paul's
ahistoricity or the altered state, although the latter topics buttress
the former in the only way that truly provides a coherent and
completely successful explanation of Christian origins and the
original meaning of New Testament writings in their ancient cultural
context.

On the internet, and throughout information space, I'm out there
decades ahead of the mainstream, at the leading edge of the leading
edge, in that field — that's not so problematic; I could cite those
leading-edge researchers, and them, me. However, I'm *also* out there
on the leading edge of 3-5 other fields as well, decades ahead of the
mainstream — *that* is the problem. That's where I start to doubt
the viability of the theory — it might just have to molder and be
forgotten for 30 years to wait for the world to catch up.

Maybe I will have the rest of my life to leisurely write an adequate
book. The very endarkenment of the world is what enables this
opportunity to be so far ahead of the pack; opportunity is a function
of elsewhere-unfulfilled potential. So it all balances out: the ego
death theory solves a thousand problems, "revealing all knowledge,
laying it open to the world", and is 30 years too far ahead of its
time to be received. The theory has all the answers — and today's
paradigms are so deluded, they cannot receive and plug in these
answers, which come with a condition attached — it's a monolithic set
of multiple-paradigm-shattering drastic swap-outs of multiple
worldviews in multiple fields all at the same time, a huge horse pill
to swallow in Philip K. Dick fashion.

The ego death theory gives the modern world of thought a choice
requiring a massive system-wide transformation/conversion: a
mega-paradigm shift. People today *say* they want a paradigm shift,
they *think* they do, but they really can only handle baby sips, not
the firehose. I provide no paradigm shift; instead, the ego death
theory provides a mega-paradigm-shift, as though Descartes and Newton
and Einstein were thrown back in time together into 1600.

It's too much, too sweeping, too soon; too catastrophic, a hundred
times more than the popular current cry for the alternate truth about
Christianity (Dan Brown's Da Vinci Code, the Dead Sea Scrolls). The
ancient writings do shake the foundation of the church and the entire
history of Western civilization, but in such a different kind of
sweeping effect than expected, when even Paul is erased, and then even
more so, when combined with the entheogen theory of religion (not
exactly a separate subject, rather a distinct dimension of pre-modern
European religion), and then bringing in self-control chaos and
determinism and also transcending that.

I'm not here worried about how to present the theory — I feel that's
settled. It'll be low-key, matter of fact, just-the-facts, no-big
deal. I'm here only worrying about writers who can readily see some
merit in one aspect I cover but not the other aspects.

There are so many fallacies, so many misguided assumptions and
worldviews, I have not made very impressive headway in even explaining
my view in particular forums — there are too many adjustments
required; no amount of trickery and strategy, no short or long
article, can easily deal with this most basic problem. How can you
communicate a correct theory to a civilization that is *completely*
backwards and deluded? There's no common place to establish a
communication pipe.

We hold entirely different assumptions about almost everything;
there's no common ground of ways of thinking; it's like an ancient and
modern trying to have a conversation, or a shaman and a modern
scientist, or a modern Christian and an early house-church Christian.
An entirely different worldview is required spanning many fields that
currently aren't even recognized as being related (that's part of the
innovation of the ego death theory, and by the same token, a part of
the difficulty in connecting the theory into today's so-messed-up
thought-world).


Composite controversies making up the ego death theory:

o There was no historical Jesus, apostles, or Paul. Most entheogen
scholars balk at this, and philosophers of determinism see no need to
soil their name associating with this seemingly unrelated
controversial topic.

o The entire nature and spirit of the New Testament and associated
early Christian writings was entirely different than the modern
misreading.

o Religions are firmly based in the entheogen-induced intense
dissociative altered state, throughout history. This maximal theory
contradicts the currently predominant view of entheogen scholars, and
the entire subject of visionary plants is potentially a 3rd rail
too-hot topic. What academic would dare cite an article that not only
adheres to the moderate liberal position that drugs can simulate
traditional mystic methods, but takes it to the radical extreme —
while also denying not only Jesus, but Paul too, and also, insists on
dragging in a spotlight onto the topic of determinism, and not only
that, but offends the determinists and Reformed theologians by
positive coverage of transcending determinism?


John M. Allegro was ruined upon saying that Jesus was none other than
the mushroom, used secretly in the small circle of original
Christians. I'm not a moderate and establishment conformist like
Allegro. Against Allegro's moderate, wimpy, tepid, fence-sitting
views, I'm saying that the entire crew of New Testament authors and
figures was nonhistorical, and that the entire culture was based on
everyone using the full range of visionary plants.


The Ego Death theory is a complex monolithic combination of
controversial ideas that people have to sign onto wholesale, for
coherent results to manifest. Good radical views ought to be
systematically consistent radical views, which is why I strongly
disparage Earl Doherty's mere unthinking assumption that Paul was
historical, but at last recently he has started talking with some
deliberate caution about that assumption.

I understand why, as an unimaginative, single-state-limited, atheist,
scorched-earth dogmatic anti-religionist, he is ignorant of the mystic
state and entheogens, but he has no such excuse to hide behind
regarding his (until recently) careless assumption of Paul's
historicity. Similarly, I, James Arthur, and Jack Herer have
criticized half-baked radicalism: when it comes to non-Christian
religions, tepid and status-quo-preserving entheogen scholars assume
that the deity is none other than the entheogenic plant, but for no
reason, Jesus is given a special exception and treated as a historical
person who is a user of the visionary plant.

The present posting provides a convenient inventory of all the
controversial reasons, the monolithic network of controversial
reasons, why it could be difficult for an academic scholar to cite the
Ego Death theory. For me to publish in a peer-reviewed journal, where
is the journal and where are the peers who each are qualified to judge
on Paul's historicity and the maximal entheogen theory and a vertical,
tenseless-time version of determinism as the core of Western religious
history and the details of rationality-based harmful loss of control
and thought-coercion along with the theory of schizophrenic
dissociative-state transcendent insights, as well as the way
Christianity was formed by mystic-state metaphors interwoven with
Ruler Cult?

Who is positioned to evaluate my overthrow of Jung and Campbell and
the entire academic establishment regarding Christian origins and
introduce the rational altered state into the philosophy of
determinism, all at the same time in an interwoven system? Where are
my peers for the peer-reviewed journal? Where is the journal of
transcendent knowledge covering the history of determinism,
self-control cybernetics, visionary plants as mainstream religion, and
dissociative-state mythic metaphor?

By the ossified academic standards — which have brought us to a state
of great confusion so far — I'd have to publish a 2000 page book with
hundreds of pages of citations, to cut through this Gordian knot. I
would be expected to conduct and win separate isolated debates against
researchers of determinism, Christian origins and historicity,
entheogen history, personal control in cognitive psychology, and myth.
Such is the giant mountain of confusion and the monolithic
many-controversied solutions to it.

What could one possibly hope for, to have everyone cite a 10,000 word
article that has a handful of citations? The article was deliberately
kept ultra-short while packing into it a monolithic system of as many
radical controversial positions as possible, playing the entire field
so as to prevent any controversial natural component from escaping the
paradigmatic network of relationships.

Since my 1988 first draft of the article, I've always had a clear
vision of a short article that changes the entire world of religious
thinking, but only a blurry and hazy mental picture of a book. In
this sense, the theory, in itself, is not a book; it truly is an
article (albeit, an article that spills out into book length). I've
always thought that the theory is no good, a failure, unless it is
condensed, in its primary embodiment, as a short article — because a
good theory ought to *simplify*. This expresses my ideal for
knowledge, for explanatory power, and for communication. The world
has too many mediocre books, with too many citations of other mediocre
books, and too few concise, actual explanations and solutions that in
fact bring clarity and actually make sense, unlike the currently
predominant views that are a set of discomforts everyone has become
comfortable with through sheer familiarity and repetition.

I'm all for an ego death book with many, conventional citations to
forcefully coerce people to adopt all sorts of positions they are
biased against, but my vision focuses more readily on an article with
few citations, and a far more take-it-or-leave-it presentation of the
entire paradigm *as a whole, monolithic, integrated system — *not* as
isolated proofs of each controversial position segregated into
isolated ghettos. I refuse to discuss *only* the no-historical-Paul
subject, without also discussing the history of determinism and the
maximal entheogen theory, and the rationality of mystic experiential
insight, and the logic of rational control-destabilization and
transrational recovery. But the existing framework of scholarly
theories is not compatible with such a multi-controversy framework.

A more compelling reason to put forth a book is so that
already-interested people have something to purchase, *not* to
convince doubters or get weak-kneed academics to cite the
controversy-set.

________________
Jan. 3, 2006:

I'm starting to pinpoint an inherent challenge I'm facing now in
communicating the theory of transcendent experiential knowledge.

An opportunity has been open for such a new theory of religion,
because no one in modernity until now has thought to bring together
these 4 topics I abbreviate as 'dissociation, determinism,
cybernetics, metaphor'. But by the same token, the accompanying
challenge is, when these ideas *are* finally brought together by the
first theorist to do so (me), the existing world's initial reaction
isn't "That all fits together to explain everything I've been
wondering" so much as "That's odd, arbitrarily combining these 4
separate topics. I'm greatly interested in one of these 4 topics, and
somewhat interested one of the others, but I'm not interested in all 4
of these widely separate topics, and certainly not interested in the
integrated combination of these 4 topics."

Basically I need to avoid alienating people due to one of my emphases.
I provide something for everyone to dislike or be alienated about.

When I emphasize Dissociation or entheogens, many people are alienated
and stop reading.
When I emphasize Determinism, many people are alienated and stop
reading.
When I emphasize transcending Determinism, many people are alienated
and stop reading.
When I emphasize self-control cybernetics, many people are alienated
and stop reading.
When I emphasize metaphor and myth, many people are alienated and stop
reading.

When I emphasize the strictly metaphorical and allegorical origins of
Christianity (Judaism, Buddhism, Islam), many people are alienated and
stop reading.

From one point of view, it's an attractive, appealing theory because
it draws so much together. But the reverse side of that coin is, the
more you draw together, the more you risk alienating many people due
to your stance on one of the many topics covered. In the case of
Determinism, in the other discussion group, at least one person was
infinitely narrow: he didn't really read anything I wrote, because he
is alienated from entheogens, alienated from transcending determinism,
and alienated from the pre-modern 'Heimarmene' conception of
Determinism. Anything other than that person's narrowly informed view
or stance, gets ignored.

There wasn't nearly enough room in my 10,000 word article to
explicitly explain, much, why people ought to be interested in these 4
ideas. It was somewhat a bummer to find that one person helping
prepare the paper seemed to be completely uninterested in the history
of these subjects, and uninterested in drug policy reform in the
future — the person was only narrowly interested in enlightenment now
(in what I'd call the conceptual framework of the late modern era).

Similarly, there are evidently many links to my individual website
pages, but practically no links to my home page, indicating that no
one is interested in the theory — the combination of the 4+ areas of
emphasis I bring together — only in an isolated subset, 1.5 topics
within the theory. I don't have to work to generate interest in the
isolated topic of determinism, or the isolated topic of entheogens —
those single-topic audiences already exist. My unique challenge is
that I have to work to generate interest in the combination of these
4+ topics, *as a set*. In effect, I have to say:

Forget the subject of "entheogens"! [as a lone, isolated subject of
interest]
Forget the subject of "determinism vs. freewill"!
Forget the subject of "self-control struggles"!
Forget the subject of "mythology"!
Forget the subject of "the Historicity of Jesus"!

Everyone instead ought to be interested in the new subject of
"entheogens+determinism+self-control-cybernetics+myth+historicity-in-C
hristianity"!

It takes a huge leap of faith on my part not that this combination is
right — it solves the puzzles thus is essentially right — but
rather, it takes a huge leap of faith on my part that communicating
this combination of ideas will be successful, due to current lack of
interest. My challenge is to generate interest, create my own
audience, by starting with isolated audiences who are separately
interested in one of the subjects I combine, and ending up with an
audience that is together interested in this entire *combination* of
subjects. I treat each of these existing topics in a distinctive way
in that I integrate that topic with the other main topics I cover.

There are at least a few people who are interested in the whole
integrated combination of these ideas, showing there is some hope for
generating an audience that is greater than the "cult following" of
the 4+ areas, combined. If a million people are interested in
Determinism as an isolated topic, and a million in Entheogens, a
million in myth, and a million in self-control issues, and a million
in Jesus' historicity, my goal and challenge is not merely to sum
those existing specialty audiences, but surpass that with a new
audience of many millions, who are specifically interested in the
integrated combination of these 4+ topics.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: egodeath Message: 4495 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 23/01/2006
Subject: Re: Controversy, shunning, un-citeability, mega paradigm shift, opp
________________________

Two Different Conceptions of 'Determinism'

Clarification:
>>o Sequential determinism is an unwarranted view.

That the future is unchangeable and pre-set *because of causal-chain
determinism* is a weak and shaky view.

The usual reasoning is: "1. Experience and simple observation shows
that the state of things at one point in time causes the state at the
next point in time. 2: Therefore, as an incidental byproduct, by
roundabout implication, we should speculate that the future is
unchangeable." The mystic altered state reveals that the future is
unchangeable, but not "because of causal-chain determinism".

The reasoning proceeds in reverse, from the mystic altered state:
first, experience and simple observation and sensation in the mystic
altered state show that the future is unchangeable; secondly, one may
speculate that this situation suggests causal-chain determinism.

It's a difference of emphasis and idea-connections. The mystic
doesn't experience the sensation or observation of "causal-chain
determinism", but rather, the experience of inability to originate
thoughts. Observation in the dissociative state shows the experience
of timelessness, of non-motion, and of agency powerlessness, not the
experience of causal linkage from one moment to the next. The
dissociative state causes, in roundabout fashion, thinking about
causal linkage over time, but doesn't give a direct sensation of
causal linkage over time.

________________________

Modernity = Lack of ASC

Clarification:
>>Who is positioned to evaluate my overthrow of Jung and Campbell and
the entire academic establishment regarding Christian origins …

Campbell has a mainly correct understanding of Christian origins, in
that Christianity is exclusively mythic, not historical, such as in
his book Thou Art That: Transforming Religious Metaphor,
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1577312023/ . I'm
against the mid-20th Century Jung and Campbell theory that myth is
about "the unconscious", dreams, and mental dynamics or psychological
developmental adventures in the OSC. Actually, myth is, first and
foremost, metaphorical description of entheogen-induced experiential
insights.

It's puzzling why Campbell wrote so little about the ASC — but his
ignoring of entheogens was typical, normal, and characteristic of the
modern era. Part of the problem is that modernity typically isolates
fields that are actually interrelated, *because* the ASC is not
integrated into modern culture. When the ASC is integrated into
culture, the various fields come closer together: science, religion,
myth, mysticism, philosophy, psychology. Modern culture is what
results from not integrating the ASC into official dominant culture
but instead relegating the ASC to the (relative) underground of
Theosophy, art, pop music, and radical culture.


Regarding Earl Doherty's leading-edge work on ahistoricity of Jesus
and the mythical esoteric initiatory nature of Christianity — albeit
"rationalist" and "atheist" and "scientific" to a fault, uninformed by
and ignorant of the data from the altered state — see the recent book
reviews, reader feedback, and debate threads at his site.
http://pages.ca.inter.net/~oblio/whatsnew.htm

To religious scholars I say, ignorance of the altered state is not
"the scientific historical method"!

To modern determinists I say, ignorance of the history of determinism
is not "rational philosophy"!

If you *actually* give a damn about rational philosophy and science,
get a clue and learn something about the altered state and the rich
history of the idea of determinism, instead of the most anti-science
attitude and irrational non-philosophy which the Net Know-nothings
advocate when they say "the altered state = confusion and
irrationality" and "Why should I bother studying what religious people
in the dark ages prior to today thought about determinism?" Ignorance
is not "Science"! Such pompous ignorance is vulgar scientism.


_______________________

Discovering One's Threatening Vulnerability to Thought-Coercion

Clarification:
>>where are the peers who each are qualified to judge on … the
details of rationality-based harmful loss of control and
thought-coercion

… the details of rationality-based realization of the threat of
vulnerability to harmful loss of control and thought-coercion due to
the pre-set givenness of thoughts
Group: egodeath Message: 4496 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/04/2006
Subject: Article: The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
http://www.egodeath.com/EntheogenTheoryOfReligion.htm — properly
formatted copy


The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
by Michael S. Hoffman
April 24, 2006 draft
Salvia Divinorum, Issue 4

Contents

The Entheogen Theory of Religion:
Origins of Christianity in Entheogenic Initiation
Sociopolitical Strategy of Canonical Christianity
Altered State Integrated into Ancient Culture
Modernity a Single-State Culture
Freedom for Higher-Order Religion
Role of Democracy for Ecstatic Danger
Initiation as Natural Developmental Sequence
The Entheogenic Future of Religion

The Dissociative Cognitive State:
Restructuring Enabled by Loose Association Binding
Splitting of Representation and Referent Layers
The Moving Control-Agent as Mental Construct
Religious Effects of Salvia Divinorum
Myth Describes Dissociative Phenomena

The Block Universe and Frozen Worldlines:
Time as a Space-like Dimension
Physical Fastening of All Thoughts and Actions
Fixed Worldlines of Subjective Experiencing
Religion as Accommodation to Everything Being Pre-set
Vertical, Timeless Determinism
Two Jumps to Transcend Determinism
Fatedness and Control in Astral Ascent Mysticism

Self-Control and the Hidden Source of Thoughts:
The Goal of Understanding Ego Death
Deliberately Postulating Coming Control-Loss
The Control Breakdown Potential as a Problem
Transcendent Solution to Restoring Viable Control
Sin as Misattribution of Control-Thoughts
Wrath, Compassion, and Making Peace
Sacrificing to End Battling the Thought-Source
Vertical Atonement for Rebellion-Guilt
The Sacred Marriage

Bibliography

________________________________________

The Entheogen Theory of Religion

The entheogen theory of religion holds that the main origin and
ongoing wellspring of religion is visionary plants, such as Psilocybe
mushrooms, Peyote, Ayahuasca combinations, Cannabis, Opium, Henbane,
Datura, Mandrake, Belladonna, ergot, and Amanita mushrooms.
Visionary plants have been commonly used around the world throughout
the history of religion and culture (Hofmann, Schultes, & Ratsch
1992), including in the various forms of Western Esotericism (Heinrich
1994). Greek and Christian mythic-religious systems often refer to
visionary plants (Ruck, Staples, & Heinrich 2001). Leading mystics
throughout the history of various religions have used on-demand,
visionary-plant sessions with rationality-oriented mystic-state
experiencing (Merkur 2001).
Meditation, shamanic drumming, and liturgical ritual were developed as
activities to do in the plant-induced dissociative state, not as
methods of inducing the dissociative state in the first place.

Origins of Christianity in Entheogenic Initiation

The extent of entheogen use throughout Christian history has barely
been considered yet (Hoffman 2006). Early Christianity involved
mystical, religious, visionary experiencing, including the experience
of the transformative, transcendent power of the Holy Spirit at
Eucharistic agape meals (Johnson 1998). Early Christian writings show
familiarity with ecstatic mania, inspiration, elevated sobriety, and
"drunkenness" (Nasrallah 2003).
The Jesus figure is portrayed in the New Testament as a
spirit-possessed altered-state shamanistic healer (Davies 1995). The
figure of Paul the Apostle is portrayed as a shamanistic mystic
(Ashton 2000), and the apostles are portrayed as adepts in shamanic
altered-state mystic experiencing (Pilch 2004).
Solving the riddle of the original mystic-metaphorical meaning of
Christianity requires also understanding the surrounding metaphorical
altered-state initiation systems throughout Christian history,
including Roman religion, Neoplatonism, Western Esotericism, and
astral ascent mysticism.
The large window of the Legend of Eustace in Chartres cathedral shows
many 'mushroom trees', including clear depictions of mushrooms;
hundreds of depictions of mushrooms appear in Christian art (fig. 1).

Sociopolitical Strategy of Canonical Christianity

The New Testament editors utilized the era's standard mastery of
mystic-state metaphor and the altered-state experience of communal
unity to direct the Jewish mystic-metaphor system into the figure of
Jesus, profitably sweeping together the various quasi-Christian
groups. They claimed themselves to have been appointed as the
administrators of the Eucharistic gatherings by Jesus, who they
portrayed as having been around just long enough to commission them
exclusively with all authority.
Jesus and all the apostles were entirely and strictly mythic (Doherty
1999, Drews 1924). The figure of Paul served as a controverted
authorial token (Detering 1995). The authors and redactors of the
writings attributed to Paul don't mention any biographical information
about the life of Jesus because the gospel story was a later, literary
creation, based on many sources, including Roman imperial ruler cult,
Josephus' writings, and Hellenistic literature.
Mystic revelation about self-will nullity was so routine, Roman
imperial theology utilized the mystic-state revelation to legitimate
the Roman sociopolitical arrangement. Christianity essentially charged
the Roman system with mysticism-abuse and became popular as an
counter-narrative about how the entheogen-accessed mystic revelation
should be used for sociopolitical concerns.

Altered State Integrated into Ancient Culture

The entheogenic altered state was integrated into culture, using
metaphor to map all domains together, including banquets and parties,
games, civic procession to a sacrificial altar, punishment, release of
captives, sport, taxation, alliances, and war.
A common standard "banqueting tradition" practice with reclining at
table while drinking 'mixed wine' ran across many seemingly disparate
cultural practices throughout antiquity (Smith 2003). 'Mixed wine' was
the central, reliable means of accessing the intense mystic altered
state throughout antiquity. Ancient 'mixed wine' specifically meant
visionary-plant mixtures (Ruck 1978), such as Psilocybe mushroom wine.
If Electric Kool-Aid in an Acid Test type of gathering were switched
with 'mixed wine' in a Hellenistic symposium, neither party would
notice much difference.
Socrates' initiation of elite youths outside official democratic
channels carried political implications and risks, because ancient
politics and religion were deliberately interlinked by mystic-state
experiencing.

Modernity a Single-State Culture

The adept use and comprehension of metaphor faded after the battle
between politicized Christianity and Scientism around 1700, leaving a
long-term standoff between mystically neutered religious literalism
versus exclusively ordinary-state-based Science. The culturally
predominant type of religion in the modern era neutralized and reduced
the traditional initiation system by a combination of
non-transformative surface ritual and intellectual speculation based
only in the ordinary cognitive state.
The modern cultural experience resulted from the predominance of the
ordinary cognitive state. The lack of culturally integrated
altered-state initiation caused the egoic mental world-model, based in
only a single cognitive state, to become completely predominant.
Authentic initiation is widely present in modern culture, including
art, literature, religion, and popular culture, but is not integrated
into the official culture; for example, the song "Help!" written by
John Lennon, the album Ride the Lightning by Metallica, and the Matrix
movie series.

Freedom for Higher-Order Religion

Lower-order religion is derivative, limited to mundane conduct-of-life
doctrine suited for the ordinary state of consciousness; the
higher-order version of each religion is primary and is concerned with
dissociative-state phenomena, particularly the ecstatic transformation
of personal control-agency concepts, resulting in re-attribution of
the origin of one's will and thoughts.
The drug schedules and the involved worldview are out of touch with
religion. Laws against psychoactives amount to blanket laws against
primary religious experiencing; such laws stand in the way of the
religious revelation about control-system limits and dependence on the
transcendent. The ever-expanding drug schedules directly conflict with
the only kind of religious freedom that amounts to specifically
religious freedom; that is, freedom to regularly and ergonomically
access primary religious experiencing. The system of schedules is not
from God, but is an invention that ignores the central role of
visionary plants in religion, multi-state cognitive psychology, and
the innate human drive to self-transcendence.
The essence of religious freedom is specifically the freedom to
reliably access mystic-state consciousness, as in early, house-church
Eucharistic agape meals, the ancient banqueting tradition, and the
mystery religions, all of which utilized psychoactive plants as their
central sacrament. As long as modern culture forbids itself the true,
ergonomic Eucharist, legislating against the entheogen-based ecstatic
heart of religion, religious freedom is restricted to selecting among
various brands of lower-order religion; higher-order religion is
effectively outlawed and placed off-limits, out of reach.
The spiritual essence of religion is precisely the testing and
culmination of autonomous personal control-agency through consuming
the entheogenic sacrament; suppressing entheogens because of their
danger is inherently an illegalization of authentic religion, and
amounts to obstructing the only religious freedom that is meaningful
in a specifically religious sense.

Role of Democracy for Ecstatic Danger

The proper role for representative democracy regarding drugs is to
work out how visionary plants and psychoactive substances are to be
healthily integrated into American culture, making dissociative-state
religious initiation as ergonomic and as safe as possible. Drugs are
not a problem to be eliminated and suppressed, but a means of maturing
to be channeled.
The Supreme Court of the United States has recognized the legitimacy
of Peyote and Ayahuasca in worship; these plants have the same effects
as LSD and Psilocybe mushrooms, including causing the person's power
of will and power of self-control to become seized, then restored in a
religiously transformed configuration.
The threat of the encounter with the power of the divine is the threat
of loss of control of one's thoughts when studying self-knowledge in
the ecstatic state. This inherent danger of entheogens, a danger
inherent in the encounter with the power that transcends our personal
control of our will, is mitigated by having a systematic theory about
the nature of self-control agency, in conjunction with mastering the
skilled use of entheogens and understanding how past cultures have
accommodated this necessary danger which is the gateway to mature
religious knowledge.

Initiation as Natural Developmental Sequence

Greek and non-modern cultures integrated an altered-state-based series
of initiations. Initiation classically combines a series of
visionary-plant sessions with learning perennial philosophy, followed
by subsequent religiously integrated dissociation such as symposium
"drinking-party" associations, festival banquets, and Eucharistic
agape meals, all of which used visionary-plant mixtures.
Entheogenic religious initiation was a prerequisite for symposium
banqueting, so that participants were experienced. The banqueting
tradition including symposium "drinking parties" included prayer and
sacrifices; social recreation and religious experiencing were not
opposed activities.
The intention of a recreational or other non-religious user of
entheogens is commonly overcome by the inherently entheogenic nature
of the visionary plants, including revealing how personal control
depends on a source of thoughts outside one's domain of control – a
realization which is the gateway to religion. Young adults naturally
seek initiatory transformation; the modern culture of Prohibition
demands that they suppress this drive and permanently stunt their
growth, settling into the non-initiate's mindset for life, foregoing
enlightenment and religious revelation.

The Entheogenic Future of Religion

Ergonomic tools such as systematized theory and controllable
entheogens in post-modernity will make the mystic state common
knowledge again, but more explicitly and systematically than in
antiquity. Salvia divinorum makes the dissociative-state experience
accessible, practical, and ergonomic. With the systematic ego death
theory in hand, there is no need for heroic doses of psychoactives;
moderate dosage is most effective.
New, culturally intelligible metaphor-systems will result from
culturally integrated agency-transformative entheogen use, including
self-control cybernetics.
The religio-political philosophy in the spirit of the U.S.A. is to
accept entheogens, accept culturally supported self-control seizure,
accept the transcendent as the ultimate ruler or governor, but reject
all earthly systems of government as being divinely authorized or
approved.
Drug plants will be revived as the authentic vehicle for the mystic
state in communal religion, because they are immediately available to
all people and fully ergonomic. Christianity will reawaken to its
original idea of applying altered-state-based mental worldmodel
transformation (about time, self, and control) and
experiential-insight revelation toward providing an alternate
sociopolitical idea, configuration, or counter-narrative to all
attempts to abuse mystic-state revelation by utilizing mysticism to
prop up worldly systems of sociopolitical governments claiming to be
divinely mandated.
Group: egodeath Message: 4497 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/04/2006
Subject: Re: Article: The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
The Dissociative Cognitive State

Mental constructs are dynamic association matrixes of mental
representations, held together by some degree of binding intensity.
Ordinary-state cognition is settled and immersed in the standard egoic
ruts of patterns and mental associations, such as trying to improvise
on a musical instrument but ending up playing uninspired repetitive
patterns. Entheogens cause their various phenomenological effects by
loosening cognitive associations, causing mental construct processing
to be revealed as artificial representationalism and projection.
Ecstatic maenads mix visionary plants into wine in a wine-mixing bowl
before a column and mask representing Dionysus and the timeless frozen
block-universe behind the mask of one's pseudo-autonomous
control-agency (fig. 2).

Restructuring Enabled by Loose Association Binding

The dissociative cognitive state loosens the associative binding,
enabling deep revision of the interconnections between mental
constructs. In robust, primary religious experiencing, the mental
model of self and world undergoes a standard, pre-configured expansion
and transformation to take into account the representational nature of
experience, the experience of embeddedness in timeless unity, and the
limited and dependent nature of self-control agency, assisted by
metaphors describing the experiential insights.
Like egoic cognitive structures, the transcendent mental model is an
innate, pre-configured structure that is discovered and revealed, like
the adolescent discovers the innate ability to climax, then is
developed and refined, rather than being invented and constructed as
though an arbitrary invention. The ability to mystically climax is
inbuilt, as is the mental model that is revealed, although the useful
metaphors and systematic explanation necessary to retain the revealed
mental structure must be a product of human effort.
Revolutionary conversion to a new theory or world-model involves
structural transformation of concept networks and hierarchies,
increased explanatory coherence, concept recombination, and rational
mechanisms of paradigm conversion (Thagard 1992).
Having a recognizable personality relies on such habitual patterns of
dynamic mental construct associations, which are dynamic within a
particular range or mode; behind their mask of habit-based,
pseudo-separate agency, everyone is Dionysus (the ultimate
control-source).

Splitting of Representation and Referent Layers

Salvia divinorum causes metaperception, which is the tangible
perception of the layer of mental constructs that is the only thing
directly presented to awareness. In the dissociative state, the
vantage-point of awareness is raised, or stepped back a level,
resulting in perceiving the cognitive workings of mental-construct
processing and perception itself (Hoffman 1996).
Not only do associated mental constructs become separate from each
other, the mental representation of each item perceptibly splits and
separates from the represented referent, splitting into two
perceptibly distinct layers: the representation layer present like a
tangible painting, and a remote, speculative realm that is pointed to
but perceptually absent, like a foreign country one has never directly
seen.
A person lives their entire subjectively experienced life inside a
brain-computer simulation that their own mind produces by presenting
mental constructs to awareness. In metaperception, personal
control-power and personal movement through space and time appear as
what they are, synthetic mental constructs.

The Moving Control-Agent as Mental Construct

The mind in the ordinary cognitive state generates the sensation of
being an autonomous egoic agent wielding cross-time control-power
while moving through time and space; this sensation is a projected,
constructed, synthetic image and perspective.
The ego-entity exists as a real set of patterns and dynamics spread
across time, but the ego is not solid, continuous, or autonomously
powerful in the manner initially conceived. As a mental construct, the
self exists as a time-slice series: both as the entire series and as
individual time-slices, with the continuant agent's motion and
control-power mentally projected from within each time-slice.
Seeing the illusory aspects of mental representation of oneself, and
feeling static spacetime unity in the absence of the accustomed sense
of personal solidity, can be experienced as death – the ending of
personal existence – because the egoic-mode mind strongly identifies
with the projected image and sensation of the moving continuant agent
and its control-power.

Religious Effects of Salvia Divinorum

Salvia divinorum is an ergonomic vehicle of religious revelation and
transformative, initiatory mental-model regeneration. The reduction of
bodily effects, along with controllable dosage and short duration,
makes Salvia ideal for studying cognitive dynamics about time, will,
and control, including the nature of personal control agency. When
Salvia is combined with understanding the present theory, one can be
immediately and straightforwardly initiated into transcendent
self-knowledge.
Salvia produces fewer bodily effects than LSD; it lacks the trembling,
pupil dilation, temperature swing, and heart palpitation.
Salvia can cause intense undulation of vision and of the mental
body-image similar to the seer and priest of Apollo, Laokoon, wrapped
by and wrestling with the two serpents of Apollo; the currents, waves,
and breakers swirling about Jonah, threatened by the engulfing waters,
with seaweed wrapped around his head; and the snakes moving around
Medusa's head. The material plane itself seems to undulate, as well as
the mental body-image, not just one's visual perception of it.
Compared to acid and mushrooms, Salvia has a distinctively narrower,
signature range of effects and religious tenor. With Salvia,
dissociative processing is less distracted by superficial perceptual
effects of visual and auditory distortion such as color smearing,
blurring, surface waving, bending, or tracers, and audio warbling.
Salvia is more exclusively focused on provoking sensations of explicit
representationalism, timeless frozenness, spacetime embeddedness and
spatial merging, thought-coercion, and the sensation of inability to
control and steer away from one's near-future thoughts.
The shorter duration of smoked Salvia means the dynamics such as
"voyage", "long trip that plays out", and "epic journey" are reduced
compared to peyote or LSD; however, the same peak theme still occurs,
"there's no turning away from any control-crash that might be sitting
up ahead on the worldline". The duration of smoked Salvia is too brief
to enable transcendent, dissociative-state emotion.

Myth Describes Dissociative Phenomena

Myth is metaphorical description of the intense mystic-state
experiencing that results from visionary plants. Myth reflects
dissociative phenomenology or dissociative-state experiencing, not
ordinary-state experiencing.
Visionary-plant states and otherworldly themes form the tradition of
altered-state journeying (Culiano 1991). Many thematic categories of
metaphorical descriptions have been used throughout history to
describe dissociative-state sensations and experiences (Metzner 1986).
Metaphoricity is a prime characteristic of the entheogenic,
dissociative cognitive state (Shanon 2002).
The hunter Actaeon saw the goddess Artemis bathing naked, so she
turned him into an animal, and his own hunting dogs tore him to
pieces. The Actaeon hunting myth comprises the dissociative-state
themes of seeing divinity (the higher or ultimate control-level),
transgression of control-limits, transformation of oneself, mental
searching, dissociative fragmentation of the mental body-image, and
the death of the initial self-conception.
Triptolemus is shown as a charioteer or steersman in a
Heimarmene-snake-drawn, winged chariot, with a large cup of
psychoactive mixed wine given to him by the goddess Demeter or
Persephone (fig. 7).
Group: egodeath Message: 4498 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/04/2006
Subject: Re: Article: The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
Self-Control and the Hidden Source of Thoughts

The ego is the sense of being a metaphysically free, sovereign agent
that originates and controls one's thoughts, actions, and movements of
the will while moving through time and space.
Ego death is the cessation, in the intense mystic altered state, of
the sense and feeling of being a control-wielding agent moving through
time, and the replacement of that sensation by the experience of being
helplessly, powerlessly embedded in spacetime as purely a product of
spacetime, with control-thoughts being perceptibly inserted or set
into the stream of thought by a hidden uncontrollable source that's in
a position of ultimate control.

The Goal of Understanding Ego Death

Ego death leaves one's initial, youthful "lie" behind – the confused
mental worldmodel that assumes oneself is the ultimate creator of
one's thoughts, actions, future, and movement of will. The goal of
testing control in the altered state is not externally destructive
loss of control, but rather, fundamental self-knowledge and correction
of error and confusion: understanding the nature and limits of control
across time by exploring ideas of loss of control and transcendent
restabilization of control.
The promise of increased power over oneself leads to realizing the
logical impossibility of that mode of power, but produces instead a
viable alternate conception, of secondary-level, reflected power,
along with transcendent knowledge and the relieving cessation of the
vexing labor of attempting to gain self-control while holding a
confused model of self-control due to the misleading sensation of the
time-voyaging continuant agent being the originator of the power of
will; that particular dissonance is ended.
In Gnosticism, the completed initiate belongs to the Immovable Race
and is able to stand stably in the face of overwhelming,
autonomy-undermining controllership emanating from the hidden,
uncontrollable, primary control-level.
The initiated mind creatively integrates insights about the
limitations of personal control-power in a feasible way that results
in unharmed survival and the increased ability to survive under a
broader range of experiential modes. A personal control system is
divinely approved or transcendence-compatible in that it repudiates
the claim to be able to depend on itself to save itself during a
control-crash, and affirms that any soundness it has comes from
outside its system boundary, not from within its local internal
resources of power and ability.

Deliberately Postulating Coming Control-Loss

The religious path and method is to ingest entheogens; think about
your control-power; almost lose control; depend on transcendent power,
rather than your own power, to save your self-control; this transforms
your ideas about self and control to conform to transcendent
experiential dynamics, "conforming to the image of God". The efficient
method of enlightenment about the dynamics of control-agency is to
test self-control-power by deliberately supposing that loss-of-control
is lying fated on the worldline ahead, and then struggling to use
one's personal control-power to avoid that potentially given
control-loss event, while in the dissociative state – experiencing
this basic and fundamental idea is a useful point of reference for
thinking about religious questions.
The ability of the immediate self to violate the accustomed desires or
will of the overall cross-time self, including overriding the
accustomed self-preservation restraints, disproves the impression that
the time-voyaging continuant control-agent ever was in control as the
originator of personal thoughts, and reveals that the true origin of
the movements of the will the whole time was a hidden transcendent
source other than the self conceived of as a time-voyaging continuant
control-agent.
Religious revelation is of our cybernetic control-seizure potential
and the real source of control-power, rather than oneself conceived of
in the egoic way. Deliberately thinking about being helplessly,
inevitably, and irresistibly drawn into the thought of near-future
loss of control is a way of being drawn up into heaven by God on
Elijah's whirlwind or fire-chariot.

The Control Breakdown Potential as a Problem

Ever-tighter, more forceful application of rationality that's premised
on the assumption of wielding control-power across time cannot save
the control-system from seizure. Oneself as pure logic-based
control-system has run out of resources, come to the end of its rope,
and only created an impossible mess, gotten itself tangled up,
paralyzed in its own net of reasoning about control, power, and will.

Relying on one's conventional power of control-logic and will, when
fully developed, "perfected" (such as it is), and hatched, has proven
to lead inevitably to self-control seizure, fatal error, lock-up,
system hang, operating system crash, perfect self-cancellation of
personal control power, producing fearsome chaos, insanity and
self-destruction that's the product of demonic reason taken to its
full development.
The clear need to examine our control-power and confront our dependent
puppet-like status eventually leads to distress, anxiety, panic
attack, or self-control seizure, together with amazement that such
mental dynamics are possible and that one's role as the creator and
controller of one's thoughts was an illusion. The current time-slice
self or time-voyaging continuant self is helpless to control or
restrain the future time-slice selves in the mystic peak window, while
playing with the idea of having, keeping, or losing control; the
result is like an army of lookalike time-slice selves, fighting
against each other.
King Pentheus resisted Dionysus, the intruding foreign ruler coming in
from outside the kingdom, a mad divine power undermining the ruling
power of the local ruler; then king Pentheus was tricked into
participating in an ecstatic-state excursion, was lifted and caught up
helplessly in a tree, and was defeated and torn to pieces by his
mother and other raving Dionysus worshippers.
To be an idol worshipper, or vanity, is to assume that the power of
egoic control agency is real and substantial, and to depend on that
doomed pseudo-power configuration to save oneself from the
catastrophic failure of cybernetic self-control, which is inherently,
systemically entailed. The ability to make self-control seize is an
afflicting thorn (2 Cor. 12:7-10), hole, or wound in our side, the
self-control seizure, the innate cybernetic governance-failure through
which the new, transformed life is born. The new transcendence-aware
self is given birth through the hole in the ego's side, representing
our potential for self-control seizure.
After drinking mixed wine at the Last Supper, in the garden of
Gethsemane just prior to the court trial, Jesus began to be
distressed, amazed, agitated, and fearful, saying like an initiate as
though of a necessary poisoning of the lower self, "Father, remove
this cup from me; yet not what I will, but what Thou wilt." The mind's
local control-agency becomes distressed and apprehensive about whether
and how it can retain control, upon turning attention around,
perceptibly recognizing its vulnerability to thought-coercion and
control-instability, and seeing the illusory aspect of personal
autonomous power.
Julius Caesar was considered authorized for power by his seizures, and
the bull in his military's Mithraic mystery-cult was seizure-wounded
in the side, so the figure of Jesus was shown as similarly authorized
by the spear-wound in his side, and the figure of the apostle Paul was
portrayed as suffering from seizures.

Transcendent Solution to Restoring Viable Control

A different kind of approach and solution is required, to restore
order, from chaos of such kind of self-dependence and self-reliance.
Something that transcends personal control-power logic is needed to
provide an alternative to the seized, useless logical scheme of egoic
control power. After being shown this cybernetically fatal threat, a
rescuing miracle of transcendent magic arrives from outside the system
of egoic control-power logic. Rescue and solving the problem of
control lock-up can only come through a transcendent Zen jump outside
of depending on that system of reasoning with its self-seizing
premises.
Buddha recognized that it was his destiny to touch the ground in an
act of resolute commitment to compassion and harmonious integration
with the unity of the Ground of Being, causing Mara and his army of
demons to instantly disperse – then he experienced enlightenment.
The mind's transcendent potential kicks in, realizing that the pure
logic of control-agency power cannot be the solution to the very
problem that such logic generated in the first place; one must put
one's reliance on a self-existing faith, compassion, heart, love,
benevolent Holy Spirit, that cannot have any ordinary rational
control-logic basis and that one does not experience as a product of
one's own egoic control-power or will, but is consciously experienced
as being given by the hidden source of thoughts and movements of the
will.
The figure of Caesar was plugged into the routinized mystery-cult
format utilizing 'mixed wine'; these imperial-government themed
mystery cults had initiation rites for mystai using 'mixed wine'
heavily, along with symposium drinking parties (Pleket 1965), and
incorporated themes of control-power seizure and restoration of
personal government.
The way to restoration of stable, practical control is through the
recognition that personal control depends instead on transcendent
givenness of your thoughts by a mysterious hidden source that
ultimately caused the control lock-up, independently saving your
controllership – personified as a merciful and compassionate God. Our
control-power has the Judas capability – the ability to betray the
illusory position of power, through divine, transcendent
power-seizure, and thereby deliver our lower, "rebellious" claim of
independent kingship-power over to the transcendent level of governing
power. Lazarus is transcendently lifted up from ego-death
control-power paralysis by Jesus as the representative of the
separate, higher-level source of thoughts (fig. 8).
Maria Ska Pastora as benevolent and trustworthy thought-provider
rescues the person from the direly threatening wolf, which is the
threat of loss of control or hostile control-usurpation by the hidden
thought-source (fig. 9). After transcendently being moved out from the
doomed system of personal-driven control-logic, one experiences the
joyful sense of relief and thankfulness of having been rescued from
certain peril from outside the resources one wields as a local locus
of control, a time-voyaging continuant control-agent.

Sin as Misattribution of Control-Thoughts

Upon peak initiation, the concept of 'sin' is reinterpreted and
revised, producing a transformed mental model which understands 'sin'
to be a logical error about the nature of control-agency and
agent-culpability. Sin is a matter of understanding and meaning-shift.
The secret of the kingdom of God has been given, but cloaked in
double-meanings so that those on the outside may see and hear but not
understand, lest they turn about and their sins be forgiven (Mark
4:12).
In mystic metaphor, misunderstanding moral agency is considered the
fundamental sin and immorality; God was most angry about the king's
rebellious worship of idols that are fashioned out of created
materials – a metaphor for taking pseudo-autonomous personal
control-agency as though it were genuinely autonomous.
Reformed theology affirms the predestination of who God gives salvific
grace to, while holding to the moral culpability of created persons –
this Augustinian compound model is a bi-modal, metaphorical
meaning-shifting technique, rather than a simply inconsistent
combination of beliefs.
A person's will appears to be originated and controlled by the
time-voyaging continuant agent that's projected out from each
time-slice along the person's timelessly frozen worldline; the
conception of personal control agency that is built around this
illusion is 'sin' and the 'lie'.

Wrath, Compassion, and Making Peace

'Wrath' means the threat that Fate or blind, machine-like determinism
is ultimately in control of your coming thoughts but is set against
your claim to exert independent power over your thoughts.
Mystic-state 'compassion' and 'rescue that narrowly averts divine
wrath' means that that which ultimately gives you your thoughts is
intimately united with you and is good or benevolent toward you,
bringing you into a harmonious, reconciled, integrated relationship
with the compassionate and beneficent controller of all that happens,
including your own near-future thoughts.
The wrath/compassion polarity is portrayed as paired deities of wrath
and compassion in Tibetan Buddhism; dual traits of the Creator; and
Jesus as harsh righteous judge with Mary as compassionate intercessor.
The god of battling and the goddess of love – Ares and Aphrodite (Mars
and Venus) – were caught together in a near-invisible net, producing
the child Harmonia (Concordia).
Jupiter Optimus Maximus means all-good and all-powerful, as is hoped
for from a protective deity when one is vulnerable to awareness of
Heimarmene in the intense mystic altered state.

Sacrificing to End Battling the Thought-Source

Sacrifice is a demonstration of cooperative dependence on that which
gives thoughts, your will having been overcome and made to will its
own demise as an empty delusion, turned against itself by now-revealed
transcendent power, offering up and handing over your claim to
effective independent power and repudiating your former resistance to
its power over you, as opposed to battling against that overpowering
(and undermining) source of all thoughts and movements of will.
Emphatically sacrificing your autonomy-claim, acknowledging your
fundamental situation of dependency on that which ultimately gives you
your thoughts, brings mental peace and harmony, and calms turmoil,
because as long as you persist in claiming independent self-sustained
autonomy and secure control, you have to prove your autonomy and
control by testing the power of your autonomy and the limits of your
self-control thoughts.
Roman sacrificial altars are typically shown with a libation of
concentrated, psychoactive unmixed wine being poured on the altar,
which would open up a channel to the gods, along with the sacrificial
animal such as the unresisting, cooperative bull. The sacrificer
pouring the libation has a cloth behind the head, representing the
spiritual ecstatic state.
The god Mithras wields and controls the bull's shoulder, representing
one's pseudo-autonomous power of self-command, personal will, or
lower-level control-power. Sacrificing the bull represents
control-power seizing and being given over to the gods, with Mithras'
arm wielding the bull's shoulder and his knife piercing and fatally
wounding it; the seizure-wound in the side indicates Mithras
demonstrating his power over the bull's control-power. Mithras
wrestles and overpowers the initiate's control of their will,
reconfiguring their understanding of control-power to account for
transcendence (fig. 10).
A tauroctony shows: the self-command bull being sacrificed near the
shoulder; a Heimarmene-snake inevitably drawn toward ingesting the
entheogenic blood (often the snake approaches a wine-mixing bowl below
the bull instead); a blue-stemmed Psilocybe mushroom in Mithras' leg
and garment with 7-stepped stem; the sphere of the fixed stars shown
inside the underworld cave; billowing cape behind Mithras indicating
the ecstatic state; the god making the bull paralyzed and unable to
stand; and Mithras turning to look back behind his conventional
self-concept to see the source of thoughts and the movements of the
will, through a controlling ray (fig. 11).

Vertical Atonement for Rebellion-Guilt

Vicarious atonement entails a vertical shift upward of guilt and
responsibility to a higher-level controller, not a horizontal shift
sideways to a morally better person. A vertical 2-level legal and
moral relationship applies to all controller/agent scenarios:
master/slave, commander/soldier, programmer/robot, potter/clay,
puppetmaster/puppet, creator/creature, and virtual-world
creator/virtual agent.
Releasing a prisoner who is a rebel slave (claimant to autonomy), and
punishing a mock king in their stead by death sentence, is found in
the Roman Saturnalia and in the mystic allegory of Jesus' trial; the
rebel Barabbas (son of father) is released.
The Jesus figure was portrayed in the New Testament as the earthly
avatar and manifestation of the all-powerful and all-controlling
Jewish creator God (Thompson 2001). Jesus is held to be innocent in
the sense of not himself rebelling against God (that is, he never
mistook the pseudo-autonomy of personal control-agents as literal
autonomy), but being the Creator's representative avatar within the
created world, he was ultimately responsible or guilty for all
instances of such 'rebellion' which did occur by other people.
The dissociative-state revelation that higher-order power stands over
the source of our control-thoughts is described as killing,
rebirthing, and rendering the initiate no longer under the sentence of
death, making them mature, purified, washed clean, perfected,
imperishable, or possessing eternal life, in that they have already
died as an autonomous moral agent.
Lucifer fell from heaven, as Adam fell, due to pride through the
virtual power of his virtual free will, and justice consistent with
this metaphorical meaning-mode requires that he suffer a virtual
death-sentence for his rebellious autonomy-claim, this type of sin is
"punished" in the appropriate sense through mystic-state ego death and
done away with, justice about ultimate responsibility fulfilled, and
error about our independent self-command corrected.

The Sacred Marriage

In the ancient Greek tradition, marriage incorporated the themes of
death and abduction of the girl, together with entheogenic initiation
(Ruck 1978); similarly, Christ raptures-away and marries his Church,
the initiated elect, as his bride.
Your inner control-center is experienced as passively subject to and
penetrated by the hidden ultimate producer of all one's thoughts,
which attracts and overpowers the illusory and illegitimate
pseudo-autonomous self, and then marries that self.
The uncontrollable hidden separate controller you find that you are
subject to invades your innermost locus of control-power, as though
that innermost wellspring of your thoughts is your generative organ
and ego death is climax, giving birth to the new self that is married
to the higher, abducting controller. The sacred marriage of hidden and
visible levels of control, producing new life, is celebrated in the
wedding banquet with entheogenic mixed wine.
Group: egodeath Message: 4499 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/04/2006
Subject: Re: Article: The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
Bibliography

Michael Hoffman has been developing the Cybernetic Theory of Ego
Transcendence since 1985, including the maximal entheogen theory of
religion; see Egodeath.com.

Arbel, V. Beholders of Divine Secrets: Mysticism and Myth in the
Hekhalot and Merkavah Literature. Albany: SUNY, 2003.
Ashton, J. The Religion of Paul the Apostle. New Haven: Yale, 2000.
Balsekar, R. Who Cares? The Unique Teaching of Ramesh S. Balsekar.
Redondo Beach: Advaita, 1999.
Barton, T. Ancient Astrology. London: Routledge, 1994.
Bryan, C. Render to Caesar: Jesus, the Early Church, and the Roman
Superpower. New York: Oxford, 2005.
Collins, J. J. (editor), and M. Fishbane (editor). Death, Ecstasy, and
Other Worldly Journeys. Albany: SUNY, 1995.
Crowley, M. Secret Drugs of Buddhism forthcoming, and a talk presented
at Entheogenesis Conference 2004: “Mike Crowley on The Secret Drugs of
Buddhism”.
Culiano, I. Out of This World: Otherworldly Journeys from Gilgamesh to
Albert Einstein. Boston: Shambhala, 1991.
Cumont, F. Astrology and Religion among the Greeks and Romans. New
York: Dover, 1960 (1912).
Davies, S. Jesus the Healer: Possession, Trance, and the Origins of
Christianity. New York: Continuum, 1995.
Detering, H. Der Gefälschte Paulus; The Fabricated Paul: Early
Christianity in the Twilight. Düsseldorf: Patmos, 1995.
Doherty, E. The Jesus Puzzle: Did Christianity Begin with a Mythical
Christ? Challenging the Existence of an Historical Jesus. Ottawa:
Canadian Humanist. 1999.
Drews, A. Die Petruslegende; The Legend of Saint Peter: A Contribution
to the Mythology of Christianity. Frankfurt: Neuer Frankfurter, 1910,
1924.
Fishbane, M. The Kiss of God: Spiritual and Mystical Death in Judaism.
Seattle: University of Washington, 1994.
Forte, R. (editor). Entheogens and the Future of Religion. San
Francisco: Council on Spiritual Practices, 1997.
Fowden, G. The Egyptian Hermes: A Historical Approach to the Late
Pagan Mind. Princeton: Princeton University, 1986.
Freke, T.; and P. Gandy. The Complete Guide to World Mysticism.
London: Piatkus, 1997.
Grof, S. (editor), and C. Grof (editor). Spiritual Emergency: When
Personal Transformation Becomes a Crisis. New York: Tarcher/Putnam,
1989.
Grof, S.; and C. Grof. Beyond Death: The Gates of Consciousness.
London: Thames and Hudson, 1980.
Heinrich, C. Strange Fruit: Alchemy and Religion: The Hidden Truth.
London: Bloomsbury, 1994.
Hoffman, M. A. (editor). Entheos: The Journal of Psychedelic
Spirituality. Entheomedia.org, 2001-2002.
Hoffman, M. A., C. A. P. Ruck, and B. Staples. “The Entheogenic
Eucharist of Mithras”. Entheos 2.1:13-46 (2002).
Hoffman, M. S. “Wasson and Allegro on the Tree of Knowledge as
Amanita”. Journal of Higher Criticism, forthcoming, 2006.
Hoffman, M. S. “The Bubble of Simulation: Subjective Experience as a
Virtual Environment”. Crash Collusion 10:21-22, 1996.
Hofmann, A.; R. E. Schultes; and C. Ratsch. Plants of the Gods: Their
Sacred, Healing and Hallucinogenic Powers. Rochester: Healing Arts,
1992 (1979).
Johnson, L. T. Religious Experience in Earliest Christianity: A
Missing Dimension in New Testament Studies. Minneapolis: Augsburg,
1998.
Kubby, S. The Politics of Consciousness: A Practical Guide to Personal
Freedom. Port Townsend: Loompanics, 1995.
Martin, L. H. Hellenistic Religions: An Introduction. New York: Oxford
University, 1987.
Merkur, D. Gnosis: An Esoteric Tradition of Mystical Visions and
Unions. Albany: SUNY, 1993.
Merkur, D. The Psychedelic Sacrament: Manna, Meditation, and Mystical
Experience. Rochester: Park Street, 2001.
Metzner, R. The Unfolding Self: Varieties of Transformative
Experience. Novato: Origin, 1997 (1986).
Nasrallah, L. An Ecstasy of Folly: Prophecy and Authority in Early
Christianity. Cambridge: Harvard, 2003.
Oaklander, L. N. (editor), and Q. Smith (editor). The New Theory of
Time. New Haven: Yale, 1994.
Oaklander, L. N., and Q. Smith. Time, Change and Freedom: An
Introduction to Metaphysics. New York: Routledge, 1995.
Pagels, E. The Gnostic Paul: Gnostic Exegesis of the Pauline Letters.
Harrisburg: Trinity, 1992 (1975).
Pleket, H. W. “An Aspect of the Emperor Cult: Imperial Mysteries.”
Harvard Theological Review 58:331-47 (1965).
Pilch, J. J. Visions and Healing in the Acts of the Apostles: How the
Early Believers Experienced God. Collegeville: Liturgical, 2004.
Ruck, C.; B. Staples; and C. Heinrich. The Apples of Apollo: Pagan and
Christian Mysteries of the Eucharist. Durham: Carolina Academic, 2001.
Rucker, R. The Fourth Dimension: A Guided Tour of the Higher
Universes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1984.
Russell, D. Shamanism and the Drug Propaganda: Patriarchy and the Drug
War. Camden: Kalyx, 1998.
Shanon, B. The Antipodes of the Mind: Charting the Phenomenology of
the Ayahuasca Experience. New York: Oxford University, 2002.
Smith, D. E. From Symposium to Eucharist: The Banquet in the Early
Christian World. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2003.
Taylor-Perry, R. The God Who Comes: Dionysian Mysteries Reclaimed. New
York: Algora, 2003.
Thagard, P. Conceptual Revolutions. Princeton: Princeton University,
1992.
Thompson, M. M. The God of the Gospel of John. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans,
2001.
Ulansey, D. “The Eighth Gate: The Mithraic Lion-Headed Figure and the
Platonic World-Soul”. Forthcoming; online.
Vernant, J-P.; and P. Vidal-Naquet. Myth and Tragedy in Ancient
Greece. New York: Zone, 1988 (1972).
Wasson, R. G.; A. Hofmann, and C. Ruck. The Road to Eleusis: Unveiling
the Secret of the Mysteries. Los Angeles: Hermes, 1998 (1978).
Watts, A. “Zen and the Problem of Control”, in This Is It and Other
Essays. New York: Vintage, 1973 (1958).
Wegner, D. White Bears and Other Unwanted Thoughts: Suppression,
Obsession, and the Psychology of Mental Control. New York: Guilford,
1989.
White, R. Nietzsche and the Problem of Sovereignty. Chicago:
University of Illinois, 1997.
Williams, M. A. The Immovable Race: Gnostic Designation and the Theme
of Stability in Late Antiquity. Leiden: Brill, 1997.

Copyright © 2006 Michael S. Hoffman. All rights reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 4500 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 24/04/2006
Subject: Re: Article: The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
The Block Universe and Frozen Worldlines

Time can be envisioned as a space-like dimension, forming a block
universe that includes frozen, unchanging, snake-shaped personal
worldline threads, each snake or thread representing a person's entire
subjective stream of thoughts during their entire life (Rucker 1984)
(fig. 3). This perspective is characteristic of altered-state
perception. Analytic philosophy and space-time physics have been
brought together to construct a tenseless, static model of time
(Oaklander & Smith 1994).
Salvia divinorum presents a strong, clear sensation of spatial merging
and unity, and the static, frozen nature of time is perceived as a
collection of present moments, with time as a space-like dimension,
but with space itself seen to be not simply present, but rather,
mediated through present mental representations. The feeling of Salvia
is strange yet familiar, returning the mind to home-base – the
block-universe Origin.
Metaphors for experiencing embeddedness in the frozen, timeless
block-universe include the end of time, imprisonment, and fastening
the body to physical objects. The Ground of Being or Tao that flows
everywhere including one's mind, escaping the endless round of moral
karma and its unbroken causal chain, and avoiding rebirth into a
material body are expressions of experiencing the frozen timeless
block universe and transcending the idea of autonomous moral agency.

Time as a Space-like Dimension

In the dissociative cognitive state, objects and the controlling
ego-entity are explicitly perceived as extended across time; they are
perceptibly distributed along a fixed and pre-set stream of
time-slices frozen into position, such that a person appears as a
living statue consisting of a series and set of statues or
image-frames in incrementally different poses.
Time is no longer perceived as a flow, but as a frozen expanse and
positional relationship of stationary, distinct and separated
time-slices, with mental constructs, including personal
control-thoughts, permanently laid out across the time axis.

Physical Fastening of All Thoughts and Actions

In the dissociative state, all actions anyone has done in the world,
good and evil, are experienced as physically attached to one's own
arms, body, and frozen-into-spacetime train of thoughts.
Prometheus is chained looking out from the rock; king Pirithous and
Theseus are fused into the banqueting bench in Hades' and Persephone's
kingdom; king Pentheus is caught up in the tree looking out; Osiris is
trapped in the coffin by his brother; these are all physically
connected to the cross Jesus is nailed to, together with his elect:
dissociative-state initiates.
Hades imprisoned Persephone's would-be suitors/abductors by fusing
them to a magical bench and binding them to it with snakes while
preparing them a banquet with wine. It was possible for Heracles to
free the divine hero Theseus, but Heracles had to leave king Pirithous
behind, fused into the banqueting bench in Hades for eternity, because
the whole world shook when Heracles pulled him; this describes the
dissociative-state sensation of physical embeddedness in the timeless
block-universe, followed by abandoning the former pseudo-sovereign
model of one's personal control agency.

Fixed Worldlines of Subjective Experiencing

A person's subjective stream of conscious experience constituting
their entire life is a worldline frozen and embedded in spacetime in
the shape of a snake or a thread woven and cut by the Fates to a
predefined, finite length.
To be bitten by a snake, as in the allegory of Paul the Apostle after
his shipwreck, means to perceive the fatedness of one's entire stream
of thoughts. The seer Balaam had an unavoidable encounter with the
angel of death on a winding path with no place to turn aside, and was
permitted to pass upon acknowledging that he speaks the words God puts
in his mouth.
The initiate's pre-set worldline of experiencing and thoughts, nearing
the point of ingesting entheogens, was portrayed as a Heimarmene-snake
that is destined and drawn by Necessity to drink the entheogenic
libation of psychoactive wine in the wine-mixing bowl, or consume the
psychoactive sacrificial cake on the sacrificial altar (fig. 4).
Sacrifice is predestined and frozen into spacetime, comparable to the
labyrinth path leading the sacrificial youths to the Minotaur in the
central lair every year, and comparable to a city's festival
procession past sacred landmarks to a sacrifice at an altar. When
Perseus shows Medusa's Heimarmene-snaked head to king Polydectes and
his followers at the feast with 'mixed wine', they turn into stone,
helplessly frozen.

Religion as Accommodation to Everything Being Pre-set

During the visionary-plant initiation, the feeling of being a
control-agent moving through time and space is replaced by the
sensation and perception of no-free-will – frozen-time block-universe
determinism – while the mind adjusts its mental world-model to fit the
transcendent perspective.
The Israelites rebelled against the Lord, so the Lord sent snakes
which fatally bit them; when the remaining people told Moses they had
sinned in speaking against the Lord, he told Moses to put a rigid
brass snake on a pole, which the Israelites had to look at to prevent
them from dying from these snake-bites. These themes indicate
realizing personal non-control with respect to time: the pole's shadow
indicates time through its movement; the snake's rigidity and shape
represent one's finite-length, pre-set worldline; and fatal snake-bite
indicates ego death upon seeing all one's thoughts as timelessly
pre-set and given; to be cured is to continue life after ego death,
purified of misattribution of the source of one's thoughts and power
of will.
'The chosen race of God', 'the elect', 'the immovable race', and
'double-predestination' express the idea that two sets of people are
timelessly pre-determined: those destined to be experientially
initiated into no-free-will, and those destined to remain under the
delusion of autonomous personal control-power.
The Minoan goddess ominously wields and controls initiates'
predestined worldlines (fig. 5).

Vertical, Timeless Determinism

Late antique consciousness was centered around the doctrine and
mystic-state experience of the pre-setness of future thoughts and
occurrences. Heimarmene (Fatedness, Necessity, or timeless cosmic
determinism) was the central thematic concern of religions in the
Hellenistic era (Martin 1987). Similarly, Philosophical Metaphysics
investigates tenseless time, fatedness, agent movement through space
and time, and controller agents (Oaklander & Smith 1995).
The future is unchangeable and pre-set because of the static relation
of control to the time dimension, and because of the illusory aspect
of the continuant agent exercising power while moving through time.
Modern science introduces clockwork determinism and thereby reduces
the person to an automaton; Copenhagenist quantum mechanics aims to
provide an emancipating alternative to hidden-variables determinism,
but through intellectual activity and a flowing conception of time
that are based in the ordinary cognitive state, unlike ancient
approaches.

Two Jumps to Transcend Determinism

Determinism is both a praised goal and a disparaged trap to escape,
due to determinism-awareness being the intermediate but not final goal
of religious mental transformation. Valentinian Gnosticism affirmed
cosmic determinism but also transcended it, and formulated two
contrasting schemes of thinking about moral culpability (Pagels 1992).
3-stage initiation paths centered around determinism are often posed
as a 2-stage system: they both endorse and disparage the realization
of determinism, which is the intermediate destination on the path to
salvific regeneration. The first demon or stage of egoic delusion to
be cast out is the assumption of simple independent self-command and
freewill; the second demon to be overcome is the mental model of
cosmic determinism or fatedness, in its practical problem-raising
aspect.

Fatedness and Control in Astral Ascent Mysticism

Heimarmene was centrally important in ancient astrological cosmology
(Barton 1994), and a major theme in Hellenistic-Roman astral ascent
mysticism and religion (Cumont 1960). Transcending astral fatedness
involved ingesting holy food, ambrosial water, and astrological
medicine (Fowden 1986).
Astral ascent mysticism centers around the dangerous gateway or
"fatal" boundary crossing – the sphere of the fixed stars –
representing the apprehension of Heimarmene and its control of one's
thoughts. The planets wind around the world in a spiral pattern over
time, depicted by the Heimarmene-snake wrapped around the cosmos,
cosmic egg, or Mithraic lion-headed figure.
Saturn, as governor or gatekeeper of the outermost planetary sphere
which is associated with the sphere of the fixed stars, rides in a
serpent-drawn chariot and eats the child or youthful self-concept as
the price of passage across the boundary into the transcendent heavens
beyond the starry Heimarmene-boundary.
Ancient Jewish writings metaphorically describe mystic-state
experiences, including the problem of how to get past various
threatening gatekeepers that are encountered during ascent (Arbel
2003). Pre-modern Christianity held that the body (lower self) was
controlled by Fate, but that the regenerated spirit (higher,
ultra-transcendent part of oneself) was above Fate, residing outside
the sphere of the fixed stars. Christ tramples the cross of cosmic
Heimarmene as the X-crossed gates of hell, when harrowing hell and
rescuing the elect from limbo (control's impotence in the face of
cosmic determinism and fatedness).
The hidden transcendent thought-source has been depicted as a hand
behind a cloud controlling the world-soul whose spirit transcends
material Necessity; the world-soul then controls fate-subject
creatures (fig. 6).
Group: egodeath Message: 4501 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/04/2006
Subject: Egodeath article
http://www.egodeath.com/EntheogenTheoryOfReligion.htm

I got the article down to 7600 words, not counting the table of
contents, which I don't think will be published in the magazine.
Clearer, tighter structure; additional substantial content,
streamlined writing.

Yesterday was a breakthrough — the loop closed. This article draft
finally fits my vision for what a summary of the theory should feel
like: crisp, Zen-like, self-consistent, the wind whistling through the
bits in the code, amazingly efficient, drenched with ramifications,
simple, unusually clear with a combination of alien strange
surprisingness and yet obviousness, unbelievable to see on the screen,
a milestone for entering the post-modern era, tying back to the
Hellenistic-Roman and Christian foundation of our culture; yet
absolutely recognizably a product of the late 20th and early 21st
Century. An artifact sitting outside the time-stream, coming in from
another direction, another dimension, yet not feeling affected or
fake-hipster posturing.

If I write of cybernetics, it's because I mean it, not because the
prefix 'cyber' is supposed to be cool (anyway it's probably about the
uncoolest thing now). I toned down any computer analogies — too
ephemeral; these too easily become dated. I mention the Matrix
movies, unfortunately trendy, but they are that relevant. I mention
such things *despite* the fact that they may stink of trendiness. The
theory gets cool points because it *is* cool, not because it postures
as cool by borrowing coolness by dropping pop names — I reject the
pomo popcult attitude and motivation. James Kent's book draft has
this same quality, of being cooler because it's plainspoken and not
straining, posturing, trying to borrow coolness because it's incapable
of delivering authentic coolness.

The article required a delicate handling of Christian themes, to meet
the requirements of Christian theology.

Late 60s pop-sike songs helped.

It's shocking enough in an integrated combination of so many ways,
this helps secure my priority. Who the hell else is advocating
self-control seizure, no historical Paul, myth being the same thing as
religion, all of antiquity drenched in entheogens, if not up to 1700.
Who the hell else affirms hard determinism, and magically,
miraculously transcending it, during the late-modern era? It is
*crucial* to distance oneself from all other theorists, to stand out.
A theory is nothing if it doesn't stand out from the noise. I harness
the real radicalness of religion, prevent people from closing their
minds and glazing over when it's mentioned.

Religion is mind-blowing. These are all marketing techniques, so to
speak, but *natural* ones. The challenge was to elicit the full,
complete *innate* mind-blowingness of the subject matter — not to
fake-up radicalness. The subject needs no fake radical aura attached;
but rather, it needs its own innate authentic radical aura to be
brought out. Dare to imagine the truth, that the drug schedules are
satanic and will be overthrown by the churches. Entheogens in the
pulpit again? Think it. Culturally integrated self-control seizure?
You bet. Think it. Society admitting there was most likely no Jesus
and Paul? Think it.

A big challenge was set by my 1996 summary, which is dauntingly
efficient, but it didn't have anything about the past, the future, or
metaphor.

I ended up weaving myth-clarifying sentences with pure theory
sentences. A huge help was using an Outtakes file, so I never had to
delete any paragraphs, but just move them out.

My vision for the article has never naturally included illustrations.
Regarding theory, and web-publishing, I'm strongly biased in favor of
text.

A few weeks ago I took a fresh look at my Dec. 25 draft and felt there
was far too much blur and repetition and seas of text. I finally
managed to formulate a structure with 4 main H1 sections, averaging 7
H2 sections each — this worked out to a miniscule limit of only 178
words per section, were it to hit 7000 words altogether. It's a
miracle I'm as close to that goal of ultra-compactness as I am. I've
printed out and edited at least 16 drafts recently. I think of
Einstein's 1905 impressively concise and compact papers on quantum
electrodynamics. I consider compactness a main measure of merit and
profundity of a theory: say the maximum, as clearly as can be, in the
minimum number of words, like the most fundamental physics equations.
This is an ideal of the Enlightenment — the influence of Newton's
Principia.

I want people to ask how I got so much theory into such a small space
while keeping it clear and obvious-seeming, or at least, super
self-coherent. I think this high coherence will make the theory
endure and establish my priority, so that no one can say I put out a
half-formed theory; it's a tight, closed loop, an integral whole, so
that if someone asks who first wrote-up this theory, there can be no
doubt that I had the full-fledged core. It's all just details, after
this, debates on points, but this theory-summary should endure and
stand the test of time as the point of reference — the first moment
in late-modernity when a writer "got it", got this set or system of
ideas. It's definitely a system, that's what I want to make clear; no
one can say I just put out half a system.


— Michael Hoffman
http://www.egodeath.com — simple theory of the ego-death and rebirth
experience based on dissociation, determinism, cybernetics, and
metaphor



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: egodeath Message: 4502 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 25/04/2006
Subject: Re: Article: The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
http://www.egodeath.com/EntheogenTheoryOfReligion.htm — properly
formatted copy

The current draft is basically the final draft, to appear in print,
except that I'll upload the illustrations tomorrow.
Group: egodeath Message: 4503 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 27/04/2006
Subject: Lyrics: Colors of My Life, by West Coast Branch
Artist: West Coast Branch
Song: Colors of My Life
Late 1960s


If I had my way I think I'd leave
Thoughts before eyes I can unseen
Stand inside myself and then the walls come tumbling down
I must find a way to get my feet back on the ground

Colors of my life go [fall? float?] flashing by
I can't even stop to peace unwind [and quiet?]
There are things that can't be changed they just go on and on
Though these things aren't a rearranged it doesn't mean they're wrong

Everything I do is part of me
All these things are planned consistently
There are grooves which you must follow they are [going wrong?]
If you stand outside the line your kingdom has to fall

Colors of my life go flashing by
I can't even stop to peace unwind [and quiet?]
Stand inside myself and then the walls come tumbling down
I must find a way to get my feet back on the ground



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: egodeath Message: 4504 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 27/04/2006
Subject: Loss of sense of cross-time control
http://www.egodeath.com/EntheogenTheoryOfReligion.htm

I uploaded some of the illustrations, about to try uploading the
remaining 6 planned ones.

I'm looking forward to reading this article. I'm absolutely prepared
to put it forth as it is, although my thinking is continuing to change
and develop.

I might overuse the vague term or characterization "seizure". The
galloi, priests of Attis and his goddess Cybele, were not undergoing
seizure but rather, transcendence of the mode-specific semi-hardwired
egoic restraining instinct of self-preservation, in a way that makes
the body gendered somewhat like the soul, female.

The ability to deliberately harm the body by one's own hand — less
remarkable given the recent trend of body art — is not proof or
demonstration of seizure, or insanity, or some single-dimensional lone
aspect of the altered state; rather, it's just one kind of act that
expresses one characteristic of being familiar with the intense
dissociative state.

Seizure is not the ultimate or peak lone effect; rather, the highly
developed intense cognitive dissociative state is marked by a broad
set of dynamics, of which such "seizure" is only one.

Should we think of the experience from the point of view of the ego
down below, or the god-like elevated consciousness that can be
frighteningly aloof and dispassionate about the sometimes drama of the
egoic terror? What's the peak state or peak realization like? It's
like a *set* of dynamics: there are various ways we can reflect on
these dynamics, and no one story is right.

'Seizure' should not be framed or portrayed as a master narrative; the
wound in the side doesn't only reflect "seizure", but rather, several
dynamics, several potentials and ways of thinking about transcendent
points, transcendent dynamics. The "seizure wound", or however we are
to think of the knife in Mithras' bull and the spear in Jesus' side,
reflects a confluence, a set of transcendent dynamics; that hole or
wound in the ego's side stands as an overall "not" to the usual egoic
restraints of mental processing.

The mind re-identifies its thinking around higher awareness that pulls
back out from the egoic mind, like a sail unfurling behind the mind.
What then happens, in that state? Lots of things happen and can
happen — certain ones are particularly notable as a sort of
experiential gateway one has little choice but to pass through and
become familiar with, such as the ability to deliberately make
self-control disprove or override itself in some sense, however we may
frame or spin that overcoming of control. In the dissociative state,
control is overcome in the mind — however you frame it. You overcome
it, you are overcome, you succumb, you master fear, you become master
at fearing, you become a higher you, you expand, you uplift, you
break, you become unbreakable; in the act of breaking, you manifest
not having broken.

When one lost control, one never lost control; one was in control at
every moment same as ever, and one never was in control. The concepts
of being in control, and losing control, are as strange as time,
consciousness, and movement through space. What do we think of time?
of religion? of losing control? of being in control? The concepts of
"being in control" and "losing control" become problematized and
de-familiarized in the dissociative state; both of them start to seem
too vaguely defined to mean all that much; assessing one's degree of
being in control raises more questions than clarification.

These questions are characteristic of the dissociative state. It's
not easy to summarize the multiple ways of thinking about the altered
state and its control-related experiential insights — an entire
multi-faceted mode of thinking is opened up. That's why I've been
hesitant to give the impression that fear of loss of control is the
only possible way to think about some peak. These various responses,
including control-fear monsters, and the feeling of a close call and
narrow rescue from on high, have certainly happened, even typically,
but can the more enlightened modern thinkers today think of something
more positive than Buddha's army of demons being halted by his
touching the ground? And will those many people who do happened to
become alarmed about control losing a grip on its untrammeled,
dis-cohering power benefit from something more positive than being
rescued by miraculously receiving the belief, in the nick of time, of
a compassionate savior?


"Guidance systems breakdown". Cross-time control dis-integrates. In
the ordinary state, with tight cognitive binding, there is, in effect,
a kind of cross-time control, which dis-integrates during loose
cognition. This leave a kind of control present in each moment,
isolated from the other moments and unchained from the constraining
cares of the usual cross-time self, now become a mere idea like an
impotent time-voyaging superego-demon that usually serves as one's
ordinary-state guardian eagle. Now, instead, there is only the
mysteriously originated moment-by-moment self, needing some stability
to complement its own overall-uncontrolled moment-by-moment control.

Wanting to retain control, is actually a concept of "my overall
time-voyaging ego wants to enter the dissociative state while claiming
that it, the time-voyaging ego, still retains the reins in hand".
Instead, moment-by-moment, time-slice-isolated control may remain, but
God only knows what it'll do; it cannot rely on the time-voyaging
notion of oneself to restrain it; it can pray for a higher controller
— as one popular effective response — to grant it good thoughts upon
acknowledging that it has no cross-time stability. These ways of
thinking and perspectives arrive together as a package, as a mode of
thinking.


The article, while flawed and subject to updating and revising,
provides much food for thought. With so few words available,
currently 6,800 in the body of the article, it's really hard to be
accurate, comprehensive, and state the final word on the matter.
Maybe I'll write a different version of a summary later, though this
one is in the ballpark.
Group: egodeath Message: 4505 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 28/04/2006
Subject: Re: Article: The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
Almost all the illustrations are small in layout and filesize now;
cleaned up and cropped. I'll clean up the captions and the last
couple large layout illustrations soon.


—–Original Message—–
From: egodeath@yahoogroups.com [mailto:egodeath@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Michael Hoffman
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 1:13 AM
To: 'Egodeath Group'
Subject: RE: [egodeath] Article: The Entheogen Theory of Religion and
Ego Death


http://www.egodeath.com/EntheogenTheoryOfReligion.htm — properly
formatted copy

The current draft is basically the final draft, to appear in print,
except that I'll upload the illustrations tomorrow.
Group: egodeath Message: 4506 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 29/04/2006
Subject: Acid lyrics and concert audiences
SlowBuffalo wrote:

RE: Dionysian Initiations are alive and well

>>I've never understood why scholars of Ego Death/Acid Rock focus on
Jimi Hendrix, Jefferson Airplane, Beatles, etc yet minimalize/frown
the role of the Grateful Dead. Let us not forget that the meaning of
Grateful Dead is to be happy to experience an ego death. Countless
Deadheads talk about their ego death experiences. I don't hear many
fans of Rush talk about experiencing an intiation at a concert. The
financier of the Dead was the infamous alchemist Owsley. Without the
Dead, the Acid
movement would not have survived. Think about it. Today, there are
many offshoot bands from the Grateful Dead like Phish, String Cheese
Incident, Blues Traveler, and Widespread Panic. These bands continue
to explore realms and provide initiations. If you haven't already, go
to a Widespread Panic, String Cheese Incident and/or RatDog show this
summer and feel the immense energy of the collective consciousness. I
think you will be happily surprised that their lyrics of chunk full of
mysticism.


I'll consider Widespread Panic, String Cheese Incident, and RatDog.

The Dead's lyricists seem to deliberately avoid alluding to acid
phenomena, as if to calm the very present acid experience in the Dead
scene by diverting attention from it and escaping into shallow
good-time-ism. Meanwhile, the artists *themselves* in heavy rock
bands seem to be intent on presenting their acid-poem allusions to
each other in an intense insider tradition. Dead shows have lots of
acid and no acid lyrics, while the Heavy Rock shows have little acid
and lots of lyrics about acid.

Hendrix, Airplane, and Beatles have scattered acid lyrics. Mid-era
Metallica, and early-half Rush have lots of acid lyrics. But
ultimately acid lyrics are present in individual songs rather than
entire albums or entire artists' repertoire.
Group: egodeath Message: 4507 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 29/04/2006
Subject: Film: A Scanner Darkly
I can't vouch for the following blurb.

_________________

Powerful New Film Expertly Exposes Phony Drug War & Police State

A Scanner Darkly set to shake collective unconsciousness through viral
popular culture shot in the arm

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com | April 28 2006

A new film set for release later this year chronicles how power
interests exploit the drug war in order to create unthinking armies of
drone servants and erect police state measures to prevent the people
from ever glimpsing the dark truth behind a highly mechanized
surveillance panopticon.

A Scanner Darkly is a powerful dystopic film set in the terrifying
near future– a world controlled by high-tech surveillance and ruled
by a liberty-destroying police state. Director Richard Linklater picks
up where he left off with his ground-breaking Waking Life– its
rotoscoped look has now advanced exponentially into a startling visual
element which only supports the themes of this new film. A Scanner
Darkly is a heavily researched, amazingly conceived blend of Phillip
K. Dick's acclaimed novel and the frightening real technology emerging
in our threatened world.

The film stars Keanu Reeves, Robert Downy, Jr., Woody Harrelson,
Winona Ryder and features Alex Jones himself– still bullhorning the
truth in the future nightmare world. The Warner Brothers film is
currently slated for release on July 7, 2006.

This movie brilliantly exposes the fraud of the drug war and how
governments and power interests engender chaos in order to maintain
their stranglehold on the human population.

Set in suburban Orange County California in the near future,
undercover cop Keanu Reeves is ordered to start spying on his friends.
A leviathan corporation, New Path, controls a drug named substance D,
which causes its users to experience paranoid delusions and fantasies
and eventually turns them into zombies.

An iron fist police state, a multi-tentacle surveillance grid and the
abolition of freedom of speech protects the truth behind Substance D,
a reality the characters seek to quantify in the midst of their
hallucinogenic haze.

Society is managed similar to the tyranny of Communist China, where
protesters are simply grabbed off the street and disappeared, as
encapsulated by Alex Jones' role.

The final unveiling of the scope of how New Path exploits the
addiction of Substance D users for its own purposes will leave the
viewer reeling from a volcanic blast of contemporary social
commentary.

If you enjoyed the rotoscoping effects seen on Waking Life then
prepare yourself to be blown away by the visual appeal of this
masterpiece. Every single frame is a work of art. The creators have
managed to produce a graphic novel come to life, without losing one
iota of the facial characteristics and body language encountered
through standard cinematography.

The film is a multi-layered waterfall of refreshing ideas and
concepts. Running parallel is a strong and consistent element of humor
throughout.

A Scanner Darkly represents the latest example of a refreshing and
burgeoning trend in Hollywood that seeks to enlighten the viewer into
recognizing the real world prison barriers being erected around
society today.

The contribution A Scanner Darkly will make to the alternative truth
movement cannot be understated. For those who believe in the
possibility of the 100th monkey syndrome and how the collective
unconsciousness can be changed through popular culture, Scanner stands
out as a watershed moment in the desire to lift the human spirit and
create a better world not just through deeds but the very act of
thought and understanding alone.

A Scanner Darkly is a ripple in the fabric of human awakening and its
impact will send shockwaves through the New World Order architects and
make them fully understand that a growing majority are becoming aware
of their machinations and plans.

This isn't airy fairy nebulous wishful thinking, it is historically
visible that revolutions in the way we perceive the world around us
and thus change it occur simultaneously and as a result of positive
viral injections, whether they come from science, religion,
technology, maverick individuals or popular culture. Film is still the
zeitgeist of the human psyche.

A Scanner Darkly is a prescient warning of the near-term world that
awaits us all unless we stand in the way of those who would seek to
crush the human soul and shackle an infinite ball and chain around our
feet.

The sheer genius behind the creation of the Scanner website is a joy
to behold. This is the most 'leap off the monitor' website you are
ever likely to see. It puts you in the position of the Scanner, able
to cycle through different surveillance subjects and overview their
connections to each other.

Also featured is New Path's psychological evaluation tool. What will a
Scanner see in you? It depends on what you see in the images provided.
You will soon learn that Substance D causes enough confusion for you
to be labeled with a level of brain dysfunction that requires at least
observation if not immediate treatment.

The website tracks the number of mouse clicks you make, eerie instant
messages pop up, and you can put your own live image on the website
with a webcam.

There is even an option to upload your own artwork, using either
templates provided by the website or entirely your own creation from
scratch. Screensavers, wallpaper, buddy icons, trailers, audio files
and e-cards are just some of the other great features offered.

The appeal and 'stickability' of this website will keep you clicking
round for at least an hour to make sure you sample the full
smorgasbord of what it has to offer. Click here to visit the website
now.

If the quality of both the trailer and the website are any indication,
this film is likely to blow open previous movie conventions and
deliver a powerful warning of a not-so-distant world that we can only
hope will not solidify into a permanent prison planet.

Philip K. Dick was a visionary decades ahead of his time. A Scanner
Darkly represents both a warning and a shining tribute to the
abilities of a prominent new crop of producers and directors.

A Scanner Darkly must be commended for its artistic flair and bold
intellectual stance. We are sure that it will join the tide of change
in making Americans think for themselves and devise creative new ways
to reach new people and spread the truth about what is taking place in
our world.

It is important to support this film in every way possible and open
the door for other similar creations to follow in its footsteps.

RELATED:

Warner Brothers' A Scanner Darkly Website

A Scanner Darkly Film Trailer

'A Scanner Darkly' Reveals Near Future Police State

Prison Planet.tv: The Premier Multimedia Subscription Package:
Download and Share the Truth!

———————————————————————-
———-
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

Visit the group "Propaganda_Matrix" on the web.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: egodeath Message: 4508 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 29/04/2006
Subject: Mystic religion is solution to problem of viable, true, dual-mode c
The latest summary-article draft is at
http://www.egodeath.com/EntheogenTheoryOfReligion.htm. I'm going to
update it per below.


Some sort of self-control seizure, or the threat and vulnerability to
it, may be a problem, but it's not the entire problem, and neither is
it an isolated component. 'Self-control seizure' is not the master
narrative, nor one isolated dynamic among many.

A synthesis explains how the various points of view and dynamics of
peak experiential insight fit together as a coherent system,
integrating several insights to solve the problem of combining viable
control with revised understanding. Mystic religion is a solution to
the problem of combining viable control with revised, valid
understanding. The ordinary cognitive state has a moderate degree of
viable control, but it's puzzling why it's only a moderate degree, and
the egoic ordinary-state control-system is based on misperception and
misunderstanding about personal control-power.

The egoic personal control-system is proven and revealed as based on
falsity, and in the dissociative state, it dis-coheres across
time-slices; the egoic personal control system, in light of the
dissociative state, is not viable logically, experientially, or
practically. Yet some viable control-system is needed, or chaos
threatens, with unintegrated control existing in each time-slice,
originating from a practically random source.


The essence of the path and problem is:

1. First, there's a misattribution of one's cross-time egoic
self-concept as the simple ultimate originator of one's own thoughts
and the integrating governor of these thoughts over time. Lack of
perfect self-control across time in the ordinary state is
unsatisfactory, and there's a Faustian wish to gain the full
self-control power one expects one should have.

2. In the dissociative state, wielding personal power across time is
shown as partly an illusion, a mere pattern of misperception; control
dis-integrates into unrestrained control within each time-slice; and
control at each time-slice is shown to not really originate from
oneself as a cross-time voyaging control-agent, nor from oneself as a
momentary time-slice originator and controller of one's own thoughts.
So the problem is posed; the problem becomes clear: retreat into the
delusions, lies, and illusions of egoic self-control concepts is
certainly not acceptable, yet one needs a practical, viable, coherent,
effective self-control system that's useful across time, rather than
sheer chaos with moment-to-moment self-control originating randomly
and disconnected across-time.

3. Mystic religion is the solution to this problem, as well as the
search for the solution to this problem, providing a combination of
the usual egoic control-system together with a higher modification and
addition. Familiar egoic self-control concepts are recognized as
delusion, one originates no power, and yet some viable alternative
non-flawed and stable personal control-system is needed.


The requirements as part of the problem definition and the solution
criteria are:

o The improved personal control system must be legit (non-deluded,
logically coherent),

o The improved personal control system must be effective (coherent,
stable, integrated across time and across the two cognitive states,
not filled with turmoil and frustration and self-challenging of
control-power)

o The improved personal control system must accommodate the fact that
the egoic control system as an impression and predominant point of
view will continue to be in some way present in the ordinary cognitive
state.


The solution:

1) must be viable and less dissonant and frustrating than the egoic
control-system; that is, must lack that source of dissonance and
frustration, and

2) must not be based on delusion, and

3) must take into account the usual, useful presence of the
conventional illusion-utilizing egoic control system.


The sacred marriage is designed as the solution to this problem. The
*transcendent* personal control system, as opposed to the *egoic*
personal control system:

1. Has a transcendent assumption that cross-time order prevails (it's
viable and non-frustrating across time)

2. Has its power attributed as originating from the mysterious hidden
transcendent source of thoughts, not from oneself as simple autonomous
thought-originator (it's not delusion-based about the source of the
origination of thoughts)

3. Integrates the egoic structures of self-control with transcendent
realization of the ultimate source of thoughts (it's dual-state,
dual-structure integrated).


This is the problem I was working on, and why I was studying the
dynamics of control, and why I considered the problem of control-chaos
threat and vulnerability.

The insights combined are:

o A kind of self-wounding (stigmata) is needed to disprove once and
for all, with finality, the power of egoic self-control over time.
This amounts to a realization, a mental disproof, rather than action;
a realization about action and control and the ability of control to
cancel itself out.


In the dissociative state, the following experiential insights occur
together as a system:

o Panic, helplessness, and seizure of self-control.

o The layer splitting of control, between oneself as
secondary-level-only controller, driven by the mysterious hidden
primary control-level.

o One learns to take the lower and the distinct higher-identification
points of view: "what should I do to regain my control" (said as the
lower point of view); "what does the higher source of thoughts do to
me to give me a replacement control-system or set of wings?" (said as
the higher point of view).

o Who's the actor vs. passive

o Perceiving the threat of instability of control, if one has no real
power of control across time or within a time-slice.

o Perceive the need to trust the mysterious source of thoughts, and
the need for some kind of transcendent rationality.

o Your power has been taken away or shown as never having been there
(in the way usually conceived) but as an illusion, in the sense of
your delusion of having had power in first place, and also, your
stability is taken away.

o You experience having no arms, having no ability or power to
control your arms, only passively perceiving them, passively
perceiving the power that arises in your mind.

o There are arms and power, but none that originates from me; no one
(no personal self) at the helm to steer thoughts and power

o There is control now, but not integrated across the time slices;

o There is no stabilizing ballast connecting one's control across the
time slices.

o You become too radically, chaotically free (no sense of cross-time
coherent restraint-power), and completely unfree, and never having had
freedom

o You seize, or suffer the risk of seizing


Taking here the higher point of view, where the transcendent is the
only actor/initiator of action:

1. The hidden higher source of thoughts takes away or abducts your
accustomed false sense of self-power

2. The hidden higher source of thoughts shows you what it can make you
do (chaos) given no cross-time glue

3. The hidden higher source of thoughts then gives you a higher,
mystery-based identification and ballast which now incorporates your
previous conceptions into a new 2-part system.


Experiential insights that all arise as a set and system together in
the dissociative cognitive state:

o You realize that egoic pseudo-power is actually null and is just
the projection from a pattern from who knows where

o You realize that you have no ultimate power to put in place or
actively "do" and "secure" some alternative transcendent conception

o Your power divides into unlinked control monads in each timeslice,
producing mysterious practically uncontrollable untrammeled "power"
with no stability/continuity/coordination across time, which amounts
to no power

o You have no ballast (other than retreating into unacceptable
self-delusion), implying or raising the question of life-destructive
sheer chaos and randomness

o You need a way of cohering control across time given no substantial
power over yourself across time.

o You perceive the revealed reality of no personal power (either
across time or within the timeslice as far as originated power);

o The usual ballast (egoic control, imperfect but somewhat stable) is
gone

o Egoic control-thinking is undesirable and unacceptable because
based/premised on illusion/misperception.

o Oneself has no primary independent power to create or originate any
replacement ballast even if you could think of a ballast that wasn't
delusion-based.


The cross-time ego is seen as empty of its own power, but the egoic
scheme amounts to a kind of power as a pattern originating from who
knows where, with some degree of stabilizing power, albeit with its
inbuilt frustrations (per Wilber's Atman project theory) that one
eventually *insists* on outgrowing and transcending (Wilber).

You can't actively make restabilization happen yourself as
power-initiating actor; the Ground of Being or higher and ultimate
source of thoughts drives that as the only real originator of action.
Just as biology makes puberty happen to us regardless of our choice,
so does the Ground of Being that is the real originator of our thought
make our realization happen to us and in our minds, and it makes our
rejection of egoic delusion happen.

Ultimately, the source of thoughts, rather than ourselves as egoic
phantom, is the real source of our rejecting our old self and makes us
be frustrated and displeased with our old self. The higher
thought-source makes us chase the Faustian project of eliminating our
erroneous notions about personal control power.

The thought-source then shows the real origin of thoughts (disproving
and wounding the phantom-self as source of thoughts), then it restores
viable control across time, now revised to accommodate these insights
and eliminate the old frustrating, inherently unsatisfying conceptions
about personal control power.

Ganymede doesn't choose to fly off, driving an eagle; rather, Zeus
takes the initiative, sending his eagle to fly off with Ganymede. The
god (as the real, ultimate source of thoughts) is the
actor/abductor/marrier of the soul, it initiates breaking one's
delusion, it provides the alt view, it causes the sacred marriage;
Christ marries his bride the church; he initiates the sacred marriage.
Group: egodeath Message: 4509 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 29/04/2006
Subject: Re: Mystic religion is solution to problem of viable, true, dual-mo
This is a re-post with basic improvements of organization, and the
word 'frustrating' inserted more to characterize the egoic
personal-control-system, a "fortunate frustration" which serves as the
driving impetus toward the transcendent.

The latest summary-article draft is at
http://www.egodeath.com/EntheogenTheoryOfReligion.htm. I'm going to
update it per below.

__________________

The egoic personal-control-system is a "fortunate frustration" which
serves as the driving impetus toward the transcendent.

Some sort of self-control seizure, or the threat and vulnerability to
it, may be a problem, but it's not the entire problem, and neither is
it an isolated component. 'Self-control seizure' is not the master
narrative, nor one isolated dynamic among many.

A synthesis explains how the various points of view and dynamics of
peak experiential insight fit together as a coherent system,
integrating several insights to solve the problem of combining viable
control with revised understanding. Mystic religion is a solution to
the problem of combining viable control with revised, valid
understanding. The ordinary cognitive state has a moderate degree of
viable control, but it's puzzling why it's only a moderate degree, and
the egoic ordinary-state control-system is based on misperception and
misunderstanding about personal control-power.

The egoic personal control-system is proven and revealed as based on
falsity, and in the dissociative state, it dis-coheres across
time-slices; the egoic personal control system, in light of the
dissociative state, is not viable logically, experientially, or
practically. Yet some viable control-system is needed, or chaos
threatens, with unintegrated control existing in each time-slice,
originating from a practically random source.

_______________________________________

The essence of the path and problem is:

1. First, there's a misattribution of one's cross-time egoic
self-concept as the simple ultimate originator of one's own thoughts
and the integrating governor of these thoughts over time. Lack of
perfect self-control across time in the ordinary state is
unsatisfactory, and there's a Faustian wish to gain the full
self-control power one expects one should have.

2. In the dissociative state, wielding personal power across time is
shown as partly an illusion, a mere pattern of misperception; control
dis-integrates into unrestrained control within each time-slice; and
control at each time-slice is shown to not really originate from
oneself as a cross-time voyaging control-agent, nor from oneself as a
momentary time-slice originator and controller of one's own thoughts.

So the problem is posed; the problem becomes clear: retreat into the
delusions, lies, and illusions of egoic self-control concepts is not
acceptable, because it's not logically coherent, practically coherent,
or satisfactory, yet the driving problem and motivation for this whole
project is that one needs a practical, viable, coherent, effective
self-control system that's useful across time, rather than sheer chaos
with moment-to-moment self-control originating randomly and
disconnected across-time.

3. Mystic religion is the solution to this problem, as well as the
search for the solution to this problem, providing a combination of
the usual egoic control-system together with a higher modification and
addition. Familiar egoic self-control concepts are recognized as
delusion, one originates no power, and yet some viable alternative
non-flawed and stable personal control-system is needed.

_______________________________________

The requirements as part of the problem definition and the solution
criteria are:

1. The improved personal control system must be effective (coherent,
stable, integrated across time and across the two cognitive states,
not filled with turmoil and frustration and self-challenging of
control-power)

2. The improved personal control system must be legit (non-deluded,
logically coherent),

3. The improved personal control system must accommodate the fact that
the egoic control system as an impression and predominant point of
view will continue to be in some way present in the ordinary cognitive
state.

_______________________________________

Solution Criteria

The solution:

1. Must be viable and less dissonant and frustrating than the egoic
control-system; that is, must lack that source of dissonance and
frustration

2. Must not be based on delusion

3. Must take into account the usual, useful presence of the
conventional illusion-utilizing egoic control system.

_______________________________________

The sacred marriage is designed as the solution to this problem. The
*transcendent* personal control system, as opposed to the *egoic*
personal control system:

1. Has a transcendent assumption that cross-time order prevails (it's
viable and non-frustrating across time)

2. Has its power attributed as originating from the mysterious hidden
transcendent source of thoughts, not from oneself as simple autonomous
thought-originator (it's not delusion-based about the source of the
origination of thoughts)

3. Integrates the egoic structures of self-control with transcendent
realization of the ultimate source of thoughts (it's dual-state,
dual-structure integrated).

That is the problem I was working on, and why I was studying the
dynamics of control, and why I considered the problem of control-chaos
threat and vulnerability.

_______________________________________

The Dissociative Insights That Arise Together

In the dissociative state, the following set of experiential insights
occur and arise together in combination as a system:

Overview:

Need a Doership-System that Somehow Avoids Crediting One's
Phantom-Self as Doer
Avoiding Relapse, Rebirth into Mortal Body, Refuse Backsliding into
Frustrating Delusion/Confusion Conventions
Level Splitting of Control into Secondary and Primary
Incoherence/Instability of Control Across Time Slices
Practical Power and Control Gone; Helplessness:
Power-Delusion Taken Away
Problem of Vulnerability to Control Seizure and Insane Control-Chaos
Need for Trust in the Transcendent

Details:

Need a Doership-System that Somehow Avoids Crediting One's
Phantom-Self as Doer

o You realize that you have no ultimate power to put in place or
actively "do" and "secure" some alternative transcendent conception.

o Oneself has no primary independent power to create or originate any
replacement ballast even if you could think of a ballast that wasn't
delusion-based.


Avoiding Relapse, Rebirth into Mortal Body, Refuse Backsliding into
Frustrating Delusion/Confusion Conventions

o A kind of self-wounding (stigmata) is needed to disprove once and
for all, with finality, the power of egoic self-control over time.
This amounts to a realization, a mental disproof, rather than action;
a realization about action and control and the ability of control to
cancel itself out.

o Egoic control-thinking is undesirable and unacceptable because
based/premised on illusion/misperception, and brings its inherent
frustrations.


Level Splitting of Control into Secondary and Primary

o The layer splitting of control, between oneself as
secondary-level-only controller, driven by the mysterious hidden
primary control-level.

o One learns to take the lower and the distinct higher-identification
points of view: "what should I do to regain my control" (said as the
lower point of view); "what does the higher source of thoughts do to
me to give me a replacement control-system or set of wings?" (said as
the higher point of view).


Incoherence/Instability of Control Across Time Slices

o There is control now, but not integrated across the time slices.

o Perceiving the threat of instability of control, if one has no real
power of control across time or within a time-slice.

o Your power divides into unlinked control monads in each timeslice,
producing mysterious practically uncontrollable untrammeled "power"
with no stability/continuity/coordination across time, which amounts
to no power.

o There is no stabilizing ballast connecting one's control across the
time slices.

o You need a way of cohering control across time given no substantial
power over yourself across time.


Practical Power and Control Gone; Helplessness:

o There are arms and power, but none that originates from me; no one
(no personal self) at the helm to steer thoughts and power.

o You experience having no arms, having no ability or power to
control your arms, only passively perceiving them, passively
perceiving the power that arises in your mind.

o You become too radically, chaotically free (no sense of cross-time
coherent restraint-power), and completely unfree, and never having had
freedom (or power, either).

o The usual ballast of egoic control is gone (it's stable, but
imperfect and inherently frustrating).


Power-Delusion Taken Away

o Your power has been taken away or shown as never having been there
(in the way usually conceived) but as an illusion, in the sense of
your delusion of having had power in first place, and also, your
stability is taken away.

o You perceive the revealed reality of no personal power (either
across time or within the timeslice as far as originated power).

o You realize that egoic pseudo-power is actually null and is just
the projection from a pattern from who knows where.


Problem of Vulnerability to Control Seizure and Insane Control-Chaos

o Panic, helplessness, and seizure of self-control.

o You seize, or suffer the risk of seizing.

o You have no ballast (other than retreating into unacceptable and
too-frustrating self-delusion), implying or raising the question of
life-destructive sheer chaos and randomness.


Need for Trust in the Transcendent

o Perceive the need to trust the mysterious source of thoughts, and
the need for some kind of transcendent rationality.

_______________________________________

Taking here the higher point of view, where the transcendent is the
only actor/initiator of action:

1. The hidden higher source of thoughts takes away or abducts your
accustomed false sense of self-power

2. The hidden higher source of thoughts shows you what it can make you
do (chaos) given no cross-time glue

3. The hidden higher source of thoughts then gives you a higher,
mystery-based identification and ballast which now incorporates your
previous conceptions into a new 2-part system.

_______________________________________

Why the desired solution (the transcendent personal control system one
has explicitly been developing as such), when solved and found, is
credited as being given to you from above, a giving that is initiated
from above:

The cross-time ego is seen as empty of its own power, but the egoic
scheme amounts to a kind of power as a pattern originating from who
knows where, with some degree of stabilizing power, albeit with its
inbuilt frustrations (per Wilber's Atman project theory) that one
eventually *insists* on outgrowing and transcending.

You can't actively make restabilization happen yourself as
power-initiating actor; the Ground of Being or higher and ultimate
source of thoughts drives that as the only real originator of action.

Just as biology makes puberty happen to us regardless of our choice,
so does the Ground of Being that is the real originator of our thought
make our realization happen to us and in our minds, and it makes our
rejection of egoic delusion happen.

Ultimately, the source of thoughts, rather than ourselves as egoic
phantom, is the real source of our rejecting our old self and makes us
be frustrated and displeased with our old self. The higher
thought-source makes us chase the Faustian project of eliminating our
erroneous notions about personal control power — notions that are
frustrating because erroneous.

It's always known during the entire project that the egoic personal
control system is frustrating *because* it's erroneous; the goal has
always been, from the start of the Faust project, to eliminate this
error in order to eliminate this frustration. All that Faust really
wants, which he rightly wants but of course initially mis-conceives
(as he is fully aware, by definition, and seeks to identify
specifically), is to eliminate his own problems and frustrations
regarding his personal control power.

The thought-source then shows the real origin of thoughts (disproving
and wounding the phantom-self as source of thoughts), then it restores
viable control across time, now revised to accommodate these insights
and eliminate the old frustrating, inherently unsatisfying conceptions
about personal control power.

Ganymede doesn't choose to fly off, driving an eagle; rather, Zeus
takes the initiative, sending his eagle to fly off with Ganymede. The
god (as the real, ultimate source of thoughts) is the
actor/abductor/marrier of the soul, it initiates breaking one's
delusion, it provides the alternative, transcendent view, it causes
the sacred marriage; Christ marries his bride the church; he initiates
the sacred marriage.
Group: egodeath Message: 4510 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 29/04/2006
Subject: The transcendent personal control system
The transcendent personal control system (as opposed to the egoic
personal control system) takes into account the dual layers of
thought-origination, and places dependent trust in the higher,
ultimate source of thoughts, considering the personal, lower-level
self as controller to be merely secondary and dependent.

The transcendent personal control system utilizes egoic thinking as a
useful illusion, rather than falling into it as delusion. The
transcendent personal control system is free from the particular kind
of frustration which results from mistaking the egoic self as the
simple literal origin of one's thoughts and sense of wielding
control-power across time.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: egodeath Message: 4511 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 30/04/2006
Subject: Re: Article: The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
http://www.egodeath.com/EntheogenTheoryOfReligion.htm

I finished adding and cleaning up the illustrations.

Removed "Fig. #".

Finished the captions.

Moved the relevant paragraph to below each illustration.

Reworded from 'seizure' in some spots.

Added:
The sacred marriage or pact with the divine provides a personal
control system that is viable and stable; is based on accurate
understanding about personal control agency instead of misperception
and frustrating confusion; and integrates one's mundane-realm personal
control activity with the transcendent realization that thoughts
originate from outside one's realm of control.

The illustrations are clustered too much, but I doubt I'll change it.


I'm doing a final read-through.
Group: egodeath Message: 4512 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/05/2006
Subject: Re: Article: The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
>>I'm doing a final read-through.

I now consider this article final and ready for print publication.

http://www.egodeath.com/EntheogenTheoryOfReligion.htm

I did a final read-through edit pass. Adjusted contrast on some
illustrations.

Added the caption for the tauroctony that shows Sol's face in the
upper left:

Sol represents the mind's awareness, which in the dissociative state
is positioned ecstatically outside the mind's functioning. The mind is
possessed and overtaken by Mithras. Pure awareness passively watches
the sacrificial disproof of the mind's claim to wield independent
personal control-power.
Group: egodeath Message: 4513 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/05/2006
Subject: Article: Wasson and Allegro on the Tree of Knowledge as Amanita
I wrote the following article in March, with help from Jan Irvin and
Judy Allegro.

Wasson and Allegro on the Tree of Knowledge as Amanita
by Michael Hoffman
http://www.egodeath.com/WassonEdenTree.htm
March 30, 2006
Ready for print publication.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Group: egodeath Message: 4514 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/05/2006
Subject: Re: Looking for conference to present at
>>I am looking for a conference at which to present my article

http://www.egodeath.com/EntheogenTheoryOfReligion.htm — will have 8
or more art illustrations and additional subheadings, and some minor
wording improvements.

http://www.egodeath.com/contact.htm


I plan to record reading aloud this 7405-word article. (That's the
body word-count.) It will take about 50 minutes to read the article
aloud, plus some additional time to point to the pictures.
Group: egodeath Message: 4515 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/05/2006
Subject: Re: Egodeath article
The article is now 8283 words — 1,283 words over my 7000-word ideal,
mostly due to adding captions. I'll leave it to the distant future to
knock this back down to 7000 words, which is the length people need.

The pictures steal some glory from the text, but it's an overall gain
— but the resulting effect is that the pictures, together with the
latest balanced word-choice, makes this theory seem tame, no big deal
— which is one aspect of my ideal, to take transcendent knowledge
down off its pedestal where it has been completely out of reach.
Modern scholars have become so entirely accustomed to being baffled by
pre-modern thought and art, it's startling to see a coherent simple
explanation of non-modern art that's bold and yet delivered as low-key
and no-big-deal, a simple natural explanation, so uncomplicated, so
un-fancy.

A key solution requirement is simplicity. Religion can't be
complicated; there's got to be some trick to it; therefore the
solution must be recognizable by its brevity and disarming simplicity;
it must be expressed by a short 7000 word article with low-key yet
surprising bibliography, and illustrations that show up modernity as
failing to see what was relatively obvious to the non-moderns who
worked with religious myth.

The main character of my past couple edits has been pendulum swing
among the requirements of multiple audiences. I've been asked
multiple times "but who is the intended audience?" The intended
audience for all of my research has always been "everyone" —
evangelicals, theorists, scholars, entheogen scholars, contemporary
entheogen users, systems theorists, engineers, programmers, mental
health researchers, schizophrenics, trippers in dire straits, stoned
people, drunk people, friends and family, clerics, ancient initiates,
Freemasons, fundamentalists, transpersonal psychologists, theologians,
Islamists, Jews, esotericists, satanists, cognitive scientists,
alcoholics, epileptics, people with OCD, quantum physicists, scholars
of Christian origins, Biblical hermeneuticists, Jesus scholars,
theorists of mystic experiencing, Buddhists, Zen practitioners, drug
policy reformers, drug war prisoners, prohibitionists, Catholics,
Gnostics, New Agers, Wiccans, shamans, Ayahuasca drinkers, and so on.

My terminology is sometimes repetitive partly because I avoided
falling back on cliche expressions which shut off thinking. That
repetition would be reduced by getting the word count down to 7000.
But I'll need a year before I can see improvements.
Group: egodeath Message: 4516 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/05/2006
Subject: Re: 1-year break from Egodeath research
Revised date:

I'm stopping Philosophy posting and research for 1 year; resuming May
1, 2007. I plan to present my paper
http://www.egodeath.com/EntheogenTheoryOfReligion.htm at a conference.
Group: egodeath Message: 4517 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/05/2006
Subject: Re: Looking for conference to present at
>> http://www.egodeath.com/EntheogenTheoryOfReligion.htm — will have
8 or more art illustrations and additional subheadings, and some minor
wording improvements.

Final count is 31 illustrations.
Group: egodeath Message: 4518 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/05/2006
Subject: Re: Egodeath article
The frontier explorer in me greatly dislikes having to spend so much
time with silly superficial polishing of wording for civilized
publication — and yet, this exercise of teaching, back in December
and this month, is the only way to understand the new material being
pulled together. There's no comparison between my understanding and
clarity in Oct. 2005 versus Jan. 2006 (vastly better), or between
March 2006 versus May 2006 (vastly better, still).

It's disconcerting how in just the past couple of days, I've made
tremendous improvements in framing the theory — which inevitably
seems to imply (which I dislike confronting) that it's barely started,
rather than finished. I'm finished with my project that started in
Oct. 1985, over 20 years ago, and yet, this article — which I started
drafting in Aug. 1988 — is now finished, but just stands as a good
starting point for people to begin studying these matters.
Group: egodeath Message: 4519 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/05/2006
Subject: Article: The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
Final draft, for print publication.

http://www.egodeath.com/EntheogenTheoryOfReligion.htm


The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death

by Michael S. Hoffman

May 1, 2006

Salvia Divinorum, Issue 4 – http://salvia.us/magazine.html


Contents

The Entheogen Theory of Religion 2

Origins of Christianity in Entheogenic Initiation 2

Sociopolitical Strategy of Canonical Christianity 2

Altered State Integrated into Ancient Culture 3

Modernity a Single-State Culture 3

Freedom for Higher-Order Religion 3

Role of Democracy for Ecstatic Danger 4

Initiation as Natural Developmental Sequence 4

The Entheogenic Future of Religion 4

The Dissociative Cognitive State 5

Restructuring Enabled by Loose Association Binding 5

Splitting of Representation and Referent Layers 6

The Moving Control-Agent as Mental Construct 6

Religious Effects of Salvia Divinorum 7

Myth Describes Dissociative Phenomena 7

The Block Universe and Frozen Worldlines 9

Time as a Space-like Dimension 9

Physical Fastening of All Thoughts and Actions 9

Fixed Worldlines of Subjective Experiencing 10

Accommodation to Everything Being Pre-set 12

Vertical, Timeless Determinism 13

Two Jumps to Transcend Determinism 14

Fatedness and Control in Astral Ascent Mysticism 14

Self-Control and the Hidden Source of Thoughts 17

The Goal of Understanding Ego Death 17

Deliberately Postulating Coming Control-Loss 18

The Control Breakdown and Transformation Potential 18

Transcendent Solution to Restoring Viable Control 19

Sin as Misattribution of Control-Thoughts 21

Wrath, Compassion, and Making Peace 21

Sacrificing to End Battling the Thought-Source 22

Vertical Atonement for Rebellion-Guilt 24

The Sacred Marriage 24

Bibliography 25


________________________________________

The Entheogen Theory of Religion

The entheogen theory of religion holds that the main origin and
ongoing wellspring of religion is visionary plants, such as Psilocybe
mushrooms, Peyote, Ayahuasca combinations, Salvia divinorum, Cannabis,
Opium, Henbane, Datura, Mandrake, Belladonna, ergot, and Amanita
mushrooms.

Visionary plants have been commonly used around the world throughout
the history of religion and culture (Hofmann, Schultes, & Ratsch
1992), including in the various forms of Western Esotericism (Heinrich
1994). Greek and Christian mythic-religious systems often refer to
visionary plants (Ruck, Staples, & Heinrich 2001). Leading mystics
throughout the history of various religions have used on-demand,
visionary-plant sessions with rationality-oriented mystic-state
experiencing (Merkur 2001).

Meditation, shamanic drumming, and liturgical ritual were developed as
activities to do in the plant-induced dissociative state, not as
methods of inducing the dissociative state in the first place.

Origins of Christianity in Entheogenic Initiation

The extent of entheogen use throughout Christian history has barely
been considered yet (Hoffman 2006). Early Christianity involved
mystical, religious, visionary experiencing, including the experience
of the transformative, transcendent power of the Holy Spirit at
Eucharistic agape meals (Johnson 1998). Early Christian writings show
familiarity with ecstatic mania, inspiration, elevated sobriety, and
"drunkenness" (Nasrallah 2003).

The Jesus figure is portrayed in the New Testament as a
spirit-possessed altered-state shamanistic healer (Davies 1995). The
figure of Paul the Apostle is portrayed as a shamanistic mystic
(Ashton 2000), and the apostles are portrayed as adepts in shamanic
altered-state mystic experiencing (Pilch 2004).

Solving the riddle of the original mystic-metaphorical meaning of
Christianity requires also understanding the surrounding metaphorical
altered-state initiation systems throughout Christian history,
including Roman religion, Neoplatonism, Western Esotericism, and
astral ascent mysticism.

The large window of the Legend of St. Eustace in Chartres cathedral
shows many 'mushroom trees' and unambiguous depictions of mushrooms;
hundreds of depictions of mushrooms appear in Christian art.

Sociopolitical Strategy of Canonical Christianity

The New Testament editors utilized the era's standard mastery of
mystic-state metaphor and the altered-state experience of communal
unity to direct the Jewish mystic-metaphor system into the figure of
Jesus, profitably sweeping together the various quasi-Christian
groups. They claimed themselves to have been appointed as the
administrators of the Eucharistic gatherings by Jesus, who they
portrayed as having been around just long enough to commission them
exclusively with all authority.

Jesus and all the apostles were entirely and strictly mythic (Doherty
1999, Drews 1924). The figure of Paul served as a controverted
authorial token (Detering 1995). The authors and redactors of the
writings attributed to Paul don't mention any biographical information
about the life of Jesus because the gospel story was a later, literary
creation, based on many sources, including Roman imperial ruler cult,
Josephus' writings, and Hellenistic literature.

Mystic revelation about self-will nullity was so routine, Roman
imperial theology utilized the mystic-state revelation to legitimate
the Roman sociopolitical arrangement. Christianity essentially charged
the Roman system with mysticism-abuse and became popular as an
counter-narrative about how the entheogen-accessed mystic revelation
should be used for sociopolitical concerns.

Altered State Integrated into Ancient Culture

The entheogenic altered state was integrated into culture, using
metaphor to map all domains together, including banquets and parties,
games, civic procession to a sacrificial altar, punishment, release of
captives, sport, taxation, alliances, and war.

A common standard banqueting tradition with reclining at table while
drinking 'mixed wine' ran across many seemingly disparate cultural
practices throughout antiquity (Smith 2003). 'Mixed wine' was the
central, reliable means of accessing the intense mystic altered state
throughout antiquity. Ancient 'mixed wine' specifically meant
visionary-plant mixtures (Ruck 1978), such as Psilocybe mushroom wine.
If Electric Kool-Aid in an Acid Test type of gathering were switched
with 'mixed wine' in a Hellenistic symposium, neither party would
notice much difference.

Socrates' initiation of elite youths outside official democratic
channels carried political implications and risks, because ancient
politics and religion were deliberately interlinked by mystic-state
experiencing.

Modernity a Single-State Culture

The adept use and comprehension of metaphor faded after the battle
between politicized Christianity and Scientism around 1700, leaving a
long-term standoff between mystically neutered religious literalism
versus exclusively ordinary-state-based Science. The culturally
predominant type of religion in the modern era neutralized and reduced
the traditional initiation system by a combination of
non-transformative surface ritual and intellectual speculation based
only in the ordinary cognitive state.

The modern cultural experience resulted from the predominance of the
ordinary cognitive state. The lack of culturally integrated
altered-state initiation caused the egoic mental world-model, based in
only a single cognitive state, to become completely predominant.

Authentic initiation is widely present in modern culture, including
art, literature, spirituality, and popular culture, but is not
integrated into the official culture; for example, the song "Help!"
written by John Lennon, the album Ride the Lightning by Metallica, and
the Matrix movie series.

Freedom for Higher-Order Religion

Lower-order religion is derivative, limited to mundane conduct-of-life
doctrine suited for the ordinary state of consciousness. The
higher-order version of each religion involves transformation of
personal control-agency concepts; revelation about control-system
limits and dependence on the transcendent; and re-attribution of the
origin of one's will and thoughts.

The essence of religious freedom is specifically the freedom to
reliably access mystic-state consciousness, as in early, house-church
Eucharistic agape meals, the ancient banqueting tradition, the mystery
religions, and symposium "drinking-party" associations, all of which
utilized mixtures containing visionary plants as their central
sacrament.

Suppressing entheogens because of their danger amounts to a blanket
illegalization of higher-order religion and primary religious
experiencing. As long as modern culture forbids itself the true,
ergonomic Eucharist, legislating against the entheogen-based ecstatic
heart of religion, religious freedom is restricted to selecting among
various brands of lower-order religion; higher-order religion is
placed off-limits, out of reach.

The ever-expanding drug schedules directly conflict with the only kind
of religious freedom that amounts to specifically religious freedom;
that is, freedom to regularly and ergonomically access primary
religious experiencing. The system of schedules is not from God, but
is an invention that ignores the central role of visionary plants in
religion, multi-state cognitive psychology, and the innate human drive
to self-transcendence.

Role of Democracy for Ecstatic Danger

The proper role for representative democracy regarding drugs is to
work out how visionary plants and psychoactive substances are to be
healthily integrated into American culture, making dissociative-state
religious initiation as ergonomic and as safe as possible. Drugs are
not a problem to be eliminated and suppressed, but a means of maturing
to be channeled.

The Supreme Court of the United States has recognized the legitimacy
of Peyote and Ayahuasca in worship; these plants have the same effects
as LSD and Psilocybe mushrooms, including causing the person's power
of will and power of self-control to become seized and then restored
in a religiously transformed configuration.

The threat of the encounter with the power of the divine is the threat
of loss of control of one's thoughts when studying self-knowledge in
the ecstatic state. This inherent danger of entheogens, a danger
inherent in the encounter with the power that transcends our personal
control of our will, is mitigated by having a systematic theory about
the nature of self-control agency, in conjunction with mastering the
skilled use of entheogens and understanding how past cultures have
accommodated this necessary danger which is the gateway to mature
religious knowledge.

Initiation as Natural Developmental Sequence

Greek and non-modern cultures integrated a series of altered-state
initiations. Initiation classically combines a series of
visionary-plant sessions with learning perennial philosophy, followed
by subsequent religiously integrated dissociation such as agape meals,
festival banquets, and symposium parties. Entheogenic religious
initiation was a prerequisite for symposium banqueting, so that
participants were experienced. The banqueting tradition including
symposium "drinking parties" included prayer and sacrifices; social
recreation and religious experiencing were not opposed activities.

The intention of a recreational or other non-religious user of
entheogens is commonly overcome by the inherently entheogenic nature
of the visionary plants, including revealing how personal control
depends on a source of thoughts outside one's domain of control – a
realization which is the gateway to religion. Young adults naturally
seek initiatory transformation; the modern culture of Prohibition
demands that they suppress this drive and permanently stunt their
growth, settling into the non-initiate's mindset for life, foregoing
enlightenment and religious revelation.

The Entheogenic Future of Religion

Ergonomic tools such as systematized theory and controllable
entheogens in post-modernity will make the mystic state common
knowledge again, but more explicitly and systematically than in
antiquity. For example, Salvia divinorum makes the dissociative-state
experience accessible, practical, and ergonomic. With the systematic
ego death theory in hand, there is no need for heroic doses of
psychoactives; moderate dosage is most effective.

New, culturally intelligible metaphor-systems will result from
culturally integrated agency-transformative entheogen use, including
self-control cybernetics.

The religio-political philosophy in the spirit of the United States is
to accept entheogens, accept culturally supported religious
self-control breakdown and transformation, accept the transcendent as
the ultimate ruler or governor, but reject all earthly systems of
government as being divinely authorized or approved.

Hallucinogenic drug-plants will be revived as the authentic vehicle
for the mystic state in communal religion, because they are
immediately available to all people and fully ergonomic. Christianity
will reawaken to its original idea of applying altered-state-based
mental worldmodel transformation toward providing an alternate
sociopolitical configuration or counter-narrative to any attempts to
abuse mystic-state revelation by utilizing it to prop up worldly
systems of sociopolitical governments that claim to be divinely
mandated.
Group: egodeath Message: 4520 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/05/2006
Subject: Re: Article: The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
________________________________________

The Dissociative Cognitive State

Mental constructs are dynamic association matrixes of mental
representations, held together by some degree of binding intensity.
Ordinary-state cognition is settled and immersed in the standard egoic
ruts of patterns and mental associations, such as trying to improvise
on a musical instrument but ending up playing repeated patterns.
Having a recognizable personality relies on such habitual patterns of
dynamic mental construct associations, which are dynamic within a
particular range or mode; behind their mask of habit-based,
pseudo-separate agency, everyone is Dionysus (that is, the ultimate
control-source).

Entheogens cause their various phenomenological effects by loosening
cognitive associations, causing mental construct processing to be
revealed as artificial representationalism and projection.

Ecstatic maenads mix visionary plants into wine in a wine-mixing bowl
in front of a column and mask that represent Dionysus and the timeless
frozen block-universe behind the mask of one's pseudo-autonomous
control-agency.

Restructuring Enabled by Loose Association Binding

The dissociative cognitive state loosens the mind's associative
binding, enabling deep revision of the interconnections between mental
constructs. Revolutionary conversion to a new theory or world-model
involves structural transformation of concept networks and
hierarchies, increased explanatory coherence, concept recombination,
and rational mechanisms of paradigm conversion (Thagard 1992).

Religion and myth are about dissociative-state experience, frozen-time
determinism, self-control cybernetics, and metaphorical description of
these. In intense primary religious experiencing, the mental model of
self and world undergoes a standard, pre-configured expansion and
transformation to take into account the representational nature of
experience, the experience of embeddedness in timeless unity, and the
limited and dependent nature of self-control agency, assisted by
metaphors describing the experiential insights.

Like the egoic cognitive structure, the transcendent mental model is
an innate, pre-configured structure that is discovered and revealed,
like the adolescent discovers the innate ability to climax, and then
is developed and refined, rather than being invented and constructed
as though an arbitrary invention. The ability to mystically climax is
inbuilt, as is the mental model that is revealed, although the useful
metaphors and systematic explanation necessary to retain the revealed
mental structure must be a product of human effort.

Splitting of Representation and Referent Layers

Salvia divinorum causes metaperception, which is the tangible
perception of the layer of mental constructs that is the only thing
directly presented to awareness. In the dissociative state, the
vantage-point of awareness is raised, or stepped back a level,
resulting in perceiving the cognitive workings of mental-construct
processing and perception itself.

Not only do associated mental constructs become separate from each
other, the mental representation of each item perceptibly splits and
separates from the represented referent, splitting into two
perceptibly distinct layers: the representation layer present like a
tangible painting, and a remote, speculative realm that is pointed to
but perceptually absent, like a foreign country one has never directly
seen (Hoffman 1996).

A person lives their entire subjectively experienced life inside a
simulation that their own mind produces by presenting mental
constructs to awareness. In metaperception, personal control-power and
personal movement through space and time appear as synthetic mental
constructs.

The Moving Control-Agent as Mental Construct

The mind in the ordinary cognitive state generates the sensation of
being an autonomous egoic agent wielding cross-time control-power
while moving through time and space; this sensation is a projected,
constructed, synthetic image and perspective.

The ego-entity exists as a real set of patterns and dynamics spread
across time, but the ego is not solid, continuous, or autonomously
powerful in the manner initially conceived. As a mental construct, the
self exists as a time-slice series: both as the entire series and as
individual time-slices, with the continuant agent's motion and
control-power mentally projected from within each time-slice.

Seeing the illusory aspects of mental representation of oneself, and
feeling static spacetime unity in the absence of the accustomed sense
of personal solidity, can be experienced as death – the ending of
personal existence – because the egoic-mode mind identifies one's
existence with the projected image and sensation of the moving
continuant agent and its control-power.

Religious Effects of Salvia Divinorum

Salvia divinorum is an ergonomic vehicle of religious revelation and
transformative, initiatory mental-model regeneration. Salvia produces
fewer bodily effects than LSD; it lacks the trembling, pupil dilation,
temperature swing, and heart palpitation. The reduction of bodily
effects, along with controllable dosage and short duration, makes
Salvia ideal for studying cognitive dynamics about time, will, and
control, including the nature of personal control agency. When Salvia
is combined with understanding the present theory, one can be
immediately and straightforwardly initiated into transcendent
self-knowledge.

Salvia can cause intense undulation of vision and of the mental
body-image similar to Laokoon, the seer and priest of Apollo, wrapped
by and wrestling with the two serpents of Apollo; Jonah, with the
currents, waves, and breakers swirling around him and threatening to
engulf him with turbulent waters, with seaweed wrapped around his
head; and Medusa, with snakes moving around her head. The material
plane itself, including one's mental body-image, seems to undulate,
not just one's visual perception of it.

Compared to mushrooms, Salvia produces less visual and auditory
distortion such as color smearing, blurring, surface waving, bending,
tracers, and audio warbling. Salvia causes sensations of explicit
representationalism, frozen timelessness, spacetime embeddedness and
spatial merging, and inability to control and steer one's thoughts;
awareness seems to sit still while thoughts arrive, presented and
given to disempowered, passive awareness.

Because of the short duration of smoked Salvia, the dynamics such as
"voyage", "long trip that plays out", and "epic journey" are reduced
compared to peyote or LSD; however, the same common theme can occur,
"there's no turning away from any control-crash that might be sitting
up ahead on the worldline". The duration of smoked Salvia is too brief
to enable transcendent, dissociative-state emotion.

Myth Describes Dissociative Phenomena

Myth is metaphorical description of the intense mystic-state
experiencing that results from visionary plants. Myth reflects
dissociative phenomenology or dissociative-state experiencing, not
ordinary-state experiencing.

Visionary-plant states and otherworldly themes form the tradition of
altered-state journeying (Culiano 1991). Many thematic categories of
metaphorical descriptions have been used throughout history to
describe dissociative-state sensations and experiences (Metzner 1986).
Metaphoricity is a prime characteristic of the entheogenic,
dissociative cognitive state (Shanon 2002).

The hunter Actaeon saw the goddess Artemis bathing naked, so she
turned him into an animal, and his own hunting dogs tore him to
pieces. The Actaeon hunting myth comprises the dissociative-state
themes of seeing divinity (the higher or ultimate control-level),
transgression of control-limits, transformation of oneself, mental
searching, dissociative fragmentation of the mental body-image, and
the death of the initial self-conception.

Depictions of Kali portray cognitive dis-integration of the mental
body-image as dismemberment, and the sensation of splitting into
multiple isolated time-slice selves.

Triptolemus is shown as a charioteer or steersman in a
Heimarmene-snake-drawn, winged chariot, with a large cup of
psychoactive mixed wine given to him by the goddess Demeter or
Persephone.
Group: egodeath Message: 4521 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/05/2006
Subject: Re: Article: The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
________________________________________

The Block Universe and Frozen Worldlines

Time can be envisioned as a space-like dimension, forming a block
universe that includes frozen, unchanging, snake-shaped personal
worldline threads, each snake or thread representing a person's entire
subjective stream of thoughts during their entire life (Rucker 1984).
Analytic philosophy and space-time physics have been brought together
to construct a tenseless, static model of time (Oaklander & Smith
1994). This perspective is characteristic of altered-state perception.

Time as a Space-like Dimension

Salvia divinorum produces a strong sensation of spatial merging and
unity. The static, frozen nature of time is perceived as a collection
of present moments, with time as a space-like dimension, but with
space itself seen to be not simply present, but rather, mediated
through present mental representations. The feeling of Salvia is
strange yet familiar, returning the mind to home-base – the
block-universe Origin.

Metaphors for experiencing embeddedness in the frozen, timeless
block-universe include the end of time, imprisonment, and fastening
the body to physical objects. Eastern expressions of experiencing the
frozen timeless block universe and transcending the idea of autonomous
moral agency include the Ground of Being or Tao that flows everywhere
including one's mind; escaping the endless round of moral karma and
its unbroken causal chain; and avoiding rebirth into a material,
mortal body.

In the dissociative cognitive state, objects and the controlling
ego-entity are explicitly perceived as extended across time; they are
perceptibly distributed along a fixed and pre-set stream of
time-slices frozen into position, such that a person appears as a
living statue consisting of a series and set of statues or
image-frames in incrementally different poses.

Time is no longer perceived as a flow, but as a frozen expanse and
positional relationship of stationary, distinct and separated
time-slices, with mental constructs, including personal
control-thoughts, permanently laid out across the time axis.

Physical Fastening of All Thoughts and Actions

In the dissociative state, all actions anyone has done in the world,
good and evil, are experienced as physically attached to one's own
arms, body, and train of thoughts that is frozen-into-spacetime.

Prometheus is chained looking out from the rock; Theseus and king
Pirithous are fused into the banqueting bench in Hades' and
Persephone's kingdom; king Pentheus is caught up in the tree looking
out; Osiris is trapped in the coffin by his brother; these are all
physically connected to the cross Jesus is nailed to, together with
his elect: dissociative-state initiates.

Hades imprisoned Persephone's would-be suitors/abductors by fusing
them to a magical bench and binding them to it with snakes while
bringing them mixed wine. It was possible for Heracles to free the
divine hero Theseus, but Heracles had to leave king Pirithous behind,
fused into the banqueting bench in Hades for eternity, because the
whole world shook when Heracles pulled him; this describes the
dissociative-state sensation of physical embeddedness in the timeless
block-universe, followed by abandoning the former pseudo-sovereign
model of one's personal control agency.

Fixed Worldlines of Subjective Experiencing

A person's subjective stream of conscious experience constituting
their entire life is a worldline frozen and embedded in spacetime in
the shape of a snake or a thread woven and cut by the Fates to a
predefined, finite length.

To be bitten by a snake, as in the allegory of Paul the Apostle after
his shipwreck, means to perceive the fatedness of one's entire stream
of thoughts. The seer Balaam rode his donkey on the road to Bamoth
Baal to curse the Israelites , but ended up blessing them. Balaam had
an unavoidable encounter with the angel of death on a narrow vineyard
path with no room to turn away to the right or to the left, and was
permitted to pass upon acknowledging that he speaks the words God puts
in his mouth.

A Pompeii house shrine shows a snake of pre-set inevitability reaching
the sacrament placed on top of an altar. The initiate's pre-set
worldline of experiencing and thoughts, nearing the point of ingesting
entheogens, was portrayed as a Heimarmene-snake that is destined and
drawn by divine Necessity to drink the entheogenic libation of
psychoactive wine in the wine-mixing bowl or cup of mixed wine, or
consume the psychoactive sacrificial cake on the sacrificial altar.

Banqueters on a bench are shown looking at a Heimarmene-snake ending
up at their own cup of mixed wine.

John the Evangelist has been shown as blessing a cup of the
Eucharistic sacrament shown as a snake.

A maenad, ecstatic follower of the god Dionysus, holds a snake,
representing awareness of fatedness and the fixity of one's entire
stream of thoughts.

Sacrifice is predestined and frozen into spacetime, comparable to the
labyrinth path leading the sacrificial youths to the Minotaur in the
central lair every year, and comparable to a city's festival
procession past sacred landmarks to a sacrifice at an altar. When
Perseus shows Medusa's Heimarmene-snaked head to king Polydectes and
his followers at the feast with 'mixed wine', they turn into stone,
helplessly frozen.

Kwan Yin masterfully rides the fatedness-serpent through the turbulent
sea, with a cup of visionary-plant elixir in hand.

Accommodation to Everything Being Pre-set

During the visionary-plant initiation, the feeling of being a
control-agent moving through time and space is replaced by the
sensation and perception of no-free-will – frozen-time block-universe
determinism – while the mind adjusts its mental world-model to fit the
transcendent perspective.

The Israelites rebelled against the Lord, so the Lord sent snakes
which fatally bit them; when the remaining people told Moses they had
sinned in speaking against the Lord, he told Moses to put a brass
snake on a pole, which the Israelites had to look at to prevent them
from dying from these snake-bites. These themes indicate realizing
personal non-control with respect to time: a pole serves as a clock
indicating the time through the position of its shadow; the snake's
rigidity and shape represent one's finite-length, pre-set worldline;
and fatal snake-bite indicates ego death upon seeing all one's
thoughts as timelessly pre-set and given; to be cured of snake-bite
and made immune to it is to continue life after ego death, purified of
misattribution of the source of one's thoughts and power of will.

'The chosen race of God', 'the elect', 'the immovable race', and
'double-predestination' express the idea that two sets of people are
timelessly pre-determined: those destined to be experientially
initiated into no-free-will, and those destined to remain under the
delusion of autonomous personal control-power.

The wide-eyed Minoan snake goddess ominously wields and controls
initiates' predestined, snake-shaped worldlines.

The initiate's eventual 2-level system of personal control can be
represented as a divine winged snake that rules from above,
interconnected with a personal pseudo-autonomous controller snake on
the lower level.

Vertical, Timeless Determinism

Late antique consciousness was centered around the doctrine and
mystic-state experience of the pre-setness of future thoughts and
occurrences. Heimarmene (Fatedness, Necessity, or timeless cosmic
determinism) was the central thematic concern of religions in the
Hellenistic era (Martin 1987). Similarly, Philosophical Metaphysics
investigates tenseless time, fatedness, agent movement through space
and time, and controller agents (Oaklander & Smith 1995).

The future is unchangeable and pre-set because of the static relation
of control to the time dimension, and because of the illusory aspect
of the continuant agent exercising power while moving through time.

Modern science introduces clockwork determinism and thereby reduces
the person to an automaton; Copenhagenist quantum mechanics aims to
provide an emancipating alternative to the hidden-variables
determinism of Einstein and Bohm, but limits this attempt to
intellectual activity and a flowing conception of time that are based
in the ordinary cognitive state, unlike the pre-modern approach.

Two Jumps to Transcend Determinism

Determinism is both a praised goal and a disparaged trap to escape,
due to determinism-awareness being the intermediate but not final goal
of religious mental transformation. Valentinian Gnosticism affirmed
cosmic determinism but also transcended it, and formulated two
contrasting schemes of thinking about moral culpability (Pagels 1992).

3-stage initiation paths centered around determinism are often posed
as 2-stage systems: they both endorse and disparage the realization of
determinism, which is the intermediate destination on the path to
salvific regeneration. The first demon or stage of egoic delusion to
be cast out is the assumption of simple independent self-command and
freewill; the second demon to be overcome is the mental model of
cosmic determinism or fatedness, in its practical problem-raising
aspect.

In Mark 9:14-29, Jesus exorcises the ego-demon from a youth supported
by his father; these four figures are aspects of the psyche.

Fatedness and Control in Astral Ascent Mysticism

Heimarmene or universal fatedness was centrally important in ancient
astrological cosmology (Barton 1994), and a major theme in
Hellenistic-Roman astral ascent mysticism and religion (Cumont 1960).
Transcending astral fatedness involved ingesting holy food, ambrosial
water, and astrological medicine (Fowden 1986).

Astral ascent mysticism centers around the dangerous gateway or
"fatal" boundary crossing – the sphere of the fixed stars –
representing the apprehension of Heimarmene and its control of one's
thoughts. The planets wind around the world in a spiral pattern over
time, depicted by the Heimarmene-snake wrapped around the cosmos,
cosmic egg, or Mithraic lion-headed gatekeeper figure.

Saturn, as governor or gatekeeper of the outermost planetary sphere
which is associated with the sphere of the fixed stars, rides in a
serpent-drawn chariot and eats the child or youthful self-concept as
the price of passage across the boundary into the transcendent heavens
beyond the starry Heimarmene-boundary.

Ancient Jewish writings metaphorically describe mystic-state
experiences, including the problem of how to get past various
threatening gatekeepers that are encountered during ascent (Arbel
2003). Pre-modern Christianity held that the body (lower self) was
controlled by Fate, but that the regenerated spirit (higher,
ultra-transcendent part of oneself) was above Fate, residing outside
the sphere of the fixed stars.

Christ tramples the cross of cosmic Heimarmene as the X-crossed gates
of hell, when harrowing hell and rescuing the elect from limbo (the
impotence of personal control-power in the face of cosmic determinism
and fatedness).

The hidden transcendent thought-source has been depicted as a hand
behind a cloud controlling the world-soul whose spirit transcends
material Necessity; the world-soul then controls Fate-subject
creatures.
Group: egodeath Message: 4522 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/05/2006
Subject: Re: Article: The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
________________________________________

Self-Control and the Hidden Source of Thoughts

The ego is the sense of being a metaphysically free, sovereign agent
that originates and controls its own thoughts, actions, and movements
of the will while moving through time and space.

Ego death is the cessation, in the intense mystic altered state, of
the sense and feeling of being a control-wielding agent moving through
time, and the replacement of that sensation by the experience of being
helplessly, powerlessly embedded in spacetime as purely a product of
spacetime, with control-thoughts being perceptibly inserted or set
into the stream of thought by a hidden, uncontrollable source.

The Goal of Understanding Ego Death

Ego death leaves one's initial, youthful "lie" behind – the confused
mental worldmodel that assumes oneself is the ultimate creator of
one's thoughts, actions, future, and movements of the will. The goal
of testing control in the altered state is not physically acting out
loss of control, but rather, fundamental self-knowledge and correction
of self-frustrating error and confusion: understanding the nature and
limits of control across time by exploring ideas of loss of control
and transcendent restabilization of control.

The promise of increased power over oneself leads to realizing the
logical impossibility of that mode of power, but produces instead a
viable alternate conception, of secondary-level, reflected power. The
vexing attempt to gain properly functioning self-control while holding
a confused model of self-control ceases. The misleading sensation of
the time-voyaging continuant agent being the originator of the power
of will is recognized as a conventional misperception and mental
oversimplification.

The Lone Soul in Purgatory shows the soul as imprisoned in chains,
purified in flames, and lifted up in redemptive release by
transcendent power.

In Gnosticism, the completed initiate belongs to the Immovable Race
and is able to stand stably in the face of overwhelming,
autonomy-undermining controllership emanating from the hidden,
uncontrollable, primary control-level. Insights about the limitations
of personal control-power result in a wounding of pride, but the mind
is otherwise unharmed, and made more durable ("imperishable"). A
personal control system becomes transcendence-compatible or "divinely
approved" when it repudiates the assumption that it can depend on its
own internal power to save itself during a control-limit violation.

Deliberately Postulating Coming Control-Loss

The religious path and method is to ingest entheogens; think about
your self-control power; disprove cross-time control; then depend on
transcendent power, rather than your own power, to provide coherent
self-control; this transforms your ideas about self and control to
conform to transcendent experiential dynamics, "conforming to the
image of God". The efficient method of enlightenment about the
dynamics of control-agency is to test self-control power by
deliberately supposing that loss-of-control is lying fated on the
worldline ahead, and then struggling to use one's personal
control-power to avoid that potentially given control-loss event,
while in the dissociative state.

The ability of one's immediate self to violate the accustomed desires
or will of one's overall cross-time self, including overriding the
accustomed self-preservation restraints, disproves the impression that
the time-voyaging continuant control-agent ever was in control as the
originator of personal thoughts, and reveals that the true origin of
the movements of the will the whole time was a hidden transcendent
source other than the self conceived of as a time-voyaging continuant
control-agent.

Religious revelation is of our cybernetic control-cancellation
potential and the ultimate source of control-power. Deliberately
thinking about being helplessly, inevitably, and irresistibly drawn
into the thought of near-future loss of control is a way of being
drawn up into heaven on Elijah's whirlwind or fire-chariot.

The Control Breakdown and Transformation Potential

After drinking mixed wine at the Last Supper, in the garden of
Gethsemane prior to the court trial, Jesus began to be deeply
distressed, amazed, and fearful (Mark 14:33), saying like an initiate
as though of a necessary poisoning of the lower self, "Father, remove
this cup from me; yet not what I will, but what Thou wilt." The mind's
local control-agency becomes distressed and apprehensive about whether
and how it can retain control, upon turning attention around,
perceptibly recognizing its vulnerability to thought-coercion and
control-instability, and seeing the illusory aspect of personal
autonomous power.

Ever-tighter, more forceful application of rationality that's premised
on the assumption of wielding control-power across time cannot save
the control-system from seizure during the disproof of the cross-time
phantom-self wielding power over each time-slice self. Testing our
control-power and discovering our dependent puppet-like status entails
deliberate disproof and self-cancellation of cross-time control, which
can threaten to lead to panic attack, self-control seizure, and
self-destructive control-chaos.

Relying on one's conventional power of control-logic and will, when
fully developed and perfected, leads to system lock-up – the
self-cancellation of personal control power. Demonic reason taken to
its full development creates an impossible mess and gets itself
tangled up, paralyzed in its own net of reasoning about control,
power, and will.

King Pentheus resisted Dionysus, the intruding foreign ruler coming in
from outside the kingdom, a mad divine power undermining the ruling
power of the local ruler; then king Pentheus was tricked into
participating in an ecstatic-state excursion, was lifted and caught up
helplessly in a tree, and was defeated and torn to pieces by his
mother and other raving Dionysus worshippers.

One's role as the independent creator and controller of one's thoughts
was an illusion. The current time-slice self or time-voyaging
continuant self is helpless to control or restrain the future
time-slice selves while playing with the idea of having, keeping, or
losing control; the result is like an army of lookalike time-slice
selves, fighting against each other.

'Idol worship', 'pride', or 'vanity' is the assumption that the power
of egoic control agency is real and substantial, and the futile
attempt to depend on that doomed pseudo-power configuration to save
oneself from the catastrophic failure of cybernetic self-control,
which is inherently, systemically entailed.

Julius Caesar was considered authorized for power by his seizures, and
the bull in his military's Mithraic mystery-cult was wounded in the
side, so the figure of Jesus was shown as similarly authorized by the
spear-wound in his side, and the figure of the apostle Paul was
portrayed as suffering from seizures. The ability to make self-control
seize or cancel itself dramatically is an afflicting thorn (2 Cor.
12:7-10), hole, or wound in our side, the innate cybernetic
governance-failure through which the new, transformed life is born.
The new transcendence-aware self is given birth through the
pride-killing disproof-wound in the side.

Transcendent Solution to Restoring Viable Control

A different approach and solution is required, to restore order from
the chaos of self-dependence that's based on incoherent premises, to
provide a more robust basis than reliance on personal power wielded by
the semi-illusory conventional self. Something that transcends
personal control-power logic is needed to provide an alternative to
the seized, useless logical scheme of egoic control power. After being
shown this cybernetically fatal potential, a rescuing miracle of
transcendent magic arrives from outside the system of egoic
control-power logic.

The mind's transcendent potential kicks in, realizing that the logic
of control-agency power originated by the phantom self cannot be the
solution to the very problem that such an inaccurate configuration
generated in the first place; one must put one's reliance on a
self-existing faith, compassion, heart, love, or benevolent Holy
Spirit, which cannot have any ordinary rational control-logic basis
and that one does not experience as a product of one's own egoic
control-power or will, but is consciously experienced as being given
by the hidden source of thoughts.

Solving the problem of true and justified mental order of personal
self-government instead of control-chaos comes through a transcendent
Zen jump. Depending on the egoic system of reasoning, which is
constructed around inherently self-frustrating premises, ultimately
leads to control lock-up and a catastrophically ineffective
self-cancellation of control. Buddha recognized that his destiny was
to touch the ground in an act of compassion and harmonious integration
with the unity of the Ground of Being, causing Mara and his army of
demons to instantly disperse – then he experienced enlightenment.

Viable and coherent control is provided by recognizing that personal
control depends on transcendent givenness of your thoughts by a
mysterious hidden source that ultimately caused the control lock-up
and independently saves your controllership, restoring it in a newly
coherent form. The hidden source of thoughts that provides a viable,
transcendent personal control system is personified as a merciful and
compassionate God.

The figure of Caesar was plugged into the routinized mystery-cult
format utilizing 'mixed wine'; these imperial-government themed
mystery cults had initiation rites for mystai using 'mixed wine'
heavily, along with symposium drinking parties (Pleket 1965). These
imperial mystery cults incorporated themes of ending civil war to
bring cooperation and prosperity among the former factions; defeat of
rebellious nations, pardon upon sacrifice to Caesar, then
incorporating them harmoniously into Caesar's peaceful empire; and
restoration of stable government by the divine higher-level ruler,
with Caesar as Jupiter's representative.

Our control-power has the Judas capability – the ability to betray the
illusory position of power, through divine, transcendent
power-seizure, and thereby deliver our lower, "rebellious" claim of
independent kingship-power over to the transcendent level of governing
power.

In John 11, Lazarus is transcendently lifted up from ego-death
control-power paralysis by Jesus as the representative of the
separate, higher-level source of thoughts. Jesus told his disciples
"Lazarus is dead, and for your sake I am glad I was not there, so that
you may believe. But let us go to him." Then Thomas (called Didymus,
the twin) said to the rest of the disciples, "Let us also go, that we
may die with him."

Maria the Divine Shepherdess of Souls, Divina Pastora, as benevolent
and trustworthy thought-provider rescues and protects the person from
the direly threatening wolf, which is the threat of loss of control or
hostile control-usurpation by the hidden thought-source. After
transcendently being moved out from the doomed system of
pseudo-independent personal control logic, one experiences the joyful
sense of relief and thankfulness of having been rescued from certain
peril from outside the resources one wields as a local locus of
control and a time-voyaging continuant control-agent.

Sin as Misattribution of Control-Thoughts

Upon initiation, the concept of 'sin' is reinterpreted and revised,
producing a transformed mental model which understands 'sin' to be a
logical error about the nature of control-agency and
agent-culpability. Sin is a matter of understanding and meaning-shift.
The secret of the kingdom of God has been given, but cloaked in
double-meanings so that those on the outside may see and hear but not
understand, lest they turn about and their sins be forgiven (Mark
4:12).

In mystic metaphor, misunderstanding moral agency is considered the
fundamental sin and immorality; God was most angry about the king's
rebellious worship of idols that are fashioned out of created
materials – a metaphor for taking pseudo-autonomous personal
control-agency as though it were genuinely autonomous. Reformed
theology affirms the predestination of who God gives salvific grace
to, while holding to the moral culpability of created persons – this
Augustinian compound model is a bi-modal, metaphorical
meaning-shifting technique, rather than a simply inconsistent
combination of beliefs.

A person's will appears to be originated and controlled by the
time-voyaging continuant agent that's projected out from each
time-slice along the person's timelessly frozen worldline; the
conception of personal control agency that is built around this
illusion is 'sin' and the 'lie'.

Wrath, Compassion, and Making Peace

'Wrath' means the threat that Fate or blind, machine-like determinism
is ultimately in control of your coming thoughts but is set against
your claim to exert independent power over your thoughts.

Mystic-state 'compassion' and 'rescue that narrowly averts divine
wrath' means that that which ultimately gives you your thoughts is
intimately united with you and is good or benevolent toward you,
bringing you into a harmonious, reconciled, integrated relationship
with the compassionate and beneficent controller of all that happens,
including your own near-future thoughts.

The wrath/compassion polarity is portrayed as paired deities of wrath
and compassion in Tibetan Buddhism; dual traits of the Creator
(justice and mercy); and Jesus as harsh righteous judge with Mary as
compassionate intercessor. The god of battling and the goddess of love
– Ares and Aphrodite (Mars and Venus) – were caught together in a
near-invisible net, producing the child Harmonia (Concordia).

Jupiter Optimus Maximus means 'all-good' and 'all-powerful', as is
hoped for from a protective deity when one is vulnerable to awareness
of Heimarmene in the intense mystic altered state.

Mithras demonstrates that his arm wields control over the power of the
bull's shoulder. Sol is reconciled with Mithras in a pact, and given
transcendent power. Sol becomes an authorized charioteer, steering the
quadriga with Mithras, guided by Mercury (Hermes) holding a
Fatedness-snake on a time-pole.

Sacrificing to End Battling the Thought-Source

'Sacrifice' is a mental attitude of cooperative dependence on that
which gives thoughts, your will having been overcome and made to will
its own demise as an empty delusion, turned against itself by
now-revealed transcendent power. Sacrifice offers up and hands over
your claim to effective independent power, as opposed to battling
against your near-future self and the inherently overpowering source
of all thoughts and movements of will.

Sacrificing your autonomy-claim, acknowledging your dependency on that
which ultimately gives you your thoughts, brings mental peace and
harmony and calms turmoil, because you are relieved from increasing
your attempt to grasp and secure power over your own power; relieved
from testing the power of your autonomy and the limits of your
self-control thoughts.

Roman sacrificial altars are typically shown with a libation of
concentrated, psychoactive unmixed wine being poured on the altar,
which opens up a channel to the gods, along with the sacrificial
animal such as the unresisting, cooperative bull. The sacrificer
pouring the libation has a cloth behind the head, representing the
spiritual ecstatic state, where awareness is positioned outside of the
usual mind, perceiving its functioning.

Mithras overpowering and sacrificing the bull represents the delusion
of self-originated control-power being given over to the transcendent
level, with Mithras' arm wielding the bull's shoulder and his knife
piercing and fatally wounding it; the wound in the bull's side
indicates Mithras demonstrating his power over the bull's
control-power. Mithras wrestles and overpowers the initiate's control
of their will, reconfiguring their understanding of control-power to
account for the transcendent givenness of one's thoughts.

Sol represents the mind's awareness, which in the dissociative state
is positioned ecstatically outside the mind's functioning. The mind is
possessed and overtaken by Mithras. Pure awareness passively watches
the sacrificial disproof of the mind's claim to wield independent
personal control-power.

A tauroctony shows: the self-command bull being sacrificed near the
shoulder; a Heimarmene-snake inevitably drawn toward ingesting the
entheogenic blood (often the snake approaches a wine-mixing bowl below
the bull instead); a blue-stemmed Psilocybe mushroom in Mithras' leg
and garment with 7-stepped stem; the sphere of the fixed stars shown
inside the underworld cave; a billowing cape behind Mithras indicating
the ecstatic state; the god making the bull paralyzed and unable to
stand; Mithras' feminine features indicating the soul abducted and
married by divine power; and Mithras turning to knowingly look back
behind the conventional self-concept to see the source of thoughts and
movements of the will.

Vertical Atonement for Rebellion-Guilt

Vicarious atonement entails a vertical shift upward of guilt and
responsibility to a higher-level controller, not a horizontal shift
sideways to a morally better person. A vertical 2-level legal and
moral relationship applies to all controller/agent scenarios:
master/slave, commander/soldier, potter/clay, puppetmaster/puppet,
creator/creature, and virtual-world creator/virtual agent.

Releasing a prisoner who is a rebel slave (claimant to autonomy), and
punishing a mock king in their stead by death sentence, is found in
the Roman Saturnalia and in the mystic allegory of Jesus' trial; the
rebel Barabbas (son of father) is released.

The Jesus figure was portrayed in the New Testament as the earthly
representation and manifestation of the all-powerful and
all-controlling Jewish creator God (Thompson 2001). Jesus is held to
be innocent in the sense of not himself rebelling against God (that
is, he never mistook the pseudo-autonomy of personal control-agents as
literal autonomy), but being the Creator's representative figure
within the created world, he was ultimately responsible or guilty for
all instances of such 'rebellion' which did occur by other people.

The dissociative-state revelation that higher-order power stands over
the source of our control-thoughts is described as rendering the
initiate no longer under the sentence of death, making them mature,
washed clean, perfected, imperishable, or possessing eternal life, in
that they have already died as an autonomous moral agent, following
the pattern metaphorically expressed in the figure of Jesus. "Anyone
who follows me must deny himself and take up his cross, for whoever
loses his life for me will find it." (Matt. 10:38-39, 16 24-25; Mark
8:34-35; Luke 9:23-24)

Lucifer fell from heaven, as Adam fell, due to pride through the
virtual power of his virtual free will. Justice consistent with this
metaphorical meaning-mode requires that he suffer a virtual
death-sentence for his rebellious autonomy-claim; this sin is
"punished" in the appropriate sense through mystic-state ego death and
thereby done away with. Justice about ultimate responsibility is
thereby fulfilled, and the initial, youthful error about our
independent self-command corrected.

The Sacred Marriage

The sacred marriage or pact with the divine provides a transcendent
personal control system that is viable and stable; is based on mature,
refined understanding about personal control agency instead of
misperception and frustrating confusion; and integrates one's
mundane-realm personal control activity with the transcendent
realization that thoughts originate from outside one's realm of
control.

In the ancient Greek tradition, marriage incorporated the themes of
abduction and death of the girl, together with entheogenic initiation
(Ruck 1978); similarly, Christ raptures-away and marries his Church,
the initiated elect, as his bride.

Dionysus and the abducted/married soul, Ariadne, ride in Dionysus'
victory procession, in a chariot drawn by four mushroom-tigers.

The uncontrollable hidden separate controller abducts and overtakes
your innermost locus of control-power, as though that innermost
wellspring of your thoughts is your generative organ and ego death is
climax, giving birth to the new self that is married to the higher
controller. The sacred marriage of hidden and visible levels of
control, producing new life, is celebrated in the wedding banquet with
entheogenic mixed wine.
Group: egodeath Message: 4523 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/05/2006
Subject: Re: Article: The Entheogen Theory of Religion and Ego Death
________________________________________

Bibliography

Michael Hoffman has been developing the Cybernetic Theory of Ego
Transcendence since 1985, including the maximal entheogen theory of
religion; see Egodeath.com.

Arbel, V. Beholders of Divine Secrets: Mysticism and Myth in the
Hekhalot and Merkavah Literature. Albany: SUNY, 2003.

Ashton, J. The Religion of Paul the Apostle. New Haven: Yale, 2000.

Balsekar, R. Who Cares? The Unique Teaching of Ramesh S. Balsekar.
Redondo Beach: Advaita, 1999.

Barton, T. Ancient Astrology. London: Routledge, 1994.

Bryan, C. Render to Caesar: Jesus, the Early Church, and the Roman
Superpower. New York: Oxford, 2005.

Collins, J. J. (editor), and M. Fishbane (editor). Death, Ecstasy, and
Other Worldly Journeys. Albany: SUNY, 1995.

Crowley, M. Secret Drugs of Buddhism. Forthcoming, and presented at
Entheogenesis Conference 2004.

Culiano, I. Out of This World: Otherworldly Journeys from Gilgamesh to
Albert Einstein. Boston: Shambhala, 1991.

Cumont, F. Astrology and Religion among the Greeks and Romans. New
York: Dover, 1960 (1912).

Davies, S. Jesus the Healer: Possession, Trance, and the Origins of
Christianity. New York: Continuum, 1995.

Detering, H. Der Gefälschte Paulus; The Fabricated Paul: Early
Christianity in the Twilight. Düsseldorf: Patmos, 1995.

Doherty, E. The Jesus Puzzle: Did Christianity Begin with a Mythical
Christ? Challenging the Existence of an Historical Jesus. Ottawa:
Canadian Humanist. 1999.

Drews, A. Die Petruslegende; The Legend of Saint Peter: A Contribution
to the Mythology of Christianity. Frankfurt: Neuer Frankfurter, 1910,
1924.

Fishbane, M. The Kiss of God: Spiritual and Mystical Death in Judaism.
Seattle: University of Washington, 1994.

Forte, R. (editor). Entheogens and the Future of Religion. San
Francisco: Council on Spiritual Practices, 1997.

Fowden, G. The Egyptian Hermes: A Historical Approach to the Late
Pagan Mind. Princeton: Princeton University, 1986.

Freke, T.; and P. Gandy. The Complete Guide to World Mysticism.
London: Piatkus, 1997.

Grof, S. (editor), and C. Grof (editor). Spiritual Emergency: When
Personal Transformation Becomes a Crisis. New York: Tarcher/Putnam,
1989.

Grof, S.; and C. Grof. Beyond Death: The Gates of Consciousness.
London: Thames and Hudson, 1980.

Heinrich, C. Strange Fruit: Alchemy and Religion: The Hidden Truth.
London: Bloomsbury, 1994.

Hoffman, M. A. (editor). Entheos: The Journal of Psychedelic
Spirituality. Entheomedia.org, 2001-2002.

Hoffman, M. A., C. A. P. Ruck, and B. Staples. “The Entheogenic
Eucharist of Mithras”. Entheos 2.1:13-46 (2002).

Hoffman, M. S. “Wasson and Allegro on the Tree of Knowledge as
Amanita”. Journal of Higher Criticism, forthcoming, 2006.

Hoffman, M. S. “The Bubble of Simulation: Subjective Experience as a
Virtual Environment”. Crash Collusion 10:21-22, 1996.

Hofmann, A.; R. E. Schultes; and C. Ratsch. Plants of the Gods: Their
Sacred, Healing and Hallucinogenic Powers. Rochester: Healing Arts,
1992 (1979).

Johnson, L. T. Religious Experience in Earliest Christianity: A
Missing Dimension in New Testament Studies. Minneapolis: Augsburg,
1998.

Kubby, S. The Politics of Consciousness: A Practical Guide to Personal
Freedom. Port Townsend: Loompanics, 1995.

Martin, L. H. Hellenistic Religions: An Introduction. New York: Oxford
University, 1987.

Merkur, D. Gnosis: An Esoteric Tradition of Mystical Visions and
Unions. Albany: SUNY, 1993.

Merkur, D. The Psychedelic Sacrament: Manna, Meditation, and Mystical
Experience. Rochester: Park Street, 2001.

Metzner, R. The Unfolding Self: Varieties of Transformative
Experience. Novato: Origin, 1997 (1986).

Nasrallah, L. An Ecstasy of Folly: Prophecy and Authority in Early
Christianity. Cambridge: Harvard, 2003.

Oaklander, L. N. (editor), and Q. Smith (editor). The New Theory of
Time. New Haven: Yale, 1994.

Oaklander, L. N., and Q. Smith. Time, Change and Freedom: An
Introduction to Metaphysics. New York: Routledge, 1995.

Pagels, E. The Gnostic Paul: Gnostic Exegesis of the Pauline Letters.
Harrisburg: Trinity, 1992 (1975).

Pleket, H. W. “An Aspect of the Emperor Cult: Imperial Mysteries.”
Harvard Theological Review 58:331-47 (1965).

Pilch, J. J. Visions and Healing in the Acts of the Apostles: How the
Early Believers Experienced God. Collegeville: Liturgical, 2004.

Ruck, C.; B. Staples; and C. Heinrich. The Apples of Apollo: Pagan and
Christian Mysteries of the Eucharist. Durham: Carolina Academic, 2001.

Rucker, R. The Fourth Dimension: A Guided Tour of the Higher
Universes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1984.

Russell, D. Shamanism and the Drug Propaganda: Patriarchy and the Drug
War. Camden: Kalyx, 1998.

Shanon, B. The Antipodes of the Mind: Charting the Phenomenology of
the Ayahuasca Experience. New York: Oxford University, 2002.

Smith, D. E. From Symposium to Eucharist: The Banquet in the Early
Christian World. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2003.

Taylor-Perry, R. The God Who Comes: Dionysian Mysteries Reclaimed. New
York: Algora, 2003.

Thagard, P. Conceptual Revolutions. Princeton: Princeton University,
1992.

Thompson, M. M. The God of the Gospel of John. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans,
2001.

Ulansey, D. “The Eighth Gate: The Mithraic Lion-Headed Figure and the
Platonic World-Soul”. Forthcoming; online.

Vernant, J-P.; and P. Vidal-Naquet. Myth and Tragedy in Ancient
Greece. New York: Zone, 1988 (1972).

Wasson, R. G.; A. Hofmann, and C. Ruck. The Road to Eleusis: Unveiling
the Secret of the Mysteries. Los Angeles: Hermes, 1998 (1978).

Watts, A. “Zen and the Problem of Control”, in This Is It and Other
Essays. New York: Vintage, 1973 (1958).

Wegner, D. White Bears and Other Unwanted Thoughts: Suppression,
Obsession, and the Psychology of Mental Control. New York: Guilford,
1989.

White, R. Nietzsche and the Problem of Sovereignty. Chicago:
University of Illinois, 1997.

Williams, M. A. The Immovable Race: Gnostic Designation and the Theme
of Stability in Late Antiquity. Leiden: Brill, 1997.

Copyright © 2006 Michael S. Hoffman. All rights reserved.
Group: egodeath Message: 4524 From: Michael Hoffman Date: 01/05/2006
Subject: Re: Egodeath article
http://www.egodeath.com/rushlyrics.htm
http://www.egodeath.com/images/caressbkcover.jpg — in the
dissociative state, this moves around and the mind constructs patterns

Artist: Rush
Album: Caress of Steel
Song: The Fountain of Lamneth: VI. The Fountain
Year: 1975


Though I've reached a signpost
It's really not the end
Like old Sol behind the mountain
I'll be coming up again

Author: egodeaththeory

http://egodeath.com

Leave a comment

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started